Suchergebnisse

This article deals with the visit of the Belgian Queen Elisabeth to Poland in 1955. The monarch was to be the honorary guest of the Fifth International Chopin Competition. The queen used the opportunity to carry out a diplomatic mission, attempting to resolve issues that negotiations between Brussels and Warsaw failed to disentangle. This article analyses the mission and its political consequences for mutual relations between the two countries. ; Artykuł poświęcony jest wizycie Elżbiety królowej Belgóww Polsce w 1955 r. Monarchini miała być honorowym gościem V Międzynarodowego Konkursu Chopinowskiego. Królowa podjęła się przy tej okazji misji dyplomatycznej, której efektem miało być rozwikłanie problemów, których nie udało się rozwiązać na drodze negocjacji między Brukselą a Warszawą. Artykuł niniejszy poświęcony jest analizie tej misji oraz jej skutkom politycznym dla wzajemnych stosunków między obydwoma krajami.

This article deals with the visit of the Belgian Queen Elisabeth to Poland in 1955. The monarch was to be the honorary guest of the Fifth International Chopin Competition. The queen used the opportunity to carry out a diplomatic mission, attempting to resolve issues that negotiations between Brussels and Warsaw failed to disentangle. This article analyses the mission and its political consequences for mutual relations between the two countries. ; Artykuł poświęcony jest wizycie Elżbiety królowej Belgóww Polsce w 1955 r. Monarchini miała być honorowym gościem V Międzynarodowego Konkursu Chopinowskiego. Królowa podjęła się przy tej okazji misji dyplomatycznej, której efektem miało być rozwikłanie problemów, których nie udało się rozwiązać na drodze negocjacji między Brukselą a Warszawą. Artykuł niniejszy poświęcony jest analizie tej misji oraz jej skutkom politycznym dla wzajemnych stosunków między obydwoma krajami.

Mode of access: Internet. ; Superseded by its Studies in economics and commerce.

Vols. 1-21 edited by H. B. Adams. ; Some volumes issued in reprint editions. ; Vol. 23 called ser. 20, extra number. ; Vol. 22 issued without series numbering and title. ; Vol. 5 never published. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Published under the direction of the Dept. of History and Political Science of the University of North Carolina. ; For earlier file, see entry in Old Catalog: North Carolina. University. History Dept. The James Sprunt studies in history and political science. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Some vols. issued in revised eds. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; MAIN; JA37.Y3: Includes reprints when originals not available ; MAIN; JA37.Y3: Vol. 1-8 are cataloged separately

Vol. 5 issued without series title. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Issued by the President White School, Cornell University. ; 14

At head of title: The University of North Carolina. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Vol. 1-17 published under the direction of the North Carolina Historical Society; vol. 18-22 under the direction of the Department of History and Government of the University of North Carolina; vol. 23- under the direction of the Departments of History and Political Science of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Today we are often skeptical of the role played by representations of the nation state in constructing and legitimating ways of life and public policies. We portray what once appeared to be neutral, scientific representations of our practices and our heritages as contingent historical objects. How did we become so skeptical? The answer has several parts: developmental historicism dominated the human sciences in the latter half of the nineteenth century; the turn of the century witnessed an epistemic rupture and the rise of a modernist empiricism that came to dominate the social sciences; modernist empiricists reformulated their approach during the latter half of the twentieth century in response to alternative visions of social science; and, finally, the close of the twentieth century also saw the rise of a radical historicism that spread from philosophy and literature to history and even social science. In short, we have become skeptical as we have moved towards a radical historicism that challenges scientism and decenters the grand narratives of yore.

At head of title, 1919-34: Dept. of International Studies of the London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London) ; Mode of access: Internet.

One of the major fallacies of Western civilization, according to Alfred North Whitehead,' was the propensity of Western thinkers to assume that ideas generated within their intellectual landscape were indicative of reality itself. Although some phases of Western science, notably physics and philosophy, have transcended their parochial origins, aspects of the old medieval synthesis still remain in the Western worldview. The gradual fragmentation of the old categories of natural history and theology into the isolated sciences and disciplines of today has produced a myriad of separate bodies of knowledge complete with their professional priesthoods and has allowed considerable slippage in the ability of the Western scientific paradigm to generate adequate explanations for the multitude of problems we face as a society.

Under what conditions does science influence environmental policy? International Relations (IR) scholars, such as Peter M Haas, have argued that to gain political influence, science should not connect to policy before scientific consensus has been reached. We take this suggestion as a point of departure for investigating how science is and should be connected to policy in international environmental governance. Using insights from the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS), the contribution of IR is critically discussed, both to present its limitations and, primarily, to further develop the understanding of scientific consensus within IR and the need for separation and connections between science and policy. The organization and performance of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), including the various assessments made by scholars from IR and STS, is used as an illustrative case. From the discussion of IR and STS and the role of the IPCC in climate policy, we conclude that the focus within STS on contextual and informal factors could shed light on how science and technology are understood by IR scholars, who focus more on the formal organizational design of the interplay between science and policy.

In this project report for the Global Studies Initiative at Parkland College, the instructor of Political Sciences 202, Introduction to International Relations, describes how the instructor adjusted a course already focused on international and multicultural issues to include increased student interaction with one another by incorporating class presentations into the curriculum.

Editors: 1882/83-Aug./Sept. 1901, H. B. Adams.--Oct. 1901-Nov./Dec. 1907, J. M. Vincent (with J. H. Hollander and W. W. Willoughby, 1902-07) ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Vols. for 1908- issued under the direction of the Departments of History, Political Economy and Political Science of the university.

Editors: 1882/83-Aug./Sept. 1901, H. B. Adams.--Oct. 1901-Nov./Dec. 1907, J. M. Vincent (with J. H. Hollander and W. W. Willoughby, 1902-07) ; Some volumes issued in reprint editions. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Vols. for 1908- issued under the direction of the Departments of History, Political Economy and Political Science of the university. ; Vols. 1-26, 1882/83-19 . ; One of two records for this title. See other record for holdings in other libraries.