Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
SSRN
Working paper
In: International journal of legal information: IJLI ; the official journal of the International Association of Law Libraries, Band 32, Heft 3, S. 627-638
ISSN: 2331-4117
MERCOSUR is the world's fourth largest trade area, considering its economic importance. It was established by the Asuncion Treaty, signed on March 26, 1991. On January 1, 1995, a Customs Union was established between the four member countries, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay.
In: International Handbooks on Economic Integration 1
Latin America's experience with regional economic integration has been only slightly shorter than that of Europe. In fact, the first attempt at integration started as early as 1960, with the creation of LAFTA - the Latin American Free Trade Area (subsequently replaced by LAIA - the Latin American Integration Association). LAFTA, composed of 11 countries, sought, unsuccessfully, to create a free trade area in 12 years. In 1969, the Andean pact, which sought, also unsuccessfully, to create a sub-regional free trade area, was set up. Recently the Presidents of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay signed the Treaty of Asuncion aimed at creating a common market as from 1st January, 1995. This common market, MERCOSUR, will be completed by 2006. In comparison with the earlier and unsuccessful attempts at integration, and despite challenges and problems, both internal and external, MERCOSUR is working, and trade between the member States is increasing. Furthermore, as with the case of the European Union (EU), serious attempts (notably between Argentina and Brazil) are being made to co-ordinate economic and monetary policies. The most important evidence of these moves is the introduction of hard currencies, the reduction in the size of the public sector and the privatization of State assets. These are clearly exciting times for Latin American integration. In this book, the first in a new series of books on International Economic Integration, the authors examine the experience of MERCOSUR in the Latin American integration progress. After an analysis of the history of the moves towards integration in South America, the case of each Member State and the Associate Country is examined and perspectives for the future are assessed
In: Latin American politics and society, Band 45, Heft 2, S. 67-104
ISSN: 1531-426X
In: Unisa Latin American report, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 4-11
ISSN: 0256-6060
Este articulo intenta llamar la atencion sobre las denominadas "limitaciones democraticas" en el proceso de creacion del Mercosur, integrado por Argentina, Brasil, Paraguay y Uruguay. En estos paises, definidos como "democracias no consolidadas", resulta obvio el modo autoritario en que desarrollan las politicas publicas, especialmente en esferas de la economia y las relaciones exteriores. El Tratado de Asuncion, que establecio el Mercosur, constituye un ejemplo de esta conducta, al igual que la falta de comprension que han mostrado los gobiernos, durante todo el proceso, con repecto a las posibles consecuencias de este proyecto de integracion para la fuerza laboral y para sus respectivas sociedades. (UNISA Lat Am Rep/DÜI)
World Affairs Online
In: Schriften des Europa-Instituts der Universität des Saarlandes - Rechtswissenschaft 66
In: Brazilian Journal of International Relations: BJIR, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 402-430
ISSN: 2237-7743
The question that the paper tries to respond is: Can a supranational model be adopted by Mercosur? The paper starts with definitions about supranationalism, sovereignty and intergovernmentalism, analyzes the most common regional integration theories and the historical backgrounds of the European Union and Mercosur. In the last part the concept of key variables by Best (1997) is applied in order to conceptualize the complexities of regional integration and provides additional knowledge to the theoretical discussion. The conclusion is that the implementation of supranationalism does not seem appropriate because of South America's different historical background, its national institutions and traditional inclination to national sovereign rights. Further, it is argued that the Brazilians strong power position, its functional regionalism for its own purpose and the lack of credible commitment between the member states of Mercosur especially between Brazil and Argentina do not provide fertile ground for supranationalism.Keywords: Mercosur, sovereignty, intergovernmentalism, European Union, SupranationalismResumo: A questão que o trabalho trata é a seguinte: O Mercosul pode adotar um modelo supranacional? O trabalho começa com definições sobre supranacionalidade, soberania e intergovernamentalismo, analisa as teorias mais comuns na integração regional e o contexto histório de cada arranjo regional, da União Europeia e do Mercosul. Na última parte, o conceito das principais variáveis de Best (1997) é aplicado para conceitualizar a complexidade da integração regional e fornece conhecimento adicional para a discussão teórica. A conclusão é que a implementação da supranacionalidade não parece apropriada por causa do contexto histórico diferente da América do Sul, das instituições nacionais e as inclinações para direitos nacionais de soberania. Além disso, alega-se que a forte posição do poder do Brasil, o regionalismo funcional aplicado para os próprios benefícios e a falta de um compromisso credível entre os estados membros do Mercosul especialmente entre Brasil e Argentina não fornece solo fértil para a supranacionalidade.Palavras-chave: Mercosul, Soberania, Intergovernmentalismo, União Europeia, Supranacionalidade
World Affairs Online
In: Lateinamerika-Analysen, Heft 1, S. 115-182
ISSN: 1619-1684
Die hier vorliegenden Beiträge sind das Ergebnis eines "Mercosur-Panels" der 2001 gegründeten ADLAF-Arbeitsgruppe Internationale Beziehungen. Zwei Analysen zu den Ursachen der aktuellen Krise des Mercosur aus ökonomischer und politikwissenschaftlicher Perspektive werden durch vier kurze essayistische Stellungnahmen ergänzt. Die interdisziplinären Beiträge wollen die Ursachen der gegenwärtigen Krise des Mercosur aufdecken und mögliche Lösungsansätze zur Diskussion stellen. (Lat.am Anal/DÜI)
World Affairs Online
In: Ila: das Lateinamerika-Magazin, Heft 429, S. 4-35
ISSN: 0946-5057
World Affairs Online
In: Lateinamerika-Analysen, Heft 1, S. 115-158
ISSN: 1619-1684, 1619-1684
This study is focused on the evaluation of successes and failures of the Common Market of the South (Mercosur). This analysis of Mercosur's integration seeks to identify the reasons why the bloc has stagnated in an incomplete customs union condition, although it was originally created to achieve a common market status. To understand the evolution of Mercosur, the study offers some thoughts about the role of the European Union (
BASE