Suchergebnisse

Today, U.S. Army commanders and the military lawyers assigned to advise them—Army Judge Advocates—find themselves operating in areas of extreme legal complexity, where nuanced political and strategic implications are often at the forefront, and where "black letter law" is rarely sufficient to render competent advice. Through formal training at The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School, observance of the lessons learned by other Judge Advocates collected by the Center for Law and Military Operations, and hands-on training at Combat Training Centers, Army Judge Advocates are prepared to address the ever-increasing operational demands of the commanders who rely on their advice.

The organization and functioning of military and ecclesiastical bodies also attract the legal assumption of missions executed for and in favor of the nations and denominations represented, for each of them or in an alliance system, having to observe the norms of operational and canonical law on which we will reflect through What's next.Keywords: belligerent standardization; interoperability; decident; apostolic; canonical; religious-moral; dogmatic; ecumenical; patristic; liturgical; sacramental.

Operational law, which emerged to regulate the public force's operations, is a recent branch of law on whose definition and delimitation there are insufficient contributions. This article sets out to determine what operational law is in light of its relationship with human rights and international humanitarian law. First, the concept is described from a legal, jurisprudential, and doctrinal perspective to understand its characteristics and various conceptions. Then, the concepts of human rights and international humanitarian law are characterized to underline their nature, content, and application scope. Finally, it analyzes how operational law relates to both concepts while identifying their differences to provide a delineated definition. ; El derecho operacional, surgido para regular las operaciones de la fuerza pública, es una rama reciente del derecho sobre cuya definición y delimitación no hay suficientes aportes. Este artículo se propone determinar qué es el derecho operacional a la luz de su relación con los derechos humanos y el derecho internacional humanitario. Primero, se describe el concepto desde la perspectiva legal, jurisprudencial y doctrinal, con el fin de comprender sus características y diversas concepciones. Luego se caracterizan los conceptos de derechos humanos y derecho internacional humanitario, para resaltar su naturaleza, su contenido y su ámbito de aplicación. Finalmente, se analiza cómo el derecho operacional se relaciona con ambos conceptos, al tiempo que se identifican sus diferencias con ellos, para brindar una definición delimitada.

This investigation seeks to vindicate the importance of constructing, as an object of study, a category of law called operational law, to contribute to the socio-juridical debate of the relations that arise or occur in the actions of the Public Force, understood these as Military Forces and National Police. In that sense, it is completely plausible to build a whole knowledge around the normative imperatives that regulate the procedures of military and police institutions, respectively. Thus, an attempt is made to make an approximation to the axial or defining axes of this legal arrangement and that, eventually, it could give deep explanations to phenomena of the social environment and that are related to the containment of the threats of a society. Finally, the document proposes an analysis of validity and effectiveness of the operational rules, given their administrative roots, justifying them as a principle of lex artis of the science and art of military operations and police operations. ; La presente investigación pretende reivindicar la importancia de construir, como objeto de estudio, una categoría del derecho denominada derecho operacional[1], con el fin de contribuir al debate socio-jurídico de las relaciones que se suscitan o se producen en las actuaciones de la Fuerza Pública, entendidas estas como Fuerzas Militares y Policía Nacional. En ese sentido, resulta completamente plausible construir todo un conocimiento entorno a los imperativos normativos que reglan los procedimientos de las instituciones castrense y policial, respectivamente. Así, se procura realizar una aproximación a los ejes axiales o definitorios de esta ordenación jurídica y que, eventualmente, podría dar explicaciones profundas a fenómenos del entorno social y que se relacionan con la contención de las amenazas de una sociedad. Finalmente, el documento propone un análisis de validez y eficacia de las reglas operacionales, dada su raigambre administrativa, justificándolas como principio de lex artis de la ciencia, el arte de las operaciones militares y los operativos policiales. [1] En adelante DOPER