Suchergebnisse

Arikel ini bertujuan untuk memahami dinamika sosial politik masyarakat Desa Rias terkait kontestasi politik pemilihan legislatif tahun 2019. Khususnya tentang faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kegagalan Calon Legislatif dari Desa rias pada momentum pemilu tahun 2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Kualitatif model deskriptif dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa terdapat beberapa hal dan kondisi yang saling berkaitan yang melatarbelakangi kegagalan calon legislatif dari Desa Rias, yaitu; (1) Konstelasi politik masyarakat. (2) Perilaku politik masyarakat yang bersikap kritis kepada caleg dari dalam desa tetapi tidak kritis terhadap caleg dari luar desa. (3) Figur caleg dari dalam desa yang mendapatkan stigma negatif ketika mendekati pemilihan. (4) Tim sukses/relawan caleg yang tidak solid, tidak berpengalaman, hanya memanfaatkan uang para caleg dan tidak fokus memenangkan caleg dari dalam desa, dan terakhir (5) Biaya atau cost politik caleg yang kecil. Selain itu penelitian ini juga menyimpulkan bahwa aspek primordialisme dalam kontestasi politik desa telah kehilangan pengaruhnya. Pilihan politik masyarakat desa lebih ditentukan oleh konstruksi rasionalitas dari pada hubungan primordial dengan aktor politik.AbstractIThis study aims to understand the social and political dynamics of the Rias society related to the political contestation in the legislative elections in 2019. Especially the cause of the failure of the legislative candidates from Rias Village In the 2019 elections. This study uses a qualitative method with data collection techniques in the form of interviews, observation, and documentation. This research found several things and interrelated conditions that underlie the failure of legislative candidates from Rias Village, i.e; (1) The political constellation of society. (2) Political behavior is critical to candidates from within but not to candidates from outside the village. (3) A figure of candidates who get a negative stigma when almost an election. (4) Team and volunteer candidates who are not solid, inexperienced, take advantage of candidate's money and not focused on winning candidates, and finally (5) Political costs of candidates. The factors that caused society to vote outside candidates are (a) The Political Constellation, (b) a Figure of Candidates, (c) Team, and (d) Political Cost. Besides, the primordialism aspect of political contestation in the village has lost its influence. The political choices of rural communities are more determined by rational construction than primordial relationships with political actors.

Supervision is not just a mere supervision, especially if it's just to find fault. Supervision starts from planning, implementing, reporting and finally follow up from the results of supervision. This research was conducted to analyze the Follow-up of Supervision Results conducted by the Regional Inspectorate of Indramayu Regency. Follow-up to Supervision Results are reviewed from the APIP policy aspects of the implementation of completion of Oversight Results Follow-up, audited responses to audit findings, causes of audit findings, audited responses to delays in Follow-up Monitoring Results. More in this study wants to examine the steps of policy makers in completing the findings of the Audit Results Report.The Examination Result Report contains findings, conditions, causes, consequences and recommendations for recommendations that must be followed up by the Regional Work Unit (SKPD) which is examined to correct errors in the implementation of the administration of the general government and government implementation affairs that occur in the SKPD examined. The follow-up itself aims to improve and improve the quality of good and clean governanceFactors that cause low or not yet achieved completion of follow-up include lack of leadership commitment or change of leadership in the work unit / work unit, so that new leaders are less concerned about the follow-up of the results of supervision because they feel it is not their responsibility. The cause of the findings (disobedience to the legislation and the weakness of the internal control system) and the delay in following up on the findings of the examination include internal factors and external factors. Internal factors include leadership and subordinate human resources, lack of subordinate human resource capabilities and leadership managerial abilities. An external factor is the third party's lack of discipline regarding the findings of the examination and the existence of social problems in the community.In order to resolve the follow-up to the audit results, it is necessary to conduct direct monitoring efforts, namely by reviewing directly to the audited work unit / work unit accompanied by a value test of the findings of the audit completed with the Follow-Up Update Minutes. While the indirect update is carried out based on a value test of supporting documents / evidence submitted by the work unit / work unit as a follow-up to the auditor's recommendations.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap keterkaitan demokrasi dengan kekuasaan adat dalam menangani eks pengungsi Timor-Leste di Kabupaten Belu, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia, terkait dengan praktik demokrasi. Lebih spesifiknya, demokrasi dibatasi pada konteks potensi eksklusi akses Dana Desa bagi penduduk baru. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan studi kasus untuk mengungkap praktik demokrasi terkait implementasi Dana Desa yang terjalin erat dengan budaya lokal. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah penduduk baru di Desa Fatuba'a yang secara geografis berdekatan dengan perbatasan antara Indonesia dan Timor-Leste. Hampir separuh dari penduduk Fatuba'a adalah penduduk baru eks pengungsi Timor-Leste. Banyaknya penduduk baru telah menjadi masalah sosial yang kompleks bagi Desa Fatuba'a. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi observasi, wawancara mendalam, dan diskusi kelompok terfokus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa lembaga adat memiliki peran yang signifikan dalam mendistribusikan kekuasaan baik dalam aspek pemerintahan maupun pembangunan desa, termasuk dalam penyaluran penggunaan dana desa. Suku Liudasik merupakan suku dominan yang berhasil mendapatkan legitimasi penduduk baru dengan memberikan tanah ulayat sebagai tempat tinggal dan bercocok tanam atas kontribusi mereka untuk memilih kepala desa dari suku Liudasik. Dalam konteks Dana Desa, penggunaannya juga menunjukkan adanya saling ketergantungan antara penghuni baru dengan suku Liudasik. Dengan demikian, penduduk baru memiliki akses ke dana desa. Tidak ada eksklusi terhadap penduduk baru untuk penggunaan Dana Desa Fatuba'a. Ketergantungan penduduk baru pada lembaga adat telah melanggengkan kekuasaan adat suku Liudasik. ; This research aims to reveal the relations between democracy and customary power in handling the East Timorese ex-refugees in Belu Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia, related to democratic practices More specifically, democracy is limited to the context of potential exclusion access of the Village Fund for new residents. This research used a qualitative and case studies approach to reveal democratic practices related to the implementation of Village Funds that are intertwined with the local culture. The subjects in this research were new residents in Fatuba'a Village which is geographically close to the cross-border between Indonesia and East Timor. Nearly half of Fatuba'a's populations are new residents who are East Timorese ex-refugees. A large number of new residents have become a complex social problem for Fatuba'a Village. The data collection techniques consist of observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions. The results showed that customary institutions play a significant role in distributing power both in aspects of government and village development, including the distribution of village funds-use. The Liudasik tribe is a successful dominant tribe obtaining legitimacy of the new residents by granting customary land as a place to live and farming for their contribution to elect the village head from the Liudasik tribe. In the context of the Village Fund, its use also shows the interdependence between new residents and the Liudasik tribe. Consequently, the new residents have an access to village funds. There is no exclusion of new residents for the Fatuba'a's Village Fund-use. The dependence of new residents on customary institutions has perpetuated the customary power of the Liudasik tribe.