Suchergebnisse

This essay emphazises as «natural law» represents the core of the concept of «science» in Giambattista Vico. This philosopher, by refusing skepticism on the one hand, and the doctrine of natural law on the other, makes of natural law the focus of various questions, from politics to jurisprudence, from «equity» to the «Reason of State». ; Il saggio evidenzia come il «diritto naturale» rappresenti il cuore nevralgico della «scienza» di Giambattista Vico. Questi, nell'opporsi allo scetticismo, da un lato, e al giusnaturalismo, dall'altro, fa del «diritto naturale» il punto di incontro di molteplici questioni, dalla politica alla giurisprudenza, dall'«equità» alla «Ragion di Stato».

Il lavoro indaga sulle linee evolutive del diritto agrario nella prospettiva europea, ponendo in evidenza le sfide e le criticità che nel XXI secolo hanno connotato le scelte operate nell'ambito della politica agricola comune. All'interno di questa prospettiva, specifica attenzione è assegnata ai temi dell'impresa agricola e della stessa perimetrazione dell'attività agricola; temi risalenti nell'ordinamento italiano, ma rilevanti anche nell'ordinamento polacco, come sottolineato più volte negli studi di Roman Budzinowski. L'analisi investe in particolare le riforme di questo secolo, dalla MTR del 2003 alle riforme del 2013 e del 2021 con la riscoperta dell'agricoltura come attività produttiva, sottolineando l'emergere di nuovi modelli sistemici, che finiscono per costruire Codici europei dell'agricoltura. Vengono poi richiamate le ultime novità introdotte dal Trattato di Lisbona, da alcuni recenti regolamenti in tema di controlli ufficiali e dai documenti della Commissione sul Green Deal europeo, con la connessa attenzione ai temi del benessere animale e della tutela di ogni forma di vita e dell'ambiente nella sua complessità e unità, per concludere che le complesse vicende di questi due primi decenni del XXI secolo si caratterizzano per la crescente attenzione verso le scienze della vita come elemento essenziale e connotante dell'attività dell'impresa agricola in tutte le sue diverse declinazioni. ; W artykule przedstawiono ewolucję prawa rolnego w perspektywie europejskiej, ukazując wyzwania i problemy, które towarzyszyły decyzjom podejmowanym w ramach Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej w XXI wieku. Szczególną uwagę zwrócono na zagadnienia przedsiębiorstwa rolnego oraz granic działalności rolniczej; są to ważne kwestie we włoskim prawie, ale istotne także dla prawa polskiego, co w swoich pracach wielokrotnie podkreślał Roman Budzinowski. W analizie uwzględniono reformy przeprowadzone w XXI wieku, od śródokresowego przeglądu z 2003 r. po reformę z 2013 r., gdy ponownie dostrzeżono w rolnictwie działalność produkcyjną, uwidoczniono także kwestię powstania nowych modeli systemowych, które doprowadziły do stworzenia europejskich kodeksów rolnych. W dalszej kolejności ukazano ostatnie zmiany wprowadzone przez Traktat z Lizbony, wychodząc od niektórych niedawnych rozporządzeń dotyczących kontroli urzędowych oraz dokumentów Komisji w zakresie Europejskiego Zielonego Ładu, z uwzględnieniem kwestii dobrostanu zwierząt, a także ochrony wszystkich form życia i środowiska w jego złożoności i jedności. Pozwoliło to stwierdzić, że wydarzenia pierwszych dwóch dekad XXI wieku skierowały uwagę na nauki o życiu jako ważny element działalności przedsiębiorstwa rolnego we wszystkich jego aspektach. ; The article focuses on the evolutionary trends of agricultural law in a European perspective, highlighting the challenges and problematic issues that have accompanied the choices made in the context of the Common Agricultural Policy in the 21st century. In this perspective, particular attention has been paid to the issues of the agricultural business and the subject of the limits of agricultural activity; these are issues raised in the Italian legal system, but also relevant to the Polish legal system, as Roman Budzinowski has repeatedly stressed in his works. The analysis considers in particular the reforms of the present century, from the Mid-Term Review 2003 to the reforms of 2013 and of 2021, when there occurred a rediscovery of agriculture as a productive activity; it also highlights the emergence of new systemic models that eventually formed the European agricultural codes. Then, the most recent innovations introduced by the Lisbon Treaty are recalled, starting from some recent regulations on official controls and Commission documents on the European Green Deal and animal welfare, to the protection of all forms of life and the environment in its complexity and unity, which leads to the conclusion that the complex events of the first two decades of the 21st century are marked by an increasing attention directed towards the life sciences seen as an essential and distinctive element of the activity of an agricultural enterprise in all its forms.

The paper takes into account a feature of Hans Kelsen's juridical thinking that has been so far rather underestimated: the weight of normativism on his theory of private law. The author closely connects Kelsen's critical approach to the notion of subjective right and further relates the legal norms to the institutions of the market economy. The interepretative assumptions of Kelsen are constantly confronted with the theoretical background that propelled the development of the modern constitutional state based on the rule of law.

Science is facing a fundamental turning point of its history. Never as in this historical moment it appears giant and powerful, but at the same time it shows high fragility: the concentration of information control power in the hands of few commercial groups, the iniquity of a system that benefits developed countries, the restriction of academic autonomy by political and economic power, the precariousness of working conditions of young researchers, the increase in the number of cases of scientific fraud and misconduct, the questioning of its authority by a portion of the public. Can openness be understood as a system capable of strengthening science and treating the diseases that afflict it?

This volume investigates interdisciplinary intersections between law and the humanities from the Renaissance to the present day. It allows for fruitful encounters between different disciplines: from literature to science, from the visual arts to the post-human, from the postmodern novel's experimentation to most recent approaches towards the legal interpretation of literary texts. This productive dialogue fosters original perspectives in the interpretation of and reflection upon identity, justice, power and human rights and values, thus underlining the role of literature in the articulation of relevant cultural issues pertaining to specific periods.

From Kant's cosmopolitan proposal, over and above its placing w it h in t he more specif ic space of doctrine of right, important elements emerge in connection with the project of a "critiue of reason", considered in all its architectural extension, and therefore, ultimately, in relation to what Kant really means by "human reason". And indeed - this is the hypothesis that guides the present work - precisely starting from what the treatment of cosmopolitan law reveals about the complexity of the concept of reason it becomes possible to understand in a theoretically informed way the meaning of the political-legal proposal that pervades Kant's late maturity. In order to verify this hypothesis, the present paper aims, first of all, to highlight the elements of tension in Kant's text which, if they do not always justify, certainly encourage the proliferation of various, of ten no t reconcilable readings of cosmopolitan law and the theme of hospitality; secondly, it aims to reconsider cosmopolitan law in a broader perspective, linked to the way in which Kant conceives the relationship between humanity and rationality; and finally, in the light of this perspective, to re-examine the antagonistic tension that, within the Kantian concept of hospitality, runs through the relations between visitor and visited, host and guest.

As a result of the economic crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, the Italian Competition Authority, following other countries, has increased the use of moral suasion. In the context of antitrust law, this observation allows, on the one hand, to assess the impact of alternative instruments to the classic method that is usually applied in antitrust law: legislation, violation, formal warning, sanction. On the other hand, it suggests shifting attention from rules to behaviour, based on the belief that behavioural dynamics between the logical and mandatory contents of the rules and the actual consequences are underestimated. ; As a result of the economic crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, the Italian Competition Authority, following other countries, has increased the use of moral suasion. In the context of antitrust law, this observation allows, on the one hand, to assess the impact of alternative instruments to the classic method that is usually applied in antitrust law: legislation, violation, formal warning, sanction. On the other hand, it suggests shifting attention from rules to behaviour, based on the belief that behavioural dynamics between the logical and mandatory contents of the rules and the actual consequences are underestimated.