[8], 116, [2] p. ; Dedication signed: Christopher Leuer. ; The first leaf is blank except for signature-mark "A". ; With a final errata leaf. ; Heading to dedication in seven lines. Variant: heading in eight lines. ; Reproduction of the original the Union Theological Seminary (New York, N.Y.). Library.
De bagni et essercitii antichi de greci et de romani. ; Discorso sopra la castramentatione, et disciplina militare de romani / composto per il S. Guglielmo Choul . ; con i bagni, & essercitij antichi de greci, & romani ; et tradotto on lingua toscana per M. Gabriel Symeoni, con portada, paginación y signatura propias. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Fecha entre paréntesis tomada de la portada del t. 2. ; Existe otra emisión con distinta portada y fecha de 1559. ; La h. pleg. es esquema tipográfico con grabados xilográficos. ; Las il. son grabados xilográficos intercalados al texto: escenas de vida de romanos y griegos y monedas. ; Texto con apostillas marginales. ; Portada con orla tipográfica. ; Sign.: a-z4, A-H4 ; a-o4, A-E4, [flor]4.
De bagni et essercitii antichi de greci et de romani. ; Discorso sopra la castramentatione, et disciplina militare de romani / composto per il S. Guglielmo Choul . ; con i bagni, & essercitij antichi de greci, & romani ; et tradotto on lingua toscana per M. Gabriel Symeoni, con portada, paginación y signatura propias. ; CCBE S. XVI, ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Existe otra emisión con distinta portada y fecha de 1558. ; Las il. son grabados xilográficos intercalados al texto: escenas de vida de romanos y griegos y monedas. ; Texto con apostillas marginales. ; Portada con orla tipográfica. ; Sign.: a-z4, A-H4, *4 ; a-o4, A-E4, [flor]4.
Fecha probable de imp. ; Enc. Holandesa ; Incipit: "Los autores que expresamente afirman son: Covarrubias, in IV Decret., 2 p., cap. 3, § 5; Ayala." (fol. 167r) ; Explicit: ". Volumus autem quod exemptio praefata non comprehendat ecclesias neque personas in eis quae ad animarum curam pertinent in quibus Decreta Concilii Tridentini omnino servari debeant. [Urbano VIII, Imperscrutabilis, § 20]" (fol. 168v)
Vehement attack upon the Antiguisart, the Brutum Fulmen, and the works of Pierre de Belloy, 1540-1609. The work lists 70 political errors including heresies of those who prefer the human to the divine state. Catholics and Huguenots alike are investigated. Dedicatory epistle signed D.R.A.R.B.L., i.e. Robert A., dom bénédictin lorrain. Dated, "De Paris, ce premier de Iuin 1588." ; Electronic reproduction; 79, (i.e. 80) p. ; 16 cm. (4to)
[110] p. ; Imprint from STC. ; With an index. ; Cambridge University Library also has a fragment (Sayle 244) in the same types as and corresponding to leaves G2,3,6 and 7 in this edition but in a different setting with "villayne" while this edition has "vyllayne" on leaf G2r line 1--STC. ; Imperfect; lacks leaf D7. ; Signatures: A-G (-G8). ; Reproduction of the original in the Cambridge University Library.
Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.
Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.
Further interpretation concerning the Edict of Pacification of 29 March 1562. This specific interpretation restricted the practice of the protestant religion to the individual's own private home, and not in a public meeting place. "Donne à Paris, le quatorzieme iour de Decembre, l'an de grace mil cinq cens soixante trois." ; Electronic reproduction; [24] p. ; 16 cm. (8vo).
APPROVED ; The work which follows examines the process by which private actors in the digital market are redefining fundamental rights through their contractual terms and practical operation. The argument is allied to works which consider ?digital constitutionalism,? the idea that private actors in the digital market are increasingly displaying constitutional features through their contractual terms and documents. Unlike a majority of work in the area of digital constitutionalism the work does not argue that private actors setting rights based standards represents a positive development. Rather, the work argues that private actors, through their re-definition of public, normative standards are generating a body of rules and practices which have displaced democratically decided rights standards with negative consequences for individual autonomy and the Rule of Law. The work argues that this process has been enabled by three features of EU law and policy. The first is an approach of functional equivalence to laws governing the digital market. In accordance with this approach the digital market has been treated as equivalent to traditional markets and its participants are viewed as requiring no additional or supplementary protections or regulations. Of particular significance in functionally equivalent attitudes to the digital market is the Union?s deference to freedom of contract as part of an ordoliberal attitude to market regulation. While this attitude is now beginning to erode (to some extent) in the context of data protection it remains the dominant regulatory approach of the European Union in the digital market. The second feature, not unrelated to the first, is the Union?s preference for economic rather than socially orientated standards and protections in it policies as well as its secondary laws. As part of this preference, when fundamental rights cross the Rubicon from vertically enforced constitutional protections to horizontally enforceable legislative ones their content is transmuted in a manner which favours their economic over socially oriented aspects. The third feature, is what is referred to within the work as the Union?s brittle constitutionalism ? that is the Union?s hesitant and incomplete articulation of and commitment to rights enforcement. This feature is the result in part of the Union?s ambiguous and at times hostile attitude to the development of fundamental rights policy. The work examines the impact of these trends and the rise of private policy they have generated on the rights to privacy and property under the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Abstract In Colombia, political decisions related to the countryside preserve an unjust social order, maintaining inequities and obstacles to the well-being and life quality of farmers. In this scenario the Territorial Arrangement Planning of the San Nicolas Valley, in the East of the department of Antioquia, has generated a series of rural conflicts that accentuate the vulnerabilities of rural residents, threatening the agricultural tradition in this subregion. Thus, this study inquired about the perceptions of legality in the peasant population of the area. A descriptive-correlational study with non-probabilistic sampling was carried out, including 380 peasants, members of civic-rural associations of the San Nicolas Valley, evaluating in four scales: beliefs, values, knowledge of the law and perceived legality in the context. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS v.22 software. The findings indicated significant relationships between the study variables. Despite the state abandonment of the proletariat to market forces in an area with socioeconomic imbalances, no determining link was found between low income and violation of the law.