Suchergebnisse

A reply to Beyond Precision (Roblyer) the author delineating five obstacles facing the development of a practical model of military ethics. The objectivity of the Just War theory principle of "good effects outweighing the bad effects" is questioned since the determination of the legitimate balance between good and bad effects is a subjective process. Organizationally, the hierarchical structure of the military blocks & punishes the transmission of unwanted information, & often absolves top decision makers of direct responsibility. The power, distance & durability of weaponry effects are in actuality uncontrollable by the military. Nondistinctive combatants are confused with noncombatant civilians, reducing incentive to reduce collateral casualties. The psychological effects of distance warfare & post hostility disparagement dehumanize opponents, creating a dichotomous "us/them" mentality. The wider context & justifications of military decision making far outweigh the ability of individual "reasonable commanders" to adhere to moral standards through international agreements or military protocols. Since the current U.S. political climate is closed to serious consideration of social science recommendations by those in power, the opportunity for development of military ethics is limited. 5 References. J. Harwell

The Routledge Handbook of Military Ethics is a comprehensive reference work that addresses concerns held in common by the military services of many nations. It attempts to discern both moral dilemmas and clusters of moral principles held in common by all practitioners of this profession, regardless of nation or culture. Comprising essays by contributors drawn from the four service branches (Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine corps) as well as civilian academics specializing in this field, this handbook discusses the relationship of ""ethics"" in the military setting to applied and professional