The Nature of Party Government
In: Revista española de ciencia política, Heft 6, S. 235-236
ISSN: 1575-6548
In: Revista española de ciencia política, Heft 6, S. 235-236
ISSN: 1575-6548
The paper formulates an understanding of the penal nature of the punishment, based on the essential aspect of the subject of the penal law and its positive impact on it. It is proved that the defining property of its subject is the public danger, serving the sentence of the convicted person. The provisions and norms of the penitentiary law, by means of which the convict is influenced, are corrective in nature. The proposed content of the legal nature allowed us to reveal the criterion of the system, the branch of law under consideration, the organic interrelation of its provisions and norms with solving problems and achieving goals. Such a criterion is the degree of public danger of a person serving a sentence imposed by the court, executed by the relevant criminal enforcement agencies. On the one hand, it materially "connects" the branch of law under consideration with criminal law, on the other, it gives them independence. The study of the problem of the penitentiary function of punishment, taking into account the revealed nature of its penitentiary, has made it possible to state that punishment is valuable in the system of provisions and norms of criminal executive law. All of this is aimed not at punishment, but at ensuring its serving and execution, within the framework of criminal-executive legal relations. At the same time, it is not punishment, but its essence in the form of a good, specified by the court's verdict by type, volume, time, is served and executed. The content of this process, its focus form a criminal-executive function, based on a certain degree of social danger of the convict. The "job" of the function is to stop the public danger of the convict as much as possible, creating the conditions for achieving the goal of the criminal executive legislation to correct the criminal.
BASE
El presente ensayo reflexiona acerca de las distintas perspectivas conceptuales de lo que entendemos por Naturaleza y cómo ellas configuran nuestra realidad y nuestros quehaceres colectivos. Esta reflexión parte desde el ámbito artístico para después incorporar aspectos de la ecología política en la dialéctica Humano/Naturaleza, enfatizándo los puntos comunes y las intersecciones que consideramos interesantes. Tomamos tres ejemplos en la historia del arte reciente en donde identificamos las problemáticas conceptuales en torno a la configuración de la idea de lo natural. Primero desarrollaremos aspectos de la intersección entre arte y ciencia en los proyectos enciclopédicos y el impacto de la cartografía como la imagen que encarna dicha intersección. El segundo ejemplo presenta una mirada renovada hacia lo natural con el paisaje entrópico de Robert Smithson. El tercer ejemplo, la obra de Stelarc, reconfigura "Lo Natural" ante el impacto tecnológico de la civilización. Estas referencias nos sirven para ilustrar y desarrollar el debate de las ideas en la contemporaneidad acerca de la construcción cultural de la Naturaleza a través del arte y cómo este debate toma forma y es difundido por canales políticos que comparten o resisten los programas del poder para la permanente configuración de las representaciones del mundo. Abstract This essay reflects on the different conceptual perspectives of what we understand by Nature and how they shape our reality and our collective tasks. This reflection starts from the artistic field and then incorporates aspects of political ecology in the Human / Nature dialectic, emphasizing the common points and the intersections that we consider interesting. We take three examples in the history of recent art where we identify the conceptual problems around the configuration of the idea of the natural. First, we will develop aspects of the intersection between art and science in encyclopedic projects and the impact of cartography as the image that embodies this intersection. The second example presents a renewed look towards the natural with the entropic landscape of Robert Smithson. The third example, the artwork of Stelarc, reconfigures the Natural before the technological impact of human development. These references serve to illustrate and develop the debate of contemporary ideas about the cultural construction of Nature through art and how this debate takes shape and is disseminated through political channels that share or resist the programs of power for the permanent configuration of the representations of the world. ; This essay reflects on the different conceptual perspectives of what we understand by Nature and how they shape our reality and our collective tasks. This reflection starts from the artistic field and then incorporates aspects of political ecology in the Human / Nature dialectic, emphasizing the common points and the intersections that we consider interesting. We take three examples in the history of recent art where we identify the conceptual problems around the configuration of the idea of the natural. First, we will develop aspects of the intersection between art and science in encyclopedic projects and the impact of cartography as the image that embodies this intersection. The second example presents a renewed look towards the natural with the entropic landscape of Robert Smithson. The third example, the artwork of Stelarc, reconfigures the Natural before the technological impact of human development. These references serve to illustrate and develop the debate of contemporary ideas about the cultural construction of Nature through art and how this debate takes shape and is disseminated through political channels that share or resist the programs of power for the permanent configuration of the representations of the world.
BASE
En este artículo defiendo que existe una «teleogología política» en Aristóteles que está estrechamente relacionada con su teleología natural. A través de la teleología natural el filósofo justifica un orden político de dominación y subyugacion, en el que la mayor parte de la población queda excluida de la ciudadanía debido a la falta de virtud. Las vidas de los trabajadores manuals, ya sean mujeres, esclavos o miembros masculinos de la población libres, carecen de validez de acuerdo a los criterios más elevados que Aristóteles considera necesarios para la ciudadanía. El objetivo de la población trabajadora es servir a formas más elevadas de existencia, a la vida de la clase dirigente.
BASE
In: Monografías. Historia y arte
In: UFZ-Bericht 2003,17
In: Stadtökologische Forschungen 36
This paper aims to elaborate upon Pope Benedict's speech to the Bundestag in September 2011, just as he Himself suggests doing. The core of the discourse is the foundation of Law or the fundamental issue of its philosophy: Justice (which is the response from iusnaturalism to the question about such principle). With Kelsen, what is and what ought to be were set apart and that had an adverse effect on their essence. On the contrary, Benedict XVI wants to return to the ancient and perennial notion of justice, the foundation of Law that understood the just thing as a trinomial composed of nature (what is), reason (what ought to be), and Spiritus Creator (support of reason and nature) and made justice more comprehensible. This is the starting point from which this paper intends to comment on in order to facilitate the understanding of Benedict XVI's ideas, basing His thoughts on the book by Leonardo Boff La opción tierra (Earth option). From our point of view this book approximates what is to what ought to be and from Boff's ecologist view poses some questions in the human level, particularly in the field of Law ; Se busca desarrollar el discurso del papa Benedicto XVI al Bundestag en septiembre de 2011, talcomo su autor invita a hacerlo. El centro del discurso es el fundamento del Derecho o asuntobásico de su filosofía: la justicia (respuesta iusnaturalista a la pregunta sobre tal fundamento).Con Kelsen, el Derecho separó el ser del deber ser, afectando de manera negativa su esencia. Benedicto XVI, por el contrario, quiere volver al ancestral y perenne concepto de justicia que cimenta el Derecho, que veía lo justo como un trinomio compuesto de naturaleza (ser), razón (deber ser) y Spiritus Creator (sustento de razón y naturaleza), que hacía de la justicia algo más comprensible. Desde ahí se pretende hacer algunas glosas que faciliten la comprensión del pensamiento de Benedicto XVI, apoyando el pensamiento papal en el escrito de Leonardo Bofftitulado La opción Tierra, libro que, a mi juicio, acerca el ser al deber ser y sugiere desde esapostura ecologicista boffiana algunos interrogantes en el plano humano, más concretamenteen el terreno del Derecho.
BASE
Se busca desarrollar el discurso del papa Benedicto XVI al Bundestag en septiembre de 2011, tal como su autor invita a hacerlo. El centro del discurso es el fundamento del Derecho o asunto básico de su filosofía: la justicia (respuesta iusnaturalista a la pregunta sobre tal fundamento). Con Kelsen, el Derecho separó el ser del deber ser, afectando de manera negativa su esencia. Benedicto XVI, por el contrario, quiere volver al ancestral y perenne concepto de justicia que cimenta el Derecho, que veía lo justo como un trinomio compuesto de naturaleza (ser), razón (deber ser) y Spiritus Creator (sustento de razón y naturaleza), que hacía de la justicia algo más comprensible. Desde ahí se pretende hacer algunas glosas que faciliten la comprensión del pensamiento de Benedicto XVI, apoyando el pensamiento papal en el escrito de Leonardo Boff titulado La opción Tierra, libro que, a mi juicio, acerca el ser al deber ser y sugiere desde esa postura ecologicista boffiana algunos interrogantes en el plano humano, más concretamente en el terreno del Derecho. ; This paper aims to elaborate upon Pope Benedict's speech to the Bundestag in September 2011, just as he Himself suggests doing. The core of the discourse is the foundation of Law or the fundamental issue of its philosophy: Justice (which is the response from iusnaturalism to the question about such principle). With Kelsen, what is and what ought to be were set apart and that had an adverse effect on their essence. On the contrary, Benedict XVI wants to return to the ancient and perennial notion of justice, the foundation of Law that understood the just thing as a trinomial composed of nature (what is), reason (what ought to be), and Spiritus Creator (support of reason and nature) and made justice more comprehensible. This is the starting point from which this paper intends to comment on in order to facilitate the understanding of Benedict XVI's ideas, basing His thoughts on the book by Leonardo Boff La opción tierra (Earth option). From our point of view this book approximates what is to what ought to be and from Boff's ecologist view poses some questions in the human level, particularly in the field of Law.
BASE
In: Rencontres de philosophie médiévale 16
This report provides the guiding framework for cities to transform their relationship with nature and to drive an urban development that leaves natural capital enriched and not depleted, a vision that the Colombian government has defined as "BiodiverCities". Building on this country's leadership, the World Economic Forum and Colombia have partnered to scale a global initiative with a major ambition: BiodiverCities by 2030. We have the opportunity to design more resilient and adaptive futures for cities across the globe by drawing together multidisciplinary expertise and spurring nature-positive entrepreneurial approaches in the next decade. We encourage city officials, the private sector and the whole urban community to harvest and spread the evidence on the real opportunities for cities to reverse their impact on nature and to build an enabling environment in their own city contexts whereby biodiversity and nature-based solutions are brought to the centre of the urban agenda. ; Bogotá D.C.
BASE
Reseña del libro: Catrin Gersdorf and Juliane Braun, eds., "America after Nature: Democracy, Culture, Environment" (Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2016), 485 pp.
BASE
This article is an approach to the issue of the coloniality of nature, an issue that today has reached a breaking point in which the conditions of life themselves, especially the access to genetic structures and the political conditions that determine them are being questioned —paradoxically—, as a result of the extraordinary advances in science. A reflection from the aesthetic perspective, as the one shown here, allows us to say that these processes, in which the life of the planet is at stake, cannot be carried out without a discussion in terms of politics, ethics and options of civilization, to be developed in the field of aesthetics and the sensible. ; Este artículo es una aproximación al problema de la colonialidad de la naturaleza, que alcanza en la actualidad un punto límite en el que se ponen en cuestión las condiciones mismas de la vida, paradójicamente, como resultado de los extraordinarios avances de la ciencia, en términos del acceso a las estructuras genéticas y de las condiciones políticas que la determinan. Una reflexión desde una perspectiva estética, como la nuestra, nos permite afirmar que estos procesos en los que se pone en juego la vida en el planeta no pueden darse al margen de una discusión, en términos éticos, políticos y de opciones civilizatorias, que tenga lugar en el campo de lo sensible y las estéticas.
BASE
In: RVAP 54; Revista Vasca de Administración Pública / Herri-Arduralaritzarako Euskal Aldizkaria, Heft 54, S. 283-334
ISSN: 2695-5407