States are the main actors of international law and key actors in international affairs. States define the main vectors of the international law development and have an influence (direct and indirect) on all trends in international life. Currently there is no universal, generally accepted definition of state іn positive international law. The purpose of the article is to analyze the approaches to the definition of the state as a subject of international public law and to outline the definition of the state in accordance with applicable international law and international legal practice. The article analyzes the main characteristics of the state and the criteria (elements) of the state as a subject of public international law in accordance with applicable international law, international legal practice and modern international legal doctrine. It is concluded that the state is a subject of public international law, which is a political and legal territorial entity that meets the following criteria: has a permanent population, a defined territory, government, capacity to enter into international relations. Given the presence of these four criteria (elements) of the state, the state's sovereignty is presumed. It is also concluded that а state as a subject of public international law has the ability to create norms of international law; to acquire rights and obligations under such norms, to implement the specified norms; has the ability to participate in international public-legal relations; has the ability to bear international legal responsibility. The subject of international law is the state as a whole, and not its separate administrative-territorial units, state bodies or officials.
As you know, in public international law there is no hierarchy of sources of law. However, in practice, there are controversial situations when legal relations are subject to legal regulation of various sources of law. This is especially acute in the case of international custom and an international treaty.The purpose of the scientific article is to study the problems of the relationship and interaction of the international treaty and international custom in various aspects of their existence, namely: in aspects of their occurrence, observance and application.The article focuses on the legal analysis of the relationship between the international treaty and international custom in the judicial practice of the International Court of Justice of the United Nations. The analysis is subject, in particular, to the case of the continental shelf of the North Sea (1969), as well as the case of military and paramilitary activities in Nicaragua and against Nicaragua (1986).Based on the analyzed materials, the author of the article came to the conclusion that, firstly, an international treaty may contain customary norms, that have already existed and were in effect even before its conclusion. Secondly, the international treaty may be the last stage in the process of forming the customary norm. And thirdly, an international treaty may propose new legal norms that, due to further practice of subjects of international law, can be the basis for the creation of a new international custom.Moreover, it can be concluded that international customs and international treaties can exist and operate in parallel. However, even if the contractual and customary norm are identical in content, and the subjects of international law who are in disputed legal relations are connected, both by one and the second source of law, then from the point of view of applying these identical norms, they exist independently from each other. ; Як відомо, у міжнародному публічному праві відсутня ієрархія джерел права. Однак в практиці виникають спірні ...
Держави є основними суб'єктами міжнародного права і ключовими акторами міжнародних взаємодій, визначають основні вектори розвитку міжнародного права та здійснюють вплив (прямий та опосередкований) на всі тенденції міжнародного життя. Сьогодні у позитивному міжнародному праві відсутнє універсальне загальноприйняте визначення поняття держави. Метою статті є аналіз підходів до визначення поняття держави як суб'єкта міжнародного публічного права, а також окреслення визначення поняття держави відповідно до чинного міжнародного права та міжнародно-правової практики.У статті аналізуються основні характеристики держави і критерії (елементи) держави як суб'єкта міжнародного публічного права відповідно до чинного міжнародного права, міжнародно-правової практики та сучасних доктринальних вчень.Зроблено висновки, що держава – це суб'єкт міжнародного публічного права, що становить собою політико-правове територіальне утворення, яке відповідає наступним критеріям: має постійне населення, визначену територію, публічні органи державної влади, здатність самостійно вступати у міжнародні публічно-правові відносини. За умови присутності вказаних чотирьох критеріїв (елементів) держави наявність суверенітету держави презюмується.Зроблено також висновки, що держава як суб'єкт міжнародного публічного права має здатність створювати норми міжнародного права; набувати прав та обов'язків за такими нормами, реалізувати вказані норми; може брати участь у міжнародних публічно-правових відносинах; має здатність нести міжнародно-правову відповідальність. Суб'єктом міжнародного права виступає держава в цілому, а не її окремі адміністративно-територіальні одиниці, державні органи чи посадові особи. ; Государства являются основными субъектами международного права и ключевыми актерами международных взаимодействий, которые определяют основные векторы развития международного права и оказывают влияние (прямое и опосредованное) на все тенденции международной жизни. В положительном международном праве до сих пор отсутствует универсальное общепринятое определение понятия государства. Целью статьи является анализ подходов к определению понятия государства как субъекта международного публичного права, а также определение понятия государства в соответствии с действующим международным правом и международно-правовой практикой.В статье анализируются основные характеристики государства и критерии (элементы) государства как субъекта международного публичного права в соответствии с действующим международным правом, международно-правовой практикой и современными доктринальными учениями.Сделаны выводы, что государство – это субъект международного публичного права, представляющий собой политико-правовое территориальное образование, которое соответствует следующим критериям: имеет постоянное население, определенную территорию, публичные органы государственной власти, способность самостоятельно вступать в международные публично-правовые отношения. При условии присутствия указанных четырех критериев (элементов) государства наличие суверенитета государства презюмируется.Сделано также выводы, что государство как субъект международного публичного права имеет способность создавать нормы международного права; приобретать права и обязанности за такими нормами , реализовывать указанные нормы; может принимать участие в международных публично-правовых отношениях; имеет способность нести международно-правовую ответственность. Субъектом международного права выступает государство в целом, а не его отдельные административно-территориальные единицы, государственные органы или должностные лица. ; States are the main actors of international law and key actors in international affairs. States define the main vectors of the international law development and have an influence (direct and indirect) on all trends in international life. Currently there is no universal, generally accepted definition of state іn positive international law. The purpose of the article is to analyze the approaches to the definition of the state as a subject of international public law and to outline the definition of the state in accordance with applicable international law and international legal practice.The article analyzes the main characteristics of the state and the criteria (elements) of the state as a subject of public international law in accordance with applicable international law, international legal practice and modern international legal doctrine.It is concluded that the state is a subject of public international law, which is a political and legal territorial entity that meets the following criteria: has a permanent population, a defined territory, government, capacity to enter into international relations. Given the presence of these four criteria (elements) of the state, the state's sovereignty is presumed.It is also concluded that а state as a subject of public international law has the ability to create norms of international law; to acquire rights and obligations under such norms, to implement the specified norms; has the ability to participate in international public-legal relations; has the ability to bear international legal responsibility. The subject of international law is the state as a whole, and not its separate administrative-territorial units, state bodies or officials.
Держави є основними суб'єктами міжнародного права і ключовими акторами міжнародних взаємодій, визначають основні вектори розвитку міжнародного права та здійснюють вплив (прямий та опосередкований) на всі тенденції міжнародного життя. Сьогодні у позитивному міжнародному праві відсутнє універсальне загальноприйняте визначення поняття держави. Метою статті є аналіз підходів до визначення поняття держави як суб'єкта міжнародного публічного права, а також окреслення визначення поняття держави відповідно до чинного міжнародного права та міжнародно-правової практики.У статті аналізуються основні характеристики держави і критерії (елементи) держави як суб'єкта міжнародного публічного права відповідно до чинного міжнародного права, міжнародно-правової практики та сучасних доктринальних вчень.Зроблено висновки, що держава – це суб'єкт міжнародного публічного права, що становить собою політико-правове територіальне утворення, яке відповідає наступним критеріям: має постійне населення, визначену територію, публічні органи державної влади, здатність самостійно вступати у міжнародні публічно-правові відносини. За умови присутності вказаних чотирьох критеріїв (елементів) держави наявність суверенітету держави презюмується.Зроблено також висновки, що держава як суб'єкт міжнародного публічного права має здатність створювати норми міжнародного права; набувати прав та обов'язків за такими нормами, реалізувати вказані норми; може брати участь у міжнародних публічно-правових відносинах; має здатність нести міжнародно-правову відповідальність. Суб'єктом міжнародного права виступає держава в цілому, а не її окремі адміністративно-територіальні одиниці, державні органи чи посадові особи. ; Государства являются основными субъектами международного права и ключевыми актерами международных взаимодействий, которые определяют основные векторы развития международного права и оказывают влияние (прямое и опосредованное) на все тенденции международной жизни. В положительном международном праве до сих пор отсутствует универсальное общепринятое определение понятия государства. Целью статьи является анализ подходов к определению понятия государства как субъекта международного публичного права, а также определение понятия государства в соответствии с действующим международным правом и международно-правовой практикой.В статье анализируются основные характеристики государства и критерии (элементы) государства как субъекта международного публичного права в соответствии с действующим международным правом, международно-правовой практикой и современными доктринальными учениями.Сделаны выводы, что государство – это субъект международного публичного права, представляющий собой политико-правовое территориальное образование, которое соответствует следующим критериям: имеет постоянное население, определенную территорию, публичные органы государственной власти, способность самостоятельно вступать в международные публично-правовые отношения. При условии присутствия указанных четырех критериев (элементов) государства наличие суверенитета государства презюмируется.Сделано также выводы, что государство как субъект международного публичного права имеет способность создавать нормы международного права; приобретать права и обязанности за такими нормами , реализовывать указанные нормы; может принимать участие в международных публично-правовых отношениях; имеет способность нести международно-правовую ответственность. Субъектом международного права выступает государство в целом, а не его отдельные административно-территориальные единицы, государственные органы или должностные лица. ; States are the main actors of international law and key actors in international affairs. States define the main vectors of the international law development and have an influence (direct and indirect) on all trends in international life. Currently there is no universal, generally accepted definition of state іn positive international law. The purpose of the article is to analyze the approaches to the definition of the state as a subject of international public law and to outline the definition of the state in accordance with applicable international law and international legal practice.The article analyzes the main characteristics of the state and the criteria (elements) of the state as a subject of public international law in accordance with applicable international law, international legal practice and modern international legal doctrine.It is concluded that the state is a subject of public international law, which is a political and legal territorial entity that meets the following criteria: has a permanent population, a defined territory, government, capacity to enter into international relations. Given the presence of these four criteria (elements) of the state, the state's sovereignty is presumed.It is also concluded that а state as a subject of public international law has the ability to create norms of international law; to acquire rights and obligations under such norms, to implement the specified norms; has the ability to participate in international public-legal relations; has the ability to bear international legal responsibility. The subject of international law is the state as a whole, and not its separate administrative-territorial units, state bodies or officials.
States are the main actors of international law and key actors in international affairs. States define the main vectors of the international law development and have an influence (direct and indirect) on all trends in international life. Currently there is no universal, generally accepted definition of state іn positive international law. The purpose of the article is to analyze the approaches to the definition of the state as a subject of international public law and to outline the definition of the state in accordance with applicable international law and international legal practice.The article analyzes the main characteristics of the state and the criteria (elements) of the state as a subject of public international law in accordance with applicable international law, international legal practice and modern international legal doctrine.It is concluded that the state is a subject of public international law, which is a political and legal territorial entity that meets the following criteria: has a permanent population, a defined territory, government, capacity to enter into international relations. Given the presence of these four criteria (elements) of the state, the state's sovereignty is presumed.It is also concluded that а state as a subject of public international law has the ability to create norms of international law; to acquire rights and obligations under such norms, to implement the specified norms; has the ability to participate in international public-legal relations; has the ability to bear international legal responsibility. The subject of international law is the state as a whole, and not its separate administrative-territorial units, state bodies or officials. ; Государства являются основными субъектами международного права и ключевыми актерами международных взаимодействий, которые определяют основные векторы развития международного права и оказывают влияние (прямое и опосредованное) на все тенденции международной жизни. В положительном международном праве до сих пор отсутствует универсальное общепринятое определение понятия государства. Целью статьи является анализ подходов к определению понятия государства как субъекта международного публичного права, а также определение понятия государства в соответствии с действующим международным правом и международно-правовой практикой.В статье анализируются основные характеристики государства и критерии (элементы) государства как субъекта международного публичного права в соответствии с действующим международным правом, международно-правовой практикой и современными доктринальными учениями.Сделаны выводы, что государство – это субъект международного публичного права, представляющий собой политико-правовое территориальное образование, которое соответствует следующим критериям: имеет постоянное население, определенную территорию, публичные органы государственной власти, способность самостоятельно вступать в международные публично-правовые отношения. При условии присутствия указанных четырех критериев (элементов) государства наличие суверенитета государства презюмируется.Сделано также выводы, что государство как субъект международного публичного права имеет способность создавать нормы международного права; приобретать права и обязанности за такими нормами , реализовывать указанные нормы; может принимать участие в международных публично-правовых отношениях; имеет способность нести международно-правовую ответственность. Субъектом международного права выступает государство в целом, а не его отдельные административно-территориальные единицы, государственные органы или должностные лица. ; Держави є основними суб'єктами міжнародного права і ключовими акторами міжнародних взаємодій, визначають основні вектори розвитку міжнародного права та здійснюють вплив (прямий та опосередкований) на всі тенденції міжнародного життя. Сьогодні у позитивному міжнародному праві відсутнє універсальне загальноприйняте визначення поняття держави. Метою статті є аналіз підходів до визначення поняття держави як суб'єкта міжнародного публічного права, а також окреслення визначення поняття держави відповідно до чинного міжнародного права та міжнародно-правової практики.У статті аналізуються основні характеристики держави і критерії (елементи) держави як суб'єкта міжнародного публічного права відповідно до чинного міжнародного права, міжнародно-правової практики та сучасних доктринальних вчень.Зроблено висновки, що держава – це суб'єкт міжнародного публічного права, що становить собою політико-правове територіальне утворення, яке відповідає наступним критеріям: має постійне населення, визначену територію, публічні органи державної влади, здатність самостійно вступати у міжнародні публічно-правові відносини. За умови присутності вказаних чотирьох критеріїв (елементів) держави наявність суверенітету держави презюмується.Зроблено також висновки, що держава як суб'єкт міжнародного публічного права має здатність створювати норми міжнародного права; набувати прав та обов'язків за такими нормами, реалізувати вказані норми; може брати участь у міжнародних публічно-правових відносинах; має здатність нести міжнародно-правову відповідальність. Суб'єктом міжнародного права виступає держава в цілому, а не її окремі адміністративно-територіальні одиниці, державні органи чи посадові особи.
The article deals with the correlation between the European Union law and international law. Constant participation of the European Union and its members in international organizations gave a rise to the need for establishment of interrelation between the sources of international law particularly international agreements and customs and sources of European Union law such as regulating agreements and acts of the EU institutions as well as necessity to identify which norms should be applied in a certain case and which hierarchical connections exist in these sources. This issue was research by numerous Ukrainian and foreign scholars such as T.V. Komarova, O.V. Plotnikov, K. Zigler, I.I. Maryniv, R. Jennigs, K. Tomushat and others. But unlike scientific research EU agreements do not have any provisions which would identify the type of relations between EU law and international law. It is also necessary to note that the only subject which position is important in this sphere is EU Court. In order to answer the mentioned questions decisions of the EU Court which had an impact on the formation of a new law and order on international level such as the one of the European Union (for example decision in case Van Gend en Loos) and decision of the Court which established fundamental positions regarding correlation of EU law and international law (for example in case Kadi v Council and Commission) were researched into. Provisions of EU regulating agreements related to international agreements and their place in the system of norms of the European Union were analyzed. To see the procedure of applying customary law in European law case law of the EU Court was researched. The article provides modern position of the EU Court regarding interaction between European and international law.
The article deals with the issue of the conflicts of laws in international private law. It has been found out that each state has its own legal regulation of the relations which leads to conflicts of material norms of various states and complicates legal regulation of international relationships. The law of the states has many differences in regulation of various relations which provides for application of a connecting factor as one of the ways to solve the problem. It has been proved that international private law has a significant role in regulation of relations with a foreign element. As for international private law which norms are formed independently by each state, compliance with treaty obligations as well as rules and principles of international law by each state is significant to each state. At the same time, codification of international private law is the main way for systematization and legislative implementation of conflict of laws, material and procedural provisions designated for regulation of private relations with foreign element. Qualification of legal definitions which are applied in formulation of the rule of the conflict of laws is a burning issue as well. It has been established that the procedure for qualification in international private law should identify the model of relations and consists of three stages which are: interpretation of the rule; analysis of relations; comparison of the rule and relations. It has been clarified that the situation of a mobile conflict and the issue of acceptance or failure to accept remission and remission to the law of the third state relate to the issue regarding application of the rule of the conflict of laws in international private law. We think that the first priority task is to bring national laws on international private law in compliance with modern conditions of international civil and trade turnover. For the future development it is necessary to introduce a single legislative act which will take into account all these issues and the mechanism ...
This article is devoted to the main problems in the institute of the death penalty. Nowadays, our society concentrates on the humanization of the rule-making framework, and especially on the loyal application of the punishment to the defendants. The State by establishing the death penalty takes away human life and it denies the honor, dignity and social value of human beings as the main goal of the states and social existence. The main idea of this article to analyze the institute of the death penalty, to explore and make statistics of states where it still exists and to determine reasons for its application. Therefore, the author considered the main aspects of the institution of the death penalty and the right to life, their legislative consolidation and concluded that the problem of the death penalty is one of the biggest problems in international law. In today's society, a lot of issues concerning the rightness and legality of the use of the death penalty exist. In this regard, the article focuses on the main regulations in which the prohibition of the death penalty is enshrined, these include the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Protocol No. 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on the Abolition of the Death Penalty and the like. The concept of the death penalty, history and current state of its development in the world are also revealed. Also, the author analyzed the doctrine of scholars on this issue and consented that the death penalty is contrary to the principle right to life, which is the major one in international law. The author noted that many countries refuse to recognize international standards in this sphere and refuse to ratify the Protocols to international treaties abolishing the death penalty. Analyzing the issue of the death penalty, the author outlined numerous problems raised during conducting the study and noted that the international community has the task of solving the problems mentioned ...
The article researches development of trust property institute in continental law states and investigates possible development of national legislation in this sphere. The article also characterizes modern state of trust property in Ukraine and proposed models of its improvement. In all researched continental law states it is possible to trace personal way of development of trust property institute as well as a special mean of trust implementation. Approaches of foreign legislators distinguish and can be seen in implementation of single-level and two-level changes. The first one is ratification of the Hague Trust Convention (Italy) as well as enshrining of its own trust like constructions (France, Germany). Two-level changes are represented by first Ratification of the Hague Trust Convention and then adoption of special acts to regulate legislative collisions in regulation of trust relations (Switzerland). The article has also researched prospects in development of Ukrainian national legislation. Draft laws which are registered in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and consider trust property as one more way to ensure performance of duties along with other ones provided for by p. 1 of Art. 546 of the Civil Code of Ukraine such as forfeit, bailment, guarantee, collateral/pledge, retention, deposit (down payment) have been investigated. Reasons for enlarging legislation on trust relations through ratification of conventions and creation of a wide legal regulation of the researched sphere have been provided.
The article is devoted to the study of the problems of the application of law of unrecognized states in international law. The concept of application of foreign law in general and the legislation of unrecognized states in particular is defined. It is indicated that the relation to foreign law, as an actual circumstance or as a legal category, is determined by the method of foreign law application, which varies depending on the legal family to which a particular state belongs. Two main theories concerning recognition are investigated: declarative and constitutive. The notions of "unrecognized states" and "unrecognized governments" are delimited.The peculiarities of the application of the law of unrecognized states in international law are defined. Key words: application of foreign law, establishment of content of foreign law, qualification of foreign law, unrecognized states, unrecognized governments, international recognition, sovereignty. кандидат філологічних наук, доцент, Мясоєдова С. В., Комлик А. В. Проблеми застосування права невизнаних держав в міжнародному праві/ Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого, Україна, Харків;Стаття присвячена дослідженню проблем застосування права невизнаних держав в міжнародному праві. Визначено поняття застосування іноземного права загалом та невизнаних держав зокрема. Вказано на те, що відношення до іноземного права як до фактичної обставини чи як до правової категорії визначається методом застосування іноземного права, що різниться залежно від того, до якої правової сім'ї належить певна держава. Досліджено дві основні теорії щодо визнання: декларативну і конститутивну. Розмежовано поняття «невизнані держави» та «невизнані уряди». Встановлено особливості застосування права невизнаних держав в міжнародному праві.Ключові слова: застосування іноземного права, встановлення змісту іноземного права, кваліфікація іноземного права, невизнані держави, невизнані уряди, міжнародне визнання, суверенітет.
The paper deals with the analysis of the legal nature of international courts' decisions and their impact on the international financial legal order. The author claims that decisions of international courts, creating no new international legal financial norms, act as an additional source of international financial law, having no autonomy, and in combination with other sources of international law, performs the following functions: 1) regulatory-prescriptive (via opinio juris of existing traditions in interstate practice in the financial sphere transforming them into international customary law); 2) regulatory-affirming (confirming the legal nature of the international agreement between the subjects of international financial legal relations which caused a disputable situation). The judicial practice on financial issues and specificity of functioning of such judicial institutions as the Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the CIS Economic Court, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Justice of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community, etc. are examined. The features of the provisions of international agreements on financial issues regarding the procedure for resolving disputes between the parties of the agreement about its implementation are analyzed. The paper explores particularities of the origin and development of the idea of the creation of an international financial court. Amid modern processes of the rapid growth of the amount of crossborder financial flows in the context of globalization, which is the consequence of the implementation of numerous international financial agreements, the idea of creation of an international financial court, which was first suggested in 1935, due to the complexity of legal nature of interstate financial disputes, is an objective necessity. The following features intrinsic to decisions of international courts (including decisions on financial issues) have been identified: 1) locality (binding only on the ...
The concept and essence of "public procurement" in administrative law UKRAINEAbstract. In the article the nature and characteristics of "public procurement" in the administrative law of Ukraine are analyzed from legal point of view. It is proved that the doctrine of administrative law Ukraine still doesn't have common understanding of the conceptual notions - "public procurement". In addition, legal literature has lots of scientific positions whether to consider public procurement as an institute of administrative law. Lack of scientific investigation makes it relevant not only on doctrinal, but also on the level of practical enforcement.Proposed the concept of "public procurement" to determine as an institution of administrative law that defines the process of implementation of the state order, which is the acquisition of state customers of goods and services at the best market conditions to meet the public interest (public needs). However, given that before the adoption of the Law of Ukraine "On public procurement" on legislative and doctrinal levels used the term "state procurements" and after adoption - "public procurements", the term "state procurements" is synonymous to the term " public procurements" and change the wording associated exclusively with the legislative reforms in 2016.Keywords: state procurements, public procurements, the institution of administrative law, administrative agreements.
An integral part of the international legal functioning of international organizations is their participation in civil and economic relations. Participation of international organizations, both intergovernmental and non-governmental, in international relations of powerless character has a certain specificity and raises a number of theoretical and practical issues. An international organization in such relations is a foreign element, the presence of which qualifies relations as international private relations. The volume and types of private transactions involving international organizations vary. On the one hand, all international organizations in order to ensure their daily activities come into private-law relations with the host country, in particular, about the communication (postal, telephone, cellular, et al.), stationery and other products or equipment, utilities consumption and t. e., on the other - organizations implement their statutory capacity through participation in international private law relations. There are number scientific researches devoted to these issues, in particular of V. Barbin, V. Kanashevsky and E. Shilina. In international relations, private international organizations act as legal entities. Usually these organizations acquire the specified status from the registration of their statutes or the roster of legal entities in the State of the location of their headquarters. Often, in the absence of regulations in the statutes of specialized agencies of the UN concerning their status in private law relations, only their active practice of involving into private transactions suggests that they act as legal entities. Regarding the international organizations the same issues arise concerning participation in private law relations of legal persons, of which the definition legal capacity goes beyond the law of one state. International organizations are the main type of international legal persons. The very concept of "international organization" covers both international intergovernmental and international non-governmental organizations. Both the first and second are the special subjects of law, they can only participate in the legal relationship defined by goals and objectives for which they were created, and the relevant statute. Typical international legal persons are an international intergovernmental organization, their participation in the relations of private character differs established practice. Regulation of the legal status of international intergovernmental organizations comes under the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal character (1975), the Law of Treaties (1986), the Convention on the legal status, privileges and immunities of intergovernmental organizations operating in specific areas of cooperation (1980). In turn, a special international agreement concluded between States Parties of international intergovernmental organization is its charter, which can fix the status of organization as a legal entity. Participation of the intergovernmental organization in international relations of a private nature entails the need for a regulation by complex set of rules. Such a complex may contains rules of public international law, international organizations and certain rules of national law. At the same time, taking into account the specifics, the conclusion of agreements with international intergovernmental organizations is considered prestigious, profitable and responsible act for many persons of private law. The same prestigious are economic relations with international non-governmental organizations, whose participation in international private law relations, in turn, entails significantly fewer complications. ; Рассмотрены основные специфические аспекты участия международных организаций в частноправовых отношениях. Исследованы особенности статуса международного юридического лица. Проанализированы различия в подходах к правовому регулированию отношений частноправового характера с участием межправительственных и неправительственных организаций. Освещены особенности статуса Международного комитета Красного Креста, влияющие на подписание договоров частноправового характера ; Розглянуто основні специфічні аспекти участі міжнародних організацій у приватноправових відносинах. Досліджено особливості статусу міжнародної юридичної особи. Проаналізовано відмінність підходів до правового регулювання приватноправових відносин за участю міжурядових та неурядових організацій. Розкрито особливості міжнародно-правового статусу Міжнародного комітету Червоного Хреста, які впливають на укладення угод приватноправового характеру
An integral part of the international legal functioning of international organizations is their participation in civil and economic relations. Participation of international organizations, both intergovernmental and non-governmental, in international relations of powerless character has a certain specificity and raises a number of theoretical and practical issues. An international organization in such relations is a foreign element, the presence of which qualifies relations as international private relations. The volume and types of private transactions involving international organizations vary. On the one hand, all international organizations in order to ensure their daily activities come into private-law relations with the host country, in particular, about the communication (postal, telephone, cellular, et al.), stationery and other products or equipment, utilities consumption and t. e., on the other - organizations implement their statutory capacity through participation in international private law relations. There are number scientific researches devoted to these issues, in particular of V. Barbin, V. Kanashevsky and E. Shilina. In international relations, private international organizations act as legal entities. Usually these organizations acquire the specified status from the registration of their statutes or the roster of legal entities in the State of the location of their headquarters. Often, in the absence of regulations in the statutes of specialized agencies of the UN concerning their status in private law relations, only their active practice of involving into private transactions suggests that they act as legal entities. Regarding the international organizations the same issues arise concerning participation in private law relations of legal persons, of which the definition legal capacity goes beyond the law of one state. International organizations are the main type of international legal persons. The very concept of "international organization" covers both international intergovernmental and international non-governmental organizations. Both the first and second are the special subjects of law, they can only participate in the legal relationship defined by goals and objectives for which they were created, and the relevant statute. Typical international legal persons are an international intergovernmental organization, their participation in the relations of private character differs established practice. Regulation of the legal status of international intergovernmental organizations comes under the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal character (1975), the Law of Treaties (1986), the Convention on the legal status, privileges and immunities of intergovernmental organizations operating in specific areas of cooperation (1980). In turn, a special international agreement concluded between States Parties of international intergovernmental organization is its charter, which can fix the status of organization as a legal entity. Participation of the intergovernmental organization in international relations of a private nature entails the need for a regulation by complex set of rules. Such a complex may contains rules of public international law, international organizations and certain rules of national law. At the same time, taking into account the specifics, the conclusion of agreements with international intergovernmental organizations is considered prestigious, profitable and responsible act for many persons of private law. The same prestigious are economic relations with international non-governmental organizations, whose participation in international private law relations, in turn, entails significantly fewer complications. ; Рассмотрены основные специфические аспекты участия международных организаций в частноправовых отношениях. Исследованы особенности статуса международного юридического лица. Проанализированы различия в подходах к правовому регулированию отношений частноправового характера с участием межправительственных и неправительственных организаций. Освещены особенности статуса Международного комитета Красного Креста, влияющие на подписание договоров частноправового характера ; Розглянуто основні специфічні аспекти участі міжнародних організацій у приватноправових відносинах. Досліджено особливості статусу міжнародної юридичної особи. Проаналізовано відмінність підходів до правового регулювання приватноправових відносин за участю міжурядових та неурядових організацій. Розкрито особливості міжнародно-правового статусу Міжнародного комітету Червоного Хреста, які впливають на укладення угод приватноправового характеру
