Suchergebnisse

The article aims to represent the correlation between war and peace in modern Ukrainian society. The author analyzes Ukraine's social processes, which diminished the country's social organism in peaceful times, intensified its contradictions and fostered a military conflict, taking into consideration the specifics of modern warfare, theoretical interpretation of the conceptual power phenomenon and the concept of nation' lifestyle. The analysis of social changes in modern Ukraine should be considered in the light of modern ideas about war and its aims, which are achieved with the help of political, organizational, financial, economic, ideological, cultural, informational and other means based on the same principle as secret services and intelligence use. Experts (M. Senchenko) consider every astonishing factor as a carefully designed program of invasion into the social body similar to virus with further damaging and destroying the lifestyle and life sustenance of people, society and state. One should study the correlation between war and peace in Ukraine in the context of including the Ukrainian society into the "super-society", the impact of such a social phenomenon as a conceptual power. Experts (I. Solonko) regard it as the power of people able to generate social processes, covering the life of society during many generations and proceed according to the developed concept.The management of the Ukrainian society after gaining the independence was carried out according to a foreign concept. The market-style reforms of 90-s based on the model of M. Friedman and Friedrich Hayek prove that. They ruined the economic system and caused the drop in Gross Domestic Product nearly in 2.5 times by 2000. After their beginning the Ukrainian society is suffering from the permanent systemic crisis; the reforms have led to a demographic crisis and recognition of the Ukrainian people as "dying nation". The implementation of these reforms involves foreign advisors who destroyed the economy of Ukraine, thus giving way to foreign multinationals, while Ukrainian authorities constantly ignored national interests of their people. Besides, the priority of foreign policy integration led to social and cultural stratification of the society; Ukrainian political leaders failed to develop their own concept of governance. Neoliberal reforms in Ukraine significantly transformed people, society and public awareness. Under the circumstances of transition from the state dominance to the market dominance the process of social development in Ukraine turned into the economic and social destruction. The commercialization affected all the spheres of public life in Ukraine, even those where this process is destructive for the society (public authorities, state administration, defense system, national security, law enforcement bodies). Now the type of "economic man" or "man without world view" dominates. Due to the market reforms the cult of money (Mammon) became firmly established in the lives of many Ukrainian citizens. "Mammonizm" appears as Ukraine's dominant ideology. So, the transition to the market dominance and mammonizm created a certain social environment in the society, favourable for war. An intensive illegal trade between belligerents; the enrichment of some groups of people in the war; the emergence of private military companies; the involvement of hired military men for combat prove that fact. The mass-media continue the war of images even in the period of truce, thus fulfilling the will of certain ruling circles. Thus, the process of transformation of the Ukrainian society was based on works of Western theorists and involved foreign advisors. It was carried out for the benefit of foreign trans-national companies contrary to the national interests. Besides, Ukraine's political elite was involved in destructing the current lifestyle and plundering national wealth. So, destructive processes occurred in all social spheres. The analysis mentioned above confirms they displayed a foreign conceptual power. The most important consequences of hidden war against Ukraine are: 1) its transformation into a dying nation and maintenance of this state; 2) the decline of economy, deintellectualization, deindustrialization and the loss of the status of a high-tech state; 3) the destruction of collectivist principles in social organization and the establishment of individualistic principles; 4) the promotion of historical and cultural type of "economic man" as dominant in the society; 5) the secret approval of mammonizm as the dominant ideology of the Ukrainian society. ; Опираясь на анализ специфики современной войны, концептуальной власти и жизнеустройства народа, автор исследует социальные процессы, которые ослабляли социальный организм Украины. Взаимосвязь войны и мира рассматривается в контексте процесса включения украинского общества в «сверхобщество». Управление украинским обществом периода независимости осуществлялось по чужой концепции. Рыночные реформы в Украине привели к глубинной трансформации человека, общества и общественного сознания. «Мамонизм» установился как господствующая идеология в Украине. ; Спираючись на аналіз специфіки сучасної війни, концептуальної влади та життєустрою народу, автор досліджує процеси, які послабляли соціальний організм України. Взаємозв'язок війни і миру розглядається в контексті включення українського суспільства в «надсуспільство». Управління українським суспільством періоду незалежності здійснювалося за чужою концепцією. Ринкові реформи в Україні призвели до глибинної трансформації людини, суспільства і суспільної свідомості. «Мамонізм» постав як панівна ідеологія в Україні.

The article discusses the concept of «pacifism» and the peace movement as one of the most influential parties in international politics. The formation of pacifism as an ideology and prevalent features of the world peace movement were examined. It was found that the pacifist movement unites people of different classes of society and different occupation, who represented the interests of the group, united around the problems of the peace and their own security. They opposed the armed clashes, taking actions, holding meetings and speeches. The authors give examples of various philosophers, politicians, intellectuals, writers and religious figures who popularized the ideas and values of pacifism. It is shown that as the role of international organizations in the global scene increases, pacifist movement forms into various international organizations, unions and associations. Basic principles of attaining peace were built on justice, mutual assistance, unity and protection of human rights. ; Статья посвящена рассмотрению понятия «пацифизм» и пацифистского движения как одного из влиятельных субъектов международной политики. Были рассмотрены формирование пацифизма как идеологии и особенность распространения пацифистского движения в мире. Было выявлено, что пацифистское движение объединяло людей разных слоев общества и сфер занятости, которые олицетворяли группу интересов, сплачивались вокруг проблем мира и собственной безопасности. Они выступали против вооруженных столкновений, проводя акции, выступления и митинги. Авторы приводят примеры деятельности различных философов, политиков, интеллектуалов, писателей и религиозных деятелей, которые популяризировали идеи и ценности пацифизма. Показано, что с ростом на мировой арене роли международных организаций пацифистское движение приобретает официальное оформление в различные международные организации, союзы и ассоциации. Основные принципы достижения мира строились на справедливости, взаимопомощи, единстве и защите прав человека. ; Статтю присвячено розгляду поняття «пацифізм» та пацифістського руху як одного зі впливових суб'єктів міжнародної політики. Було розглянуто етапи формування пацифізму як доктрини та поширення пацифістського руху у світі. Прослідковано, що пацифістський рух об'єднував людей різних прошарків суспільства та сфер зайнятості, які складали групу інтересів, що згуртовувалися навколо проблем миру і власної безпеки та виступали проти збройних сутичок, проводячи акції, виступи та мітинги. Автори наводять приклади діяльності різних філософів, політиків, інтелектуалів, письменників та релігійних лідерів, які популяризували ідеї та цінності пацифізму. Показано, що зі зростанням на світовій арені ролі міжнародних організацій, пацифістський рух набуває офіційного оформлення у вигляді міжнародних організацій, союзів та асоціацій.

His primary source, as a multimeaning word, term " violence" owes its roots in the audio – visual media from the definition of "culture war." Incorporating all the contradictory experience of mankind, its transformative lessons, it is no longer uniquely opposite category to the "culture of peace". Its philosophical and conceptual dimension is contradictory dialectiction, the transition from one quality to another, the dynamics of many aspects. Socio- psychological and socio- ethical aspects of these unilateral form cons screen "hero" with the aggressive nature, militaristic spirit, stereotyped image of the enemy Concept of "culture war" was created with UNESCO Declaration on the culture of peace, the Programme of Action in the field of culture of peace. Their aim – to promote a global movement of transition from a culture of war and violence to a culture of peace. Calls to non-violence in the third millennium able to generate values such as peacefulness, peace, tolerance, non- aggressive thinking and non-aggressive behavior. This new understanding of latitude amplitude of peacekeeping, not only between the public, but also socio-cultural group of countries with the highest regard first of all cultural and national characteristics.Staying within the human society, violence successfully took its place in the mass media content. Especially the "winner" of its location appears in audiovisual production. And not only the saturation of "pictures" on the screen, and the power of this form of human activity. Unfortunately, catharsis did not sacrifice public acquisition. It is a tribute to old versions mythologizing violence. However, against the fierce mythological character "naturalization of aggression and violence", modernity is characterized by specific manifestations of human cruelty. Erich Fromm called this situation "human passions", which are inherent to the social determinants of human being – violence.Multidirectional forms of violence caused by multitheoretical approaches to its understanding. There was some violence classification offered by Russian scientist G. Kozyrev: on violent forms of interaction, created loss, conflict subjects.Scientists identify as cultural violence "aspect of culture that can be used to legalize violence in its direct and structural forms".The genesis of the problems of violence clearly traced in the direction of contemporary audiovisual media content. The historical part of modern society, unfortunately, undoubtedly provided a constant value known as philosophical statements of Heraklit: " War – [polemos] – the father of all, the king of all: some it makes the gods, others – people, creates some slaves and some free ones", and according to Aristotle: "The violence is a coercion, and this is something that hinders and interferes in anything contrary to the wishes of necessity, so it is also harder". Political traditions, in particular, facilitate the transition to the monopolization of violence from government and law. The modern theory of violence makes an emphasis in the field of political philosophy. The world has embraced as a solid social arrangement. The philosopher Hobbes talks about the impossibility of peaceful coexistence of human existence by virtue of the nature of enmity to one another. This essence of human nature itself lies at the genetic, instinctive level. The idea that human existence is its natural law philosopher John Locke argued in "Two treatises of government".By "social contract" J. J. Rousseau theoretically grounded civil society, making an emphasis on the legal rights of the individual.Made by legal philosophers the foundation of violence laid today as the basis of the constitutional rights of many social groups. Only Kant was proclaimed the eternal law of peace and creation on the basis of its allied relations between people and nations. Here, "even the smallest state could expect their security and rights not from their own forces, but only from a great union of peoples".Dissonant sound of another philosopher actually equates the balance of world postulates on this topic: Hegel wrote: "The war keeps healthy morality of the people in relation to their indifferent certainty to their familiarity and rooting, just as the motion of the wind prevents the lake from the decay that threatens them with long-term comfort, as well as people – long, or, worse, eternal peace".J. Sorel in "Reflections on Violence" talks about proletarian violence: humanity and kindness is the promotion gimmicks that dominate market relations in society.Today, as reflected in the media and on video – modern society distinguishes its violence essence. But in fact the traditions are immutable: change only the type of offenders and their type of crime. Mass encountered in craftiness, they deserve in society more forgiving attitude. There is "a film adaptation of " artistic, journalistic, documentary works with a clear preponderance of violence in the images of intense creative images. Such "intellectuality" of the criminality was not yet known in the history of mass media, but now is widely seen in wars, terrorist attacks, social "squares". The sad conclusion of F. Furet, french historian: " If you add up the total list of famous authors who at different times were communists or sympathized with communism were the nazis or sympathized with fascism, then we get the current Gotha almanac of intellectual, scientific and literary elite".Everyday life is not worth to deduct to the dissatisfaction of culture. The new phenomenon is that modernity created between violence its hero. ; В статье анализируется понятие "насилие" в мас-медийном контексте, что однозначно указывает на его позиционирование как категории, противоположной "культуре мира". ; У статті аналізується поняття "насилля" у мас-медійному контексті, що однозначно вказує на його позиціонуванні як категорії, протилежній "культурі миру".

Investigated the problems of periodization of the history of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1996-2012. The changes in the political structure of Bosnia and Herzegovina are not provided Dayton Peace Agreement. ; Исследованы проблемы периодизации истории Боснии и Герцеговины в 1996-2012 гг. Рассмотрены изменения в политической структуре Боснии и Герцеговины, не предусмотренные Дейтонскими мирными соглашениями. ; Досліджено проблеми періодизації історії Боснії і Герцеговини у 1996-2012 рр. Розглянуто зміни в політичній структурі Боснії і Герцеговині, не передбачені Дейтонськими мирними угодами.

Зростаюча необхідність гуманітарних операцій ООН є результатом виникнення викликів, пов'язаних із різким збільшенням масштабу і складності надзвичайних подій та конфліктів. З іншого боку, сьогодні нові світові процеси стимулюють трансформацію миротворчих процедур і техніки посередництва з урахуванням проблем етнічного характеру, конфесійних протиріч та інших відмінностей. У зв'язку з цим операції із підтримання миру набувають особливого змісту, в результаті яких навіть можливі зміни політичних ситуацій всередині багатьох держав.Сучасний миротворчий процес є одним з найважливіших інтегральних компонентів глобальної діяльності держав світу. Участь України в миротворчих операціях і місіях ООН – важливий елемент її зовнішньополітичного курсу, спрямованого на реалізацію національних інтересів країни. Це дає змогу Україні швидше інтегруватися у світове співтовариство, сприяє зміцненню її міжнародного авторитету та виконанню нею найважливіших зобов'язань щодо зміцнення миру і міжнародної безпеки.Ключові слова: миротворча діяльність ООН; гуманітарні аспекти миротворчих операцій ООН; гуманітарна допомога в діяльності ООН; принципи проведення гуманітарних операцій. The growing need for UN humanitarian operations is a result of the challenges related to the sharp increase in the scale and complexity of emergencies and conflicts. On the other hand, today the new global processes stimulate the transformation of peace mediation procedures and technology to meet the challenges ethnicity, religious differences and other differences. In this regard, peacekeeping operations (operations of peacekeeping) take on special meaning, in which even the possible changes in the political situation in many countries.Modern peacekeeping process is a critical component of integrated global activities of the world. Ukraine's participation in peacekeeping operations and UN missions are an important element of its foreign policy, aimed at the realization of national interests. This allows you to quickly integrate Ukraine into the world community is strengthening its international authority and fulfillment of its most important commitments to strengthening peace and international security.Key words: UN peacekeeping; humanitarian aspects of UN peacekeeping operations; humanitarian assistance of the United Nations; the principles of humanitarian operations.

Розглянуто міжнародно-політичні наслідки агресії Російської Федерації проти України, що спричинили анексію частини української території і розгортання збройного конфлікту в двох східних областях України. Проаналізовано взаємозв'язок системних змін у сучасних міжнародних відносинах і викликів новітнього типу та тенденції, що загрожують стабільності і миру у сучасному світі.Ключові слова: конфлікт; агресія; врегулювання конфліктів; міжнародна безпека; транснаціоналізація. The article deals with the international political consequences of the Russian Federation aggression against Ukraine, which brought to the annexation of the part of sovereign Ukrainian territory and eruption of the conflict in two Eastern regions of Ukraine. The author analyzes the interconnection between the changes in modern international relations system, challenges of a new type and tendencies that endanger international stability and peace in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.Key word: conflict; aggression; conflict settlement; international security.

After the end of the Cold War and the formation of a multipolar world Scandinavian countries have chosen different ways, but one goal – to ensure the highest level of defense andsecurity in the region Northern Europe. Mastery of these countries in military peacekeeping missions during the Cold War provided the Scandinavian countries is not right to be the best in this area and the sharing of experiences with the countries that need modernizing the military. HighTrust international organizations to peacekeeping forces Scandinavians contributes to the further improvement and development of new models of high-quality military cooperation of different states to more successful peacekeeping missions in places of crises and conflcts.Nordic cooperation in security and defense found its embodiment in such models as cooperation NORDSAMFN (even during the Cold War), NORDCAPS and NORDEFKO. Transformation towards expansion and modernization of each of these associations took place based on a constant search for the most effective mechanisms to ensure a high level of coordination of military Scandinavia.An example of successful cooperation in the defense fild in northern Europe is NORDEFKO.The overall goal NORDEFCO on the military level – cooperation across the spectrum of defense structures to ensure greater cost effiiency and thus achieve the best quality. It means to have the ability to combine the individual possibilities to prevent any crisis. The aim is also combined with effective contribution to international efforts to ensure peace and security. Deep and comprehensive cooperation between the Nordic countries will increase its contribution to the development of peacekeeping forces and contribute to the consolidation efforts of the EU, NATO and the UN to stabilize conflct situations and possible prevention.Today the transformation of the international system and face new security challenges, as peace and world stability is one of the key requirements for today that the Scandinavian countries have very constructive opinion ; После окончания холодной войны и становления многополярного мира страны Скандинавии выбрали разные пути, но одну цель – обеспечение высокого уровня обороноспособности и безопасности в регионе Северной Европы. Доверие международных организаций к миротворческим контингентам скандинавов способствует дальнейшему совершенствованию и выработке новых качественных моделей сотрудничества военных разных стран для успешного выполнения миротворческих миссий в местах кризисов и конфликтов ; Після завершення холодної війни та становлення багатополярного світу країни Скандинавії обрали різні шляхи, але одну мету – забезпечення найвищого рівня обороноздатності та безпеки у регіоні Північної Європи. Довіра міжнародних організацій до миротворчих контингентів скандинавів сприяє подальшому вдосконаленню та виробленню нових якісних моделей співпраці військових різних держав задля успішнішого виконання миротворчих місій у місцях криз та конфліктів.

The urgent problem of modern international relations – complex peacekeepingcollective actions in conflct management and prevention including the proliferation of the conflctsand reduction of their negative impact on the separate countries and regions – are examined. Theessence of the types and kinds of peacekeeping operations is examined. Taking into account thatin the modern world there are many long-term and unresolved conflcts and of course they affectboth international relations and the situation in the separate countries and regions, it is importantto examine the value and the effectiveness of peacekeeping operations in modern internationalrelations. The article is aimed to examine the peacekeeping operations in modern internationalrelations. The author considers it appropriate to reveal the essence of peacemaking, types andkinds of peacekeeping operations as well as to examine the history of their conduct and to analyzecurrent international peacekeeping operations to summarize their rating. The essence of classicpeacekeeping operations and of the operations conducted under the auspices of internationalorganizations and separate countries is characterized. International relations and peacekeepingactivities in overcoming of the most dangerous conflcts in Libya and Syria are under consideration.It is proved that during the recent decades a number of comprehensive peace operations havebeen conducted, even with the use of the military component. Peacemaking is always a complexprocess that is associated with the preparation of making an important decision. The use of force orcoercion to peace is not a guarantee of freezing of the armed confrontation and human deaths. Viceversa, one can see on the example of Libya that fistly there was no unity according to the beginningof the military operation among the member countries of NATO. Second, there is still an armedconfrontation in Libya now continues to armed confrontation. Thirdly, the consequence of thedestabilization in the country was an illegal migration to the European Union. The last can affecta crisis in European countries. According to it, one can argue that there are no effective standardsworked out by the international community to settle armed conflcts for now. All this proves acontroversial importance of peacekeeping operations in modern international relations because onone hand they help to create the safer world, on the other hand they resulted in provoking furtherproblems and conflcts ; Рассмотрены миротворческие операции как актуальная проблема совре -менных международных отношений. Охарактеризованы виды и типы миротворческихопераций. Проанализированы наиболее небезопасные и масштабные конфликты современ -ности, такие как ливийский и сирийский. Обобщена эффективность и значение механизмовпо поддержанию мира и безопасности. ; Розглянуто миротворчі операції як актуальну проблему сучасних міжнародних відносин. Охарактеризовано види і типи міжнародних операцій. Проаналізовано найбільш небезпечні та масштабні конфлікти сучасності, такі як лівійський та сирійській. Узагальнено ефективність та значення діяльності світової спільноти з підтримання миру та безпеки

The maturity of a state always correlates with the strength of the national (not ethnic) community's identity. The quality of such correlation becomes crucial and often improves during the trials. Peace has never existed without war, but worldwide development is constant in its changing cycles of colonization (confirmation of Empires/confederations, movement towards bipolarity, strengthening of military-technogenic human potential, globalization of economics and identity) and decolonization (territorial reconstruction of the world, development accent's shift towards the social equity, branding "comfort places", peripherality of capitalism). Each sociopolitical developments (war and a coup d'état, terrorism and AIDS, natural disasters and changes in social display) as attractors of such cycles actualize the question about the maturity of relations between a state and society. The form of such relationships could be designed by religion, political regime, social contract and establish systematic game rules. It converts political support for public institutions by masses into increasing of various incomes among the population (economic stability, legal, financial and social population security, distribution of capabilities and software and growth prospects system on the whole, it's symbolic and social equity).The chosen format of relationships between a state and society is the core of the system modernization, key actor's responsibility (government, community, business and media-environment) and the correspondence of their activity with a single strategic model (which system aims at) is a major factor in its successful renewal. ; The maturity of a state always correlates with the strength of the national (not ethnic) community's identity. The quality of such correlation becomes crucial and often improves during the trials. Peace has never existed without war, but worldwide development is constant in its changing cycles of colonization (confirmation of Empires/confederations, movement towards bipolarity, strengthening of military-technogenic human potential, globalization of economics and identity) and decolonization (territorial reconstruction of the world, development accent's shift towards the social equity, branding "comfort places", peripherality of capitalism). Each sociopolitical developments (war and a coup d'état, terrorism and AIDS, natural disasters and changes in social display) as attractors of such cycles actualize the question about the maturity of relations between a state and society. The form of such relationships could be designed by religion, political regime, social contract and establish systematic game rules. It converts political support for public institutions by masses into increasing of various incomes among the population (economic stability, legal, financial and social population security, distribution of capabilities and software and growth prospects system on the whole, it's symbolic and social equity).The chosen format of relationships between a state and society is the core of the system modernization, key actor's responsibility (government, community, business and media-environment) and the correspondence of their activity with a single strategic model (which system aims at) is a major factor in its successful renewal.

The phenomenon of the war through the frame of the political-aesthetical approach is conducted. The aim of the article is to research the moving factors, elements and function of the political aesthetization of the war as a political phenomenon and a complex political process. The methodology of this research is based on the political-aesthetical approach, which introduce the connection and interaction between the aesthetical and political spheres as a collection of the specific political-aesthetical phenomena and processes, emerging from the law of the people psychic working. The idea, that the people psychic works on the aesthetical laws, give us the possibility to view the political aesthetization as a natural process of political consequence. Thus, the main factors of political aesthetization of the war we could define as a irrational nature of political things, a strong emotional influence of the political thinking process by natural and managed sources, a correlation between political values and the aesthetical judgment. The elements of the political aesthetization process are determined as the political symbolization, political metaphorization and political ritualization. As to the war we conduct the symbols of the war, weapon, army and other war's attributes; the rituals of the peace and war; the main metaphors, which descript the war and give some imagination about the war's attributes and senses. We define the key functions of the political aesthetization of the war as the valuation, interpretation, mobilization, behavioral model's forming and the other. ; The phenomenon of the war through the frame of the political-aesthetical approach is conducted. The aim of the article is to research the moving factors, elements and function of the political aesthetization of the war as a political phenomenon and a complex political process. The methodology of this research is based on the political-aesthetical approach, which introduce the connection and interaction between the aesthetical and political spheres as a collection of the specific political-aesthetical phenomena and processes, emerging from the law of the people psychic working. The idea, that the people psychic works on the aesthetical laws, give us the possibility to view the political aesthetization as a natural process of political consequence. Thus, the main factors of political aesthetization of the war we could define as a irrational nature of political things, a strong emotional influence of the political thinking process by natural and managed sources, a correlation between political values and the aesthetical judgment. The elements of the political aesthetization process are determined as the political symbolization, political metaphorization and political ritualization. As to the war we conduct the symbols of the war, weapon, army and other war's attributes; the rituals of the peace and war; the main metaphors, which descript the war and give some imagination about the war's attributes and senses. We define the key functions of the political aesthetization of the war as the valuation, interpretation, mobilization, behavioral model's forming and the other.

Basic mechanisms of forming and functioning of civil movements in the modern world are considered. Different interpretations of the concept of civil movements are given. E. Giddens has identifid four areas in which social movements operate in modern societies: 1) democratic movements that work for political rights; 2) labor movements that work for control of the workplace; 3)ecological movements that are concerned with the environment: 4) peace movements that work against military conflcts. Author gives her own classifiation separating economic, religious, social, political, ecological movements. It is underlined, that civil movements may destroy political system. The possibilities of political mobilization are considered. Mass media and Internet are proved to have a large inflence on political movements. A special attention is paid to civil movements in Ukraine ; Раскрыты основные механизмы формирования и функционирования общественных движений в современном мире. Приведены различные интерпретации понятия общественных движений. Предложена авторская классификация общественных движений. Подчеркнуто, что общественные движения могут оказывать деструктивное влияние на политическую систему. Рассмотрены возможности мобилизации участников общественных движений с помощью СМИ и Интернета. Отдельное внимание уделено общественным движениям в Украине ; Розкрито основні механізми формування та функціонування громадських рухів у сучасному світі. Подано різні інтерпретації концепту громадських рухів.Запропоновано авторську класифікацію громадських рухів. Показано, що громадські рухи можуть мати деструктивний вплив на політичну систему. Розглянуто можливості мобілізації учасників громадських рухів за допомогою ЗМІ та Інтернету. Окрему увагу приділено громадським рухам на вітчизняних теренах

The article is devoted to understanding the social and political activity of Ukrainian civil society, what is aimed at overcoming the conflict in the east of the country. The experience of using "road mapping" is analyses as a sort of social technologies. It is constructing "road map" that includes: assessment of the system, also internal and external factors; mission, aims and tasks of social technological intervention; tools and techniques; stages of social transformation; drivers of change and evaluation of the "output system". Attention is accented to need for dialogue between the conflicting sides, highlights the role of "third side" and facilitators. ; Статья посвящена осмыслению социально-политической активности украинского гражданского общества, направленной на преодоление конфликта на Востоке страны. Анализируется опыт использования «дорожного картирования» как разновидности социальных технологий. Выстраивается структура «дорожной карты», которая содержит: оценку состояния системы, в том числе внутренние и внешние факторы; миссию, цели и задачи социотехнологического вмешательства; применяемые средства и приемы; этапы социальных трансформаций; движущие силы изменений и оценку состояния «системы на выходе». Акцентируется внимание на необходимости диалога между конфликтующими сторонами, подчеркивается роль «третьей стороны» и фасилитаторов. ; Стаття присвячена осмисленню соціально-політичної активності українського громадянського суспільства, спрямованої на подолання конфлікту на Сході країни. Аналізується досвід використання «дорожнього картування» як різновіду соціальних технологій. Вибудовується структура «дорожньої карти», яка містить: оцінку стану системи, у тому числі внутрішні і зовнішні фактори; місію, цілі і завдання соціотехнологічнного втручання; засоби та прийоми, яки для цього застосовуються; етапи соціальних трансформацій; рушійні сили змін та оцінку стану «системи на виході». Акцентується увага на необхідності діалогу між конфліктуючими сторонами, підкреслюється роль «третьої сторони» та фасілітаторів.

У статті розглядається глобалізація та її вплив на державне управління з точки зору синергетики. Автор аналізує феномен зменшення ролі національних держав під впливом глобалізаційних процесів на основі методології синергетики, теорії управління в умовах невизначеності та багатовекторності. Практика глобалізації останніх років показує, що методи синергетики використовуються конструкторами нового глобального світу для дезорганізації тих соціальних систем, які не відповідають їхнім вимогам. Одним з методологічних аспектів обгрунтування цього процесу є залучення ідей теорії хаосу для обґрунтування постмодерністської філософії. Можна констатувати, що глобалізація, вписуючись у синергетичну парадигму, з одного боку, прагне підсилити тенденцію до стійкості державного управління, оскільки збільшує число загальних цивілізаційних факторів, що піддаються керуванню і контролю. Але, з іншого боку, вона ж призводить до зростання нестійкості державного управління, оскільки ускладнює взаємодію держави з іншими політичними акторами, в першу чергу з бізнесом, робить їх усе більше динамічними і нелінійними. ; The article deals with globalization and its impact on governance in terms of synergy. The author analyzes the phenomenon of reduction of the role of national states under the influence of globalization processes on the basis of synergetic methodology, management theory under uncertainty and multidirectional. Practice globalization of recent years shows that the methods used by the designers of the new synergy of global peace for disruption of social systems that do not meet their requirements. One of the methodological aspects of the justification of this process is to involve the ideas of chaos theory to justify postmodern philosophy. We can conclude that globalization paradigm synergistic blend of, on the one hand, seeks to strengthen the trend towards sustainability of the government as civilization increases the number of common factors amenable to management and control. But on the other hand, it also increases the ...

Ukraine and Belarus have great potential for development of bilateral cooperation as a neighboring state holds a clear position on the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of Ukraine. Belarus has always been on the side of peace in Ukraine and is willing to constantly continue to promote peaceful relations and fruitful cooperation, which is actively developing during the last decades. The governments of the two countries stressed the importance of developing cooperation, based both on common projects and equally important common issues. Do not forget that the development of international cooperation in all spheres of our young country is one of the priorities of its activity. ; Украина и Республика Беларусь имеют большой потенциал развития двустороннего сотрудничества, поскольку соседнее государство держит четкую позицию относительно суверенитета, территориальной целостности и независимости Украины. Беларусь всегда была на стороне мира в Украине и готова постоянно и в дальнейшем способствовать проведению мирных отношений и плодотворного сотрудничества, активно развивается на протяжении последних десятилетий. Правительства наших государств подчеркивают важность развития сотрудничества, которое базируется как на совместных проектах так и не менее важных совместных проблемах. Не стоит забывать, что развитие международного сотрудничества во всех сферах нашего молодого государства является одним из приоритетных направлений ее деятельности. ; Україна та Республіка Білорусь мають великий потенціал розвитку двосторонньої співпраці, оскільки сусідня держава тримаєчітку позицію щодо суверенітету, територіальної цілісності та незалежності України. Білорусь завжди була на стороні миру в Україні і готова постійно й надалі сприяти проведенню мирних відносин та плідної співпраці, що активно розвивається впродовж останніх десятиліть. Уряди наших держав наголошують на важливості розвитку співробітництва, яке базується як на спільних проектах так і не менш важливих спільних проблемах. Не варто забувати, що розвиток міжнародного співробітництва у всіх сферах нашої молодої держави є одним із пріоритетних напрямів її діяльності.

According to the international peace research projects analysis' provided by The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), The Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), The Heritage Foundation, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP), based on the financial security rate, professional level of researches, ability to involve professional stuff, abilities to influence the authority, as well as, to create the link between the science and state policy, there was made a try to illustrate the USA «think tanks» international imaging picture and to point out those, which are the most powerful and effective in terms of foreign policy research, as well as, international relations and security. Some of the reasons to choose these very «tanks» are explained too.The «think tank» industry in the USA is getting popular, in contrast to the high technological or energy sector which balance depends on the demand and supply law, it is hard to talk about the pluses and minuses of the «think tank» work. The main feature of these «tanks» is the great number of the influence methods. That is why, the every single estimation of which has to have the complex of features that gives a chance to show the role and the level of effectiveness. The key point of the research is to find the main US analytic centers that are in power to influence the foreign-policy decision.In 2013 there were 29,1 % of the world's «think tanks» total number in the North America, which means 2000 out of 6800, 1777 were located in the USA.The main research vectors of such centers remained the foreign and domestic policy of their countries, as well as, international relations. The USA has higher level of the research projects differentiation that includes almost all the aspects of the international community life.The «think tanks» rising level in the USA is followed by the competition rising level that leads to the scientific researches and recommendations effectiveness rate rise from the one side, and creates the statements, conclusions and recommendations repetition effect, from the other side.Some of the independent researches, who study the problematical aspects of the «think tanks» activity, are into the recommendations creation that will help to increase their effectiveness. Some of them are the following:1. To create working group of the main «think tanks» representatives, in order to create the number of alternative strategies and recommendations for the organizations' financing improvement.2. To offer the donors to implement more strategical and long lasting approaches to the scientific institutions' financing.3. A special donor meeting has to create a forum where the «think tanks», politicians, mass media and donors in terms of a dialogue on the financing or any other things could find a common language. Donors and «think tanks» need to organize some researching ways of the accelerated synergy, consolidation and cooperation plans, as well as, the USA independent institutions actions that conduct the great analytic and expert activities.4. To create a consolidated network of the thought-out financial standards in order to isolate «think tanks» from the private and state donors that can influence the estimation, analysis and conclusion.5. To show the «think tanks» effectiveness examples to the politicians, stuff, community organizations, citizens.6. «Think tanks» themselves should investigate the effectiveness of the mass media and the Internet use, in order to create some particular recommendations that improve this sphere.7. To implement special technologies and strategies to estimate the ratio scientific activities and the means needed for this.8. To reach the minimal number of the serving centers, some researchers and projects conducted by them. ; На основании результатов анализа исследовательских проектов Пенсильванского университета, Института исследований внешней политики, Центра стратегических и международных исследований, Фонда «Наследие», Американского института предпринимательства, Фонда Карнеги за международный мир и других, где руководствуясь оценкой финансовой обеспеченности, профессиональности уровня исследований, состоятельности привлечь квалифицированных ученых, возможности влиять на власть и способности наладить эффективную связь между наукой и государством, представлена общая картина рейтингования (имиджирования) независимых «мозговых центров» США. ; За результатами аналізу дослідницьких проектів Пенсільванського університету, Інституту досліджень зовнішньої політики, Центру стратегічних і міжнародних досліджень, Фонду «Спадщина», Американського інституту підприємництва, Фонду Карнегі за міжнародний мир тощо, в яких представлено оцінки фінансової забезпеченості, фахового рівня досліджень, спроможності залучати кваліфікованих учених, можливостей впливати на владу та здатності налагодити ефективний зв'язок між наукою і державною політикою, подано загальну картину рейтингування (іміджування) незалежних «мозкових центрів» США.