Openness
In: Administration & society, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 118-121
ISSN: 0095-3997
6140 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Administration & society, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 118-121
ISSN: 0095-3997
In: Journal of public policy, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 215
ISSN: 1469-7815
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: Peace research abstracts journal, Band 44, Heft 5, S. 215-216
ISSN: 0031-3599
In: Adoption & fostering: quarterly journal, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 63-63
ISSN: 1740-469X
In: Adoption & fostering: quarterly journal, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 21-26
ISSN: 1740-469X
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Human relations: towards the integration of the social sciences, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 229-243
ISSN: 1573-9716, 1741-282X
The openness movement that started in the 1940's with the invention of the T-group has lost much of its momentum. The movement's excesses and abuses have discredited openness in its pure form to the point where anything resembling a T-group is verboten in many organizations, and many of its original champions have become disenchanted with it. What of the original form of openness can be or should be salvaged?
In: New left review: NLR, Heft 89, S. 89-102
ISSN: 0028-6060
WHO COULD OBJECT to 'open innovation'? The term, which has migrated from software development to become a staple of business-management strategy, seems to conjure the most desirable aspects of contemporary American capitalism: freedom, creativity, democratic accessibility, the possibility of new frontiers. The 'openness' paradigm promises to combine new production systems, made possible by the technologies of Web 2.0 and the shrunken space of globalization, with novel forms of business organization and value extraction; it offers a powerful weapon in inter-firm competition and a new regime of labour. The paradigm has been promoted by a torrent of books and articles from us business schools over the past decade. In 2003 a Google search for 'open innovation' brought up 200 results, according to Henry Chesbrough, one of the gurus of the field and Director of the Centre for Open Innovation at Berkeley's Hass Business School. By 2013, the figure was 672,000,000. Adapted from the source document.
In: The B.E. journal of economic analysis & policy, Band 8, Heft 1
ISSN: 1935-1682
Abstract
We report an intriguing empirical observation. The relationship between corruption and output depends on the economy's degree of openness: in open economies, corruption and GNP per capita are strongly negatively correlated, but closed economies display no relationship at all. This stylized fact is robust to a variety of different empirical specifications. In particular, the same basic pattern persists if we use alternative measures of openness, if we focus on different time periods, if we restrict the sample to include only highly corrupt countries, and if we restrict attention to specific geographic areas or to poor countries. We find that the degree of financial openness is primarily what determines whether corruption and output are correlated. Moreover, corruption is negatively related to capital accumulation in open economies, but not in closed economies. We present a model, consistent with these findings, in which the main channel through which corruption affects output is capital drain.
In: Oxford Handbook of International Organizations, edited by Jacob Katz Cogan, Ian Hurd, and Ian Johnstone. Oxford University Press, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: The new leader: a biweekly of news and opinion, Band 89, Heft 1-2, S. 35-37
ISSN: 0028-6044