Članak istražuje načine na koje se odvija interakcija između osječkog kazališta i njegova okruženja u vrijeme Prvoga svjetskog rata, modele međusobnog uvjetovanja, status osječkog kazališta u mikrosredini te društva u osječkom kazalištu, kao i odnose između kazališta i gledatelja te kazališta i politike kako bi se nadopisao jedan manje poznat segment dugovječne povijesti Hrvatskog narodnog kazališta u Osijeku. ; This article explores the way in which Osijek's theater interacted with its environment during the time of the First World War, models of mutual conditioning, the status of Osijek's theater within its microcosm, the society in Osijek's theater, and the relationship between theater and patron as well as theater and politics, so as to flesh out a less-known section of the long history of the Croatian National Theater in Osijek.
U drugoj polovici 19. stoljeća Dalmacija je bila poprište žestokih sukoba autonomaša i narodnjaka. Upravo u tom razdoblju funkciju gradonačelnika Splita obnašao je Antonio Bajamonti, vođa autonomaške stranke. Bajamonti je ambicioznim graditeljskim pothvatima Split htio uzdići na razinu razvijenog europskog grada. Ovaj rad je usmjeren na gradnje koje su ostvarene na Marmontovom perivoju, terenu kojeg je u prvoj polovici 19. stoljeća namjeravao urediti francuski general Auguste Marmont. Kako bi se istakala povezanost Dalmacije s talijanskom kulturom za projekte na Marmontovom perivoju bili su angažirani talijanski arhitekti i umjetnici. Nakon pobjede narodnjaka na lokalnim izborima 1882. godine Bajamontijeve zasluge za grad Split počele su se sustavno osporavati. Bajamontijevim graditeljskim ostvarenjimasu od tog vremena, a posebno za vrijeme talijanske okupacije Dalmacije, pripisane pogrešne političke konotacije, a time pogrešan sud o umjetničkoj vrijednosti. Iz navedenih razloga ta vrijedna umjetnička postignuća druge polovice 19. stoljeća ostala su zanemarena sve do danas. ; In the second half of the 19th century, Dalmatia was the center of fierce clashes between autonomists and populists. It was during this period that the role of Mayor of Split was held by Antonio Bajamonti, the leader of the autonomous party. Bajamonti wanted to elevate Split to the level of a developed European city through ambitious construction projects. This paper is focused on the works that were done on the MarmontPark, a terrain intended to be arranged by French General Auguste Marmont in the first half of the 19thcentury. For projects at the Marmont Park, Italian architects and artists were hired to highlight Dalmatia's connection to Italian culture. After the victory of the populists in the local elections of 1882, Bajamonti's merits for the city of Split began to be systematically challenged. From that time, especially during the Italian occupation of Dalmatia, Bayamonti's architectural achievements were attributed to the wrong political connotations, and thus the wrong judgment about artistic value. For these reasons, these valuable artistic achievements of the second half of the 19th century have been neglected to this day.
Neprofitne organizacije pripadaju neprofitnom sektoru, koji se još naziva i treći sektor. Prema svom postojanju mogu biti vladine i nevladine neprofitne organizacije. Misija njihova postojanja nije osnivanje profita, već rješavanje društvenih problema te pružanje usluga društvu. Cilj ovog rada je analiza neprofitnih organizacija u Republici Hrvatskoj, utvrđivanje razlike između vladinih i nevladinih neprofitnih organizacija te istražiti u kolikoj mjeri neprofitne organizacije u svom radu koriste neprofitni menadžment i marketing. Istraživanje je provedeno na primjeru dvije neprofitne organizacije koje djeluju u Republici Hrvatskoj, a čije područje djelovanja je kultura. Analizirane neprofitne organizacije su Udruga KultAkt te ustanova Gradsko kazalište Požega. Neke od utvrđenih razlika između neprofitnih organizacija koje se razlikuju po vlasništvu su financiranje, korištenje fundraisingom te prisustvo volontera u organizaciji. ; Nonprofit organizations belong to the nonprofit sector, also called the third sector. According to their existence, they can be governmental and non-governmental nonprofit organizations. Mission of their existence are not establishing profit, but solving social problems and providing services to the society. The aim of this paper is to analyze the non-profit organizations in the Republic of Croatia, to identify the differences between governmental and non-governmental nonprofit organizations and also investigate does nonprofit organizations use nonprofit management and marketing in their work. The research was conducted by the example of two nonprofit organizations operating in the Republic of Croatia, whose field of activity is culture. The analyzed nonprofit organizations are the Association KultAkt and the institution Town Theater Požega. Some of identified distinctions between nonprofit organizations that differ in ownership are financing, fundraising and presence of volunteers in the organization.
Neprofitne organizacije pripadaju neprofitnom sektoru, koji se još naziva i treći sektor. Prema svom postojanju mogu biti vladine i nevladine neprofitne organizacije. Misija njihova postojanja nije osnivanje profita, već rješavanje društvenih problema te pružanje usluga društvu. Cilj ovog rada je analiza neprofitnih organizacija u Republici Hrvatskoj, utvrđivanje razlike između vladinih i nevladinih neprofitnih organizacija te istražiti u kolikoj mjeri neprofitne organizacije u svom radu koriste neprofitni menadžment i marketing. Istraživanje je provedeno na primjeru dvije neprofitne organizacije koje djeluju u Republici Hrvatskoj, a čije područje djelovanja je kultura. Analizirane neprofitne organizacije su Udruga KultAkt te ustanova Gradsko kazalište Požega. Neke od utvrđenih razlika između neprofitnih organizacija koje se razlikuju po vlasništvu su financiranje, korištenje fundraisingom te prisustvo volontera u organizaciji. ; Nonprofit organizations belong to the nonprofit sector, also called the third sector. According to their existence, they can be governmental and non-governmental nonprofit organizations. Mission of their existence are not establishing profit, but solving social problems and providing services to the society. The aim of this paper is to analyze the non-profit organizations in the Republic of Croatia, to identify the differences between governmental and non-governmental nonprofit organizations and also investigate does nonprofit organizations use nonprofit management and marketing in their work. The research was conducted by the example of two nonprofit organizations operating in the Republic of Croatia, whose field of activity is culture. The analyzed nonprofit organizations are the Association KultAkt and the institution Town Theater Požega. Some of identified distinctions between nonprofit organizations that differ in ownership are financing, fundraising and presence of volunteers in the organization.
U članku je analiziran sovjetski pogled na zbivanja u drugoj najvećoj jugoslavenskoj republici tijekom druge polovine 50-ih i prve polovine 60-ih godina. Uzeta je u obzir situacija u Jugoslaviji i međusobni odnosi Beograda i Moskve. Dosad su se povjesničari zanimali prije svega za političku dimenziju međusobnih odnosa i sovjetske ocjene političkoga stanja u Jugoslaviji. Iako su politika i ideologija bile u centru pozornosti sovjetskih diplomata, u članku nisu zanemarena ni kulturna zbivanja u Federativnoj Narodnoj Republici Jugoslaviji (od 1963. Socijalističkoj Federativnoj Republici Jugoslaviji) ni gospodarski položaj zemlje. Ove su dimenzije čvrsto povezivali s političkom sferom te podređivali sovjetskim interesima prema Jugoslaviji. Članak je utemeljen na izvornoj arhivskoj građi prikupljenoj u Moskvi u Ruskom državnom arhivu novije povijesti (Российский государственный архив новейшей истории), u fondu Odjela za veze s komunističkim i radničkim partijama socijalističkih zemalja, koji je odgovarao za odnose sa zemljama komunističkoga uređenja. U radu je korištena i relevantna stručna literatura. ; The Soviet view of Croatia, as well as the situation in Yugoslavia, resulted from Soviet interests, its efforts to draw Yugoslavia into its orbit of influence. Particular reluctance was evident on the realm of ideology and purported Western influence, the effectiveness of which was exaggerated in the Soviet documents. In the political dimension, the Kremlin was interested to which extent directives from the center were implemented at the republican level. The attitudes of local politicians toward the actions of the central authorities were also the matter of interest for Soviets. The fact that Croatia was the second richest republic and its aspiration for greater decision-making were regarded as negative phenomenon. Discussions about the competencies of the republics were depicted as closely tied to the national question, referring to the difficult experiences of the first half of the 20th century. In the economic and cultural sphere, there was particular interest in the possibilities of cooperation and building up one's own influence in the Croatian SR. Despite the negative perception of many phenomena in Yugoslav culture, where a critical stance toward the USSR was expressed in film, literature, and the press, Moscow believed that through the presence of Soviet culture - often such as music and theater - it would be possible to gradually gain approval of the public sphere. The Kremlin's propaganda, however, was not as effective in Yugoslavia-as it was throughout the world-as it was in the West. The Soviets paid more attention to events in the center of the country, although they did not ignore regional events either.
