Suchergebnisse

中國河南省鄧州市,被稱為世界鄧氏的發源地。鄧姓後人自五千年前開始便不斷外遷,至今分佈在世界各地的鄧氏總人口達七百餘萬。自二千年開始,位於鄧州市有"天下鄧氏第一陵"之稱的吾離陵園,成為鄧州市的重點發展項目之一,市政府積極向世界鄧氏宣傳鄧州和陵園保護建設,部分鄧氏後人也紛紛捐款支持。本論文探討跨地域網絡與文化遺產保護的關係,透過在三個鄧氏團體(鄧村、香港和多倫多)的田野考察,了解鄧氏後人對建立世界"鄧氏文化遺產"的看法。我將會探究為何鄧州政府和部分鄧氏後人投資巨款於陵墓建設上,而其他人則拒絶贊助?在全球化的環境下,政治、經濟、宗教、社會和文化因素如何推動或拒絶族氏文化遺產的建立?本論文的最終目的是探討跨地域網絡如何影響文化遺產管理,和不同利益團體對建立世界"鄧氏文化遺產"的解讀。 ; The Tang clan is said to have originated from Dengzhou City, Henan Province, China; members of the Tang clan began their migratory trek 5,000 years ago, and now they claim that there are 7 millions descendents all over the world. Since the 2000s, the Wuli Mausoleum - claimed to be the First Mausoleum of the Tang clan, has caught the attention of the Dengzhou government, which has since been promoting this to the Tangs across the world. The local government is eager to preserve the Mausoleum and a preservation plan has been announced; some Tang descendants have made substantial donations towards the project. This ethnographic study explores the nature of the transregional connections on heritage management and the meanings of building a global "Tang heritage" among three regional Tang groups, namely in Dengcun (Henan Province), Hong Kong and Toronto. This study addresses the following questions: Why are the local government and some Tangs willing to spend enormous sums of money on the conservation of the Mausoleum, while others refuse to do so? What are the socio-cultural, economic, political and religious factors facilitating the promotion or denial of the Tang heritage in today's globalized world? The ultimate goal of this research is to understand the politics and power dynamics among various stakeholders in the process of heritage management through a construction of transregional connections in post-Mao China. ; Detailed summary in vernacular field only. ; Chan, Hiu Ling. ; Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2012. ; Includes bibliographical references (leaves 146-153). ; Abstracts also in Chinese. ; List of Illustrations ; Abstract ; 摘要 ; Acknowledgement ...

Lee, Chui Mei. ; Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2009. ; Includes bibliographical references (leaves 171-185). ; Abstracts in English and Chinese. ; Abstract ; 提要 --- p.vi ; Acknowledgement --- p.vii ; Chapter Chapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1 ; Chapter 1.1 --- Urban Renewal and Heritage Conservation in Hong Kong --- p.2 ; Chapter 1.2 --- The Blue House Complex Revitalization Project --- p.9 ; Chapter 1.3 --- Fieldsite Specification: Why the Blue House Complex in Hong Kong? --- p.14 ; Chapter 1.4 --- Introduction of the Blue House Complex Community-led Conservation Movement --- p.16 ; Chapter Chpater 2 --- Literature Review --- p.18 ; Chapter 2.1 --- Construction of Heritage --- p.19 ; Chapter 2.2 --- Uses of Heritage --- p.21 ; Chapter 2.3 --- Community in Heritage Conservation --- p.26 ; Chapter 2.4 --- Politics in Heritage Conservation --- p.29 ; Chapter 2.5 --- Heritage Conservation in Hong Kong Urban Renewal --- p.36 ; Chapter Chapter 3 --- Objectives and Methodology --- p.39 ; Chapter 3.1 --- Objectives --- p.39 ; Chapter 3.2 --- Methodology --- p.40 ; Chapter 3.3 --- Ethical Concerns --- p.48 ; Chapter Chapter 4 --- The Blue House Complex --- p.50 ; Chapter 4.1 --- History of Wan Chai --- p.51 ; Chapter 4.2 --- History of Stone Nullah Lane and the Blue House Complex --- p.53 ; Chapter 4.2.1 --- Stone Nullah Lane --- p.53 ; Chapter 4.2.2 --- History of the Blue House Complex --- p.56 ; Chapter 4.3 --- Architectural Features and Specific Lifestyles in the Blue House Complex --- p.59 ; Chapter 4.4 --- Lifestyle of Current Residents in the Blue House Complex --- p.60 ; Chapter 4.5 --- The Demographics of the Blue House Complex --- p.63 ; Chapter 4.6 --- Economic Structure of the Blue House Complex --- p.66 ; Chapter 4.7 --- Social Structure of the Blue House Complex --- p.70 ; Chapter 4.8 --- Cultural Significance of the Blue House Complex --- p.76 ; Chapter 4.9 --- Various Interpretations of the Blue House Complex --- p.78 ; Chapter 4.9.1 --- Interpretation of the Antiquities Advisory ...

Agriculture, Rural village and Peasants (ARP) represent the production structure, social structure and cultural structure (3S) of rural China for thousands of years in its trinity. To find the long roots of Chinese civilization and to feel the creativity, splendour, diversity and regionality of Chinese traditional culture, it must be in the countryside relating to the ARP. However, China's rural areas have been constantly challenged by political, economic, technological changes and other cultures interruption. Especially after decades of modernization and urbanization, the three structural relationships of rural traditional harmony are gradually being resolved. The originality of the rural tradition and the cultural accumulation it bears are facing extinction. For a nation whose culture has been passed down for thousands of years, this will be an irreparable and huge loss. Fortunately, in 2005 the central government put forward the slogan of "Beautiful Villages", emphasizing the need to build beautiful and livable villages for farmers. The government's authorities have issued a series of support policies for this purpose. The national standard for "Beautiful Villages" was introduced in 2015. It supports the village protection and development plans for the newly established list of traditional Chinese villages and supports the pilots of rescue protection in various places. It requires traditional villages to rely on historical and cultural resources reasonably to carry out various development models such as cultural creativity, popular science education and leisure tourism. From the macro-level of management, it is proposed that government-led, government-invested, unified planning, development, management, management and management rights should be unified. At the same time as the promotion of cultural relics protection and basic implementation, attention is paid to protecting the interests of the people and social benefits. Over the past years, all sectors of society, including some enterprises and institutions, have responded positively, forming various forms of practice in rural villages protection and development. For example "characteristic vernacular villages", "characteristic folk villages", "modern new villages", "historical ancient villages", etc. They mainly make some useful attempts to solve various problems faced by the countryside through the combination of rural tourism, leisure agriculture and ecological agriculture. However, most of these practices are based on direct input from external funds and management. Many of them fail to reach out to the current issues of the ARP, and unable to face the problems of a poor 3S relationship. Therefore, how to combine the protection of the "post-cultural heritage" of the countryside with the exploration of the new form of the ARP and reconstruction of the 3S relationship under the new historical conditions and opportunities has become the theoretical and practical issues of rural protection and development. To realize the goal of "Beautiful Villages", it is very necessary to take action at both levels of strategic thinking and practical approach. It is necessary to make forward-looking explorations and practices in accordance with the actual conditions of rural areas in different regions.