Imperial Grunts. The American Military on the Ground
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 64, Heft 1, S. 129-133
ISSN: 0020-577X
159 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 64, Heft 1, S. 129-133
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Stat & styring, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 40-43
ISSN: 0809-750X
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 13, S. 32-33
ISSN: 2387-4562
For a long time, the Arctic has been regarded as a stable region with low tension. However, even though low tension prevails, it is a fact that the circumpolar region also encompasses some of the world's most capable and potent military capabilities. The key role of the Arctic regarding security issues, international relations and geopolitics, is sometimes underplayed or not fully understood. These aspects of security are investigated in this thematic issue of Arctic Review on Law and Politics.
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 13, S. 53-71
ISSN: 2387-4562
Since the start of the Ukrainian crisis in 2014, the Nordic states have sought to advance their defence cooperation "beyond peacetime" to also encompass operational military cooperation in crisis and armed conflict. Relations between the two Nordic non-NATO members, Sweden and Finland, have formed a vanguard, encompassing bilateral operational planning beyond peacetime. While no formal security policy guarantees have been exchanged, Sweden and Finland have created strong expectations that they will lend each other support in a crisis. In short, while no formal alliance treaty exists, the two states have nevertheless become closely aligned. In 2020, Sweden and Finland joined NATO member Norway in signalling their intention to strengthen their trilateral defence relationship. The following year, NATO members Norway and Denmark signed a similar agreement with Sweden. The goal of these documents was to coordinate their national operational plans – their "war plans" – and perhaps develop some common operational plans. In this article, it is argued that these agreements fall short of a formal military alliance, but that they represent an alignment policy between the Nordic states.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 66, Heft 2-3, S. 287-318
ISSN: 0020-577X
Multilateralism has been low on the American foreign policy agenda during the Bush-administration, but many Europeans seem to think that this will change after the upcoming elections. This might be right, but the changes will not reflect European desires. This article starts out by debunking some prevalent European myths about US politics. This is followed by a discussion of the central aspects of American foreign policy thought, & how the presidential candidates reappraise historical themes. In the last part of the article, American neo-sovereignty is contrasted with European post-sovereignty & the conclusion spells out some of the dilemmas facing them both. Figures, References. Adapted from the source document.
In: NUPI Rapport, Nr. 114
World Affairs Online
In: Stat & styring, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 10-13
ISSN: 0809-750X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 3, S. 543-546
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 180-182
ISSN: 1891-1781
In: Stat & styring, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 57-58
ISSN: 0809-750X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 62, Heft 3, S. 460-465
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 61, Heft 3, S. 351-374
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift: The Nordic journal of cultural policy, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 222-249
ISSN: 2000-8325