National Socialism in Japan
In: Pacific affairs, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 311
ISSN: 0030-851X
250 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Pacific affairs, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 311
ISSN: 0030-851X
In: American political science review, Band 36, S. 460-470
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: American political science review, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 460-470
ISSN: 1537-5943
Next to Hegel and Nietzsche, Fichte is the German philosopher most frequently blamed as one of the principal inspirers of the National Socialist ideologies of state despotism and the superiority of the German people. Indeed, it is not difficult to find in Fichte's work any number of passages which might be interpreted in such a way as to corroborate these views. In the writings of his middle period, around 1800, Fichte arrives at a despotism of reason which in its practical application might be even more consistently restraining than the rule of our modern dictators. In his programmatic speeches for the restoration of the German nation, he ascribes to his people a divine mission which has shocked many of his interpreters. Therefore we cannot be surprised that historians who, in accordance with the demands of their profession, lay more stress on the effects of thoughts and actions than on the intentions which motivate them, attribute to Fichte a good share of responsibility for the ideology of the National Socialist party and its hold on the German people. Yet these historians are right only with regard to the external form, while the intended aims of the two systems of thought are diametrically opposed to one another.On the whole, Fichte is a moral idealist whose principal concerns are the political and inner freedom of the individual, the right and duty of the individual to contribute his best to the welfare and the cultural progress of his nation, the independence of all nationalities, social security, and an acceptable standard of living for every human being. These demands are based on a genuine respect for the dignity of man and the desire to contribute to the rule of humanitarian values in all human relations. The National Socialist, on the contrary, is fundamentally an egotistic materialist, a ruthless Herrenmensch, with a deep-rooted contempt for freedom, equality, and all humanitarian values.
In: American political science review, Band 54, S. 921-933
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: International affairs, Band 19, Heft 6-7, S. 415-415
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Journal of political economy, Band 50, S. 805-835
ISSN: 0022-3808
In: International affairs, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 411-411
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: American political science review, Band 54, Heft 4, S. 921-933
ISSN: 1537-5943
Attempts to establish a "morphology of civilizations" seem to continue in spite of dire warnings from scholars. Indeed, while rejecting Toynbee and Sorokin with one hand, many a scholar has beckoned with the other to adventurous young men to leave the barren tracts of specialization and re-enter the broad panoramic fields of Weltgeschichte. Current interest in "comparative feudal institutions" illustrates the case in point.The notion that "feudalism" is a "form of society," especially a "stage in development," can be traced back to Marxist historiography, and from there back to eighteenth century French thinkers. But instead of becoming thoroughly discredited, the notion has recently led to new thinking on the subject which may turn out to be fruitful. In Feudalism in History for example, Rushton Coulborn, has combined eight separate papers on feudalism in various parts of the world by different historians, with his own critical and synthetic studies. Though he fails to find even one "fully developed" feudal society according to his own definition—a not unexpected result—his study contains an amazing amount of suggestive analysis.His suggestions are particularly valuable in the construction of "working models" or "ideal types" as research tools. Even when we remain safely within our own "fields," if we are to go beyond highly specialized fact-gathering and at the same time avoid "presentisi subjectivism," we will need such tools.
In: American political science review, Band 54, Heft 4
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: Journal of Central European affairs, Band 3, S. 52-64
ISSN: 0885-2472
In: Journal of political economy, Band 50, Heft 6, S. 805-835
ISSN: 1537-534X