Portugal: a democratic revolution heading towards socialism
In: Boletim de Ciências Económicas, Band 57, Heft 2, S. 2249-2274
52 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Boletim de Ciências Económicas, Band 57, Heft 2, S. 2249-2274
El presente texto es una síntesis de ponencias e intervenciones que he realizado sobreel tema en los últimos tiempos, y como tal fue leída en el acto de apertura del VIEncuentro Latinoamericano de Revistas Marxistas celebrado en Montevideo enseptiembre del año 2000. Con ello, señalo la valorización del concepto de sociedad civilen la obra de Carlos Marx, donde la tesis del desaparecimiento del Estado coincide conla subsunción de las funciones políticas y administrativas por las organizacionespopulares de la sociedad. ; The present text is a synthesis of talks and comments that I have delivered onthis topic recently. It was presented at the opening ceremony of the SixthLatin American Meeting of Marxist Journals, held in Montevideo inSeptember 2000. I underscore the valorization of the concept of civil societyin Karl Marx's work. The disappearance of the State hypothesized by Marx isaccompanied by the assumption of political and administrative functions bythe popular organizations of society.
BASE
In: Griot: Revista de Filosofia, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 175-190
This paper aims to discuss the socio-economic regimes that allow the realization of justice as fairness, focusing in particular on the two regimes pointed out by Rawls as capable of constituting a well-ordered society, the property-owning democracy (POD) on the one hand and liberal socialism on the other. To this end, we will first consider Rawls' arguments regarding socio-economic regimes within A theory of justice. Then, based on Justice as fairness: a restatement, the arguments in favor of POD and liberal socialism and against the other three options: laissez-faire capitalism, one-party state socialism, and the welfare state will be discussed. Next, the arguments in favor of either POD or liberal socialism will be considered, largely seeking to draw what the distinctions between the two regimes are, from those authors who seek to go beyond Rawls. At the end, it is concluded that within the limits of a theory of justice Rawls is correct in not defining who is the winning regime, the POD or liberal socialism, but in the current advance of liberal capitalism and its movement away from liberal democracies it shows necessary to discuss which is the most adequate regime from the bases provided by justice as fairness.
In: Documentos políticos do Partido Comunista Português 2
In: Politica & sociedade: revista de sociologia politica, Band 7, Heft 13, S. 17-33
ISSN: 1677-4140
In: Politica & sociedade: revista de sociologia politica, Band 7, Heft 13, S. 251-264
ISSN: 1677-4140
In: Res-Publica: revista de ciência política, segurança e relações internacionais, Band 3, Heft 5-6, S. 73-80
ISSN: 1645-8931