Missions militaries italiennes a l'etranger: la proliferation des hybrides
In: Cultures et Conflits, Heft 67
67800 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Cultures et Conflits, Heft 67
In: Risk analysis: an international journal, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 585-596
ISSN: 1539-6924
Decisions are made to achieve objectives. A qualitative list of the objectives for a decision is the foundation for a value model that unambiguously represents objectives in a quantitative manner. The objectives guide thinking and the value model provides a basis for analyzing alternatives to best meet the desired objectives. This article illustrates the usefulness of clearly identifying objectives and developing value models to support anti‐terrorism analysis. It outlines procedures to develop value models for the Department of Homeland Security and for terrorist organizations. The later is useful to both design anti‐terrorism alternatives and suggest possible terrorist priorities and actions. An example that develops a terrorist value model for the theft and misuse of plutonium is presented. Several uses of value models for anti‐terrorist activities are discussed and suggestions for developing such value models are outlined.
In: Cultures et Conflits, Heft 67
In: Policing and society: an international journal of research and policy, Band 17, Heft 3, S. 239-256
ISSN: 1477-2728
In: Patterns of prejudice: a publication of the Institute for Jewish Policy Research and the American Jewish Committee, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 45-60
ISSN: 1461-7331
In: Sistema: revista de ciencias sociales, Heft 193, S. 121-129
ISSN: 0210-0223
In: Análisis político: revista del Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Relaciones Internacionales, Band 19, Heft 58
ISSN: 0121-4705
In: Análisis político: revista del Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Relaciones Internacionales, Band 19, Heft 58
ISSN: 0121-4705
In: Análisis político: revista del Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Relaciones Internacionales, Band 19, Heft 58
ISSN: 0121-4705
Shortly after the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States, India passed its own anti-terrorism ordinance, the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), following a terrorist attack on India's Parliament building in December 2001. As with the USA PATRIOT Act, Indian legislators acted quickly, declaring the Act to be a necessary weapon against terrorism. But POTA, like the USA PATRIOT Act, had detractors, who criticized the law as unnecessary and draconian. Among other potentially dangerous measures, POTA allowed for 180-day detentions without charge, presumptions of guilt, sketchy review procedures, summary trials and trials in absentia. In many ways, POTA was harsher than the USA PATRIOT Act, but then again, so is India's terrorist threat. In September 2004, a new central government repealed POTA, but other vigorous antiterror laws are likely to follow. This Note evaluates the most dangerous provisions of POTA, how officials abused those provisions, and what lessons India and the United States can learn from the experience.
BASE
In: European journal of international law, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 561-577
ISSN: 1464-3596
In: Lateinamerika-Analysen, Heft 8, S. 137-164
ISSN: 1619-1684
In: Strategic review for Southern Africa: Strategiese oorsig vir Suider-Afrika, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 23-38
ISSN: 1013-1108
In: International journal of urban and regional research: IJURR, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 201-211
ISSN: 0309-1317
Shipping list no.: 2005-0099-P. ; Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche. ; "Printed for the use of the Committee on Governmental Affairs." ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE