Suchergebnisse

Mangels Aktualität erfolgte, zumindest in der Rechtswissenschaft, lange Zeit keine Beschäftigung mit Pandemien bzw. deren rechtlicher Regelung. Insbesondere durch SARS, die Vogelgrippe und die sogenannte Schweinegrippe wurde der breiten Öffentlichkeit, Gesundheitspolitik, Behörden, der Medizin und der Rechtswissenschaft die Relevanz von Pandemien vor Augen geführt. Eine wirksame Pandemievorsorge und Bekämpfung ist von existentieller Bedeutung.Der Band dokumentiert die interdisziplinäre wissenschaftliche Tagung "Pandemien als Herausforderung für die Rechtsordnung" des Forschungszentrums Katastrophenrecht unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. Michael Kloepfer. Die Problematik der Pandemievorsorge bzw. Bekämpfung wird aus medizinischen, juristischen, gesundheitsbehördlichen und politischen Blickwinkeln untersucht. Neben der kritischen Darstellung des rechtlichen Rahmens durch das Infektionsschutzrecht und die Pandemieplanung werden unter anderem Fragen der Pandemieprävention durch medizinische Maßnahmen, die Problematik des Impfkostenstreits sowie das Brisanz der Verteilung knapper medizinischer Güter – sogenannte infektionsschutzrechtliche Triage behandelt.

Rules of the General Assembly of Judges of the Supreme Administrative Court of Chamber, distribution of case files and transfer of cases, performance of official functions, challenge of administrative judges, performance of functions of administrative case officials, and power of attorney in administrative case proceedings, B. E. 2544 (2001)

Cover Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- List of Illustrations -- About the Authors -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Understanding Administrative Burden -- 2. The Resurgence of Burdens in Voting: Race, Burdens, and Access to Political Rights -- 3. False Claims and Targeted Burdens: The Case of Abortion Restrictions -- 4. The Affordable Care Act: Federalism as a Source of Burdens -- 5. Negotiating the Medicare Maze -- 6. Bipartisan Fixes and Partisan Blame: Cycles of Burdens in SNAP -- 7. Mending Medicaid: The Politics of Shifting Burdens at the State Level -- 8. The Earned Income Tax Credit: Benefiting Business by Reducing Burdens on the Working Poor -- 9. Social Security: How the Biggest Bookkeeping Organization in the World Banished Burdens -- 10. Toward an Evidence-Based Approach to Administrative Burden -- Notes -- References -- Index

The subject of this research is about the noted improvement of the international systems towards the consideration of compensation for the service damage without the necessity of committing an error as a condition in all cases, but rather acting in accordance with justice and equality against general encumbrances. The Administrative Compensation was not applied in our Jordanian system, then its improvement was identified on the basis of only the tort and committing an administrative error as a condition, so we decided to make this research in order to achieve a dual benefit; first benefit is: 1- simplify the current Jordanian system, in the way that elaborates the system conditions and restrictions in the field of Compensation for the service damage, second benefit is: 2- clarify the original rules of other preceding comparative systems in such field to the extent of the compensation for the service damage as well even if without committing an error, so, this comparison becomes a proper preliminary step in the process of improving our current Jordanian system. Hereupon, this research is divided into three chapters as follow; The First Chapter: "The field of Administrative Compensation and its relation with the Civil and Administrative Laws". Which consists of two parts and four requests, where the research discusses the basic rules of the civil liability in compensation, in terms of the both basic rules or the exceptions, and also the Administrative rules in such compensation, in terms of both the compensation for the service error or the compensation for the service damage. The Second Chapter: "The Restrictions on the Administrative Compensation" Which also consists of two parts and four requests, where the research discusses these restrictions, either in terms of legal restrictions; (acts of sovereignty and acts of the legislative and judicial authorities) or the pragmatic restrictions; (Prerogatives of public and administrative discretion powers and the exceptional conditions and how they affect in such area). The Third Chapter: "The Administrative Liability in the Jordanian System" Which also consists of two parts and four requests, where the research discusses the compensation for the service error in the Jordanian system and its relation to the personal error, and also the statement of limiting this system not only to the point of the tort in the field of the Administrative Compensation, beside, but also the limitation of this liability with different legal, pragmatic and judicial restrictions. These chapters are followed by a conclusion and recommendations, through which we elucidated the summary of what we achieved in our research and the recommendations we call for.