Professional Relationships and Crises in Japan
In: Futures: the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 230
ISSN: 0016-3287
In: Futures: the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 230
ISSN: 0016-3287
In: Futures, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 230-241
Sexual abuse of patients has received much press in recent years. More victims have come forward documenting their experiences with professionals who abuse fiduciary and confidential relationships by engaging the victim in sexual liaisons. The work is written by a lawyer and a psychologist to examine the ramifications of these problems, and should be of interest to a wide audience of professional and scholarly readers, particularly those in the helping professions, and to college students especially in Women's Studies Courses with a focus on women and violence themes.||For generations, untold
In: Berne Asylum Adjudication Workshop, 2014
SSRN
Working paper
In: 57 Wake Forest Law Review (2023, Forthcoming)
SSRN
In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Band 6, Heft 3
Die Durchführung qualitativer Forschung auf der Basis einer feministischen Forschungs-Methodologie erfordert ein hohes Maß ethischer Bindung von Forschenden – insbesondere hinsichtlich des notwendigen Zeitaufwands zum Aufbau und zur Aufrechterhaltung sozialer Netzwerke zwischen Forschenden und Beforschten. Der Beitrag wirft Fragen auf, ob es bei einer großen qualitativen Studie für Forschende möglich ist, diese Ideale auf jede/n Teilnehmende/n anzuwenden.
This role-play focuses on a whistle-blowing scenario involving data management issues in a research lab, complicated by uncomfortable personal relationships. Whistle-blowing involves raising concerns or allegations of wrongdoing or misconduct. There is an obligation for whistle-blowers to do so in good faith, which means based on reasonable belief or facts. Suspecting that someone has engaged in research misconduct is one of the most difficult situations researchers face. This is especially true when relationships are strained for other reasons. If you have the suspicion of research misconduct, the possible consequences for all involved can be serious. To handle the situation responsibly and in the best possible manner for your career and the other people involved, you should move deliberately and carefully. Universities are required by the federal government to have procedures for protecting whistle-blowers against retaliation and for reporting misconduct. Inform yourself not only of the formal rules (see your university's policies) but you should also inform yourself of the informal rules for having a dispute in a professional manner while protecting yourself and your career. See the paper on how to report research misconduct and still have a successful career afterwards (Gunsalus, 1998). Also, any paper discovered to have incorrect information should be retracted and errata should be issued for the benefit of other researchers.
BASE
In: Government information quarterly: an international journal of policies, resources, services and practices, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 149-168
ISSN: 0740-624X
In: Public management: an international journal of research and theory, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 489-509
ISSN: 1470-1065
In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Band 6, Heft 3
Ausgehend von einer laufenden Untersuchung zur Entwicklung von Selbstregulation in der frühen Kindheit (BOYER 2005a, 2005b; BOYER, BLODGETT & TURK 2004) beschäftigt sich dieser Beitrag mit ethischen und professionellen Überlegungen zum Sampling in einer groß angelegten qualitativen Studie. An der Untersuchung nahmen 146 Familien mit Kindern im Vorschulalter und 15 Erzieher und Erzieherinnen aus sieben Vorschulen teil. Das Datenmaterial setzte sich zusammen aus 30- bis 45-minütigen Tonbandaufnahmen von Einzelinterviews und aus (insgesamt 28) 90- bis 120-minütigen fokussierten Gruppendiskussionen sowie aus 30-minütigen Videoaufnahmen, die jedes Kind beim natürlichen Spiel zeigen. Über die Herausforderungen in Bezug auf informiertes Einverständnis und längerfristige Teilnahme bei großen Untersuchungen berichtet die Literatur (GALL, GALL & BORG, 2005). Teilnehmer und Teilnehmerinnen qualitativer Studien werden gezielt ausgewählt, um möglichst Informatives zum Thema beizusteuern (CRESWELL, 2002). Dies stellt eine Herausforderung für die qualitative Sozialforschung dar, die um maximale Teilnahme und große Stichproben bemüht ist, weil freiwillige Teilnehmende "in der Regel besser gebildet sind, einen höheren sozioökonomischen Status haben, intelligenter sind, bedürftiger nach sozialer Anerkennung, geselliger, unkonventioneller, unautoritärer und weniger konform als Nichtfreiwillige" (MCMILLAN, 2004, S.116). Dieser Beitrag zeigt eine Umgehensweise mit diesen Sampling-Schwierigkeiten und plädiert für den Aufbau von Beziehungen zum Forschungsfeld auf ethischen, interpersonalen und professionellen Grundlagen.
In: Social Sciences ; Volume 8 ; Issue 9
This article explores trust in children&rsquo ; s relationships with professionals in the context of safeguarding concerns. With exception, existing research with children about trust in professionals often fails to unpick trust. Using sociological conceptualisations of trust, most often considered in relation to adults, this article unravels this complex concept. It arrives at a conception of trust as socially situated, an attribute of relationships, and a combination of interpretation (knowledge and experience) and faith. This conceptualization of trust is examined in the context of interview accounts from children that were aged 8&ndash ; 10 in an English primary school. Interviews invited their perspectives on three fictional vignettes about peer conflict, domestic abuse, and child sexual abuse. My analysis, although small-scale, argues that focusing on the process of trust in children&rsquo ; s professional relationships and the social, cultural, political, and relational contexts that shape this process, is a lucrative way to gain enhanced understandings of how trust is generated and what facilitates and undermines trust. It sheds light on children&rsquo ; s interpretations of existing relationships and imagined interactions with professionals, revealing the knowledge that they hold and what they do not yet, or cannot know, and how this knowledge (or lack of) influences their trust. This analysis is socially situated attending to children&rsquo ; s biographies, which offers insights that provide good grounds for improving children&rsquo ; s relationships with professionals.
BASE