Suchergebnisse

Scholars in COVID Times -- Contents -- Introduction: Considering Meaning for Scholars During the Pandemic -- Part 1. (En)Countering Intensifying Hostilities -- 1. Forming a Motherscholar Research Collaborative -- 2. Timesoup, Missed Meaning, and Making a Pandemic History -- 3. Resisting Anti-Asian Racism in Public-Facing Work and Teaching -- 4. Teaching German in the Settler Colonial University -- Part 2. New Pedagogies and Strategies -- 5. A Chicana Pedagogy for Digital Pen Pals -- 6. Pandemic Community Engagement -- 7. Promoting Equity and Inclusion through Critical Resilience Pedagogy -- 8. Searching for Ōtium and Finding a Pedagogy of Escapism -- 9. Performing Black Lives -- Part 3. Losses and Disappointments -- 10. Community Engaged Migration Research -- 11. Performing Connectedness across Public and Digital Spaces -- 12. Negotiating and Rebuilding Civic Engagement through Loss -- Epilogue: Learning from Our Grief -- Contributors -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Y -- Z.

Takes the Kosovo crisis & NATO's intervention to describe a four-part model that bears on the problem of protecting against genocide. The model focuses on the need to (1) strengthen key actors; (2) articulate a visionary, convincing, & effective policy of prudent genocide prevention; (3) make a policy of carefully targeted & effective sanctions; & (4) develop & implement a sound philosophy of just humanitarian intervention. These facets are discussed in detail, bearing in mind that the collective responsibility to intervene outweighs considerations of sovereignty in cases of genocide. It is hoped that the model serves as an example of the role that political scientists & other scholars can play in supporting efforts to prevent genocide. J. Zendejas

If the American public, after more than twenty years of U.S. involvement in Vietnam, remains confused about the politics and objectives of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, it is primarily because of a steady diet of misinformation conveyed by the U.S. and South Vietnamese governments. The agents of this misinformation are primarily journalists and scholars who depend on the two governments for their facts.During the long struggle in Vietnam it has been vitally important for successive U.S. administrations and their client regimes in Vietnam to persuade the American public of the justification for the intervention that is aimed at keeping local anti-Communists in power. Frequently, therefore, the same political warfare techniques used in Vietnam have been aimed also at the American public.