Vols. 1-21 edited by H. B. Adams. ; Some volumes issued in reprint editions. ; Vol. 23 called ser. 20, extra number. ; Vol. 22 issued without series numbering and title. ; Vol. 5 never published. ; Mode of access: Internet.
What effect has the study of gender had on political science? Compared to other branches of the social sciences, political science has been among the most resistant to feminist analysis. Political science scholarship generally is divided into four main subfields: political theory, American politics, comparative politics, & international relations. There are great disparities between these areas in the types & amount of gender scholarship that has been done. While feminist theory has become an accepted part of political theory, it has had a more limited impact in the other areas. Furthermore, where gender scholarship has appeared, it is often guided by intellections. Focusing on current major themes & significant works in the discipline, this article explores the differences in gender scholarship between subfields. 29 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 38, Heft 5, S. 690-700
Many readers look to comics and cartoons for entertainment, but they can also inform, as well as inspire, controversy and even acts of political violence, as the Jyllands-Posten and Charlie Hebdo cases demonstrate. Indeed, politics and comics connect and overlap in all sorts of ways. This review essay explores the nexus of politics and comics at a time when a growing number of cartoonists are creating extended works of graphic nonfiction that address serious political and historical themes.
A general cycle of relations between the Department of Defense (DoD) and the university is described with particular reference to the social sciences and international studies: a general decline in amity since World War II, decreased support for DoD objectives, a concern for the effect of DoD priorities on the general research profile, the growth of in-house and nonacademic vendors in research and training, and the enclaving of the military-connected research community within the university. The pattern of DoD support for strategic studies, linguistics, and language and area studies is examined.