Investeringer og handel i overgang mellom plan og marked: norske bedrifters erfaringer i Russland
In: NUPI-rapport nr. 207
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: NUPI-rapport nr. 207
In: Det sikkerhetspolitiske bibliotek 5-2001
I 2005 og 2006 foretok Aage Borchgrevink to reiser i omr°adet. I Den usynlige krigen forteller han historiene til menneskene han møtte. Det er sterke beretninger om krigens grusomheter, og om hvordan mennesker bevarer sin menneskelighet i umenneskelige situasjoner. Deres øyenvitneskildringer forteller ogs°a historien om hvordan president Vladimir Putin samler det russiske imperiet p°a nytt
In: NUPI-rapport nr. 208
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 11, S. 334-359
ISSN: 2387-4562
In Russia, there exist legal norms providing for the protection of indigenous small-numbered peoples' rights. Yet, indigenous small-numbered peoples face multiple challenges when it comes to the implementation of their rights. After a brief presentation of the Russian legislation on the rights of indigenous small-numbered peoples, peculiarities of the Russian legal system and impediments to the legal provisions regulating the status of indigenous small-numbered peoples, this article addresses several issues related to the implementation of indigenous small-numbered peoples' rights in Russia today. One of the core issues is the attribution of individual members of indigenous communities to indigenous small-numbered peoples. Such an attribution is still challenging despite the newly adopted amendments to the 30 April 1999 Federal Law N 82-FL: 'On Guarantees of the Rights of Indigenous Small-Numbered Peoples of the Russian Federation'. Another issue is application of the notion 'foreign agent' to individuals and non-commercial organizations. Still another issue is the State's pressure on independent indigenous organizations. The final challenge is the possible impact of amendments to the Constitution approved by popular vote in July 2020 on the rights of indigenous small-numbered peoples.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 62, Heft 2, S. 177-198
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 12, S. 108-133
ISSN: 2387-4562
Indigenous northerners' rights in the Russian Federation are legally protected at a range of levels (federal, regional, municipal), and by a diversity of types of legal acts (laws, decrees, orders, provisions). Within the complex structure of Russian federalism, the country's regional governments elaborate upon federal laws in diverse ways and at different times. This article explores regional approaches to legislating one law on Indigenous rights, that of "Territory of Traditional Nature-Use" (territoriya traditsionnogo prirodopol'zovaniya) (TTP), identified by Indigenous leaders as the most important legal-territorial designation for protecting Indigenous livelihoods and cultures. While it is well known that legal strategies of the Russian state toward Indigenous territorial rights differ markedly from those of other Circumpolar countries, less appreciated are the ways in which these vary across space within Russia. We assert that the spatial informs the legal, documenting several illustrative approaches that regions have taken in legislating TTPs. In doing so, we demonstrate how a federal law initiative is interpreted and reimagined in place, giving rise to the potential for substantively different spatial outcomes for Indigenous persons and peoples seeking to actualize their rights to territory.