We provide here information on youth projects of the Inter-regional Scholarly and Educational Center for the investigation of V.S. Solovyov's legacy (the Solovyov Seminar). We note the importance of using various extracurricular means to introduce students to the theoretical and practical aspects of V.S. Solovyov's legacy and those of other representatives of Russian philosophy and culture. This essay provides a survey of the student-run scholarly conference "Ideas, Events, People: Through the Pages of the Journal Solovyov Studies," marking the journal's 20th anniversary. We give an analysis of the topics presented at the conference and identify the philosophical problems that aroused the greatest interest among the participants.
This article considers the issue of the continuity and discontinuity of the historical process within the legacy of the Russian philosophers of the first half of the twentieth century. Its main task is to reconstruct their understanding of the category of discontinuity in relation to social sciences and the humanities in the works of N.V. Bugaev, V.G. Alekseev, P.A. Florensky, V.F. Ern, and L.P. Karsavin. This task is accomplished by carrying out a comparative historical study of the works of these philosophers in the context of their mutual influence and of how the given topics are developed. The research, which was conducted mainly on the existing historiography of the Moscow School of Philosophy and Mathematics, identifies a number of lacunae regarding the category of continuity/discontinuity. While this issue was first raised by Nikolai Bugaev and Vissarion Alekseev, it was Pavel Florensky who suggested a solution to the problem by applying the theory of discontinuous functions used in arithmology to the historical process. Florensky's efforts were initially fruitless, however, and it was not until after 1905 that he succeeded in doing so. It has been proven that Vladimir Ern radicalized Florensky's thoughts and made significant progress in understanding the topic of discontinuity within the historical process and the progress of mankind. Considerable attention is also paid to the reasons for the repressions enacted against the Moscow school during the Soviet period. Finally, Lev Karsavin's relationship with this line of study of discontinuity in Russian philosophy is clarified and the place of Karsavin's early and late works in the study of the category of continuity and discontinuity in the history of mankind is also considered. The conclusion of this article deals with the relevance of this legacy of Russian philosophers in contemporary epistemology and the methodology of history.
The article discusses the use of the focus group method as part of the educational process for non-core sociological areas. It considers the methodology of the focus groups method within the framework of the "Philosophy" course at Moscow University for the Humanities, as well as the "History of Political Studies" course at the Moscow State Institute of Culture. As part of the classes, the students were trained in focus groups; they were divided into research groups of 2-3 people and were assigned tasks in the framework of the studied discipline. The complexity of the topic of the task varied according to the level of mastering the discipline. The deadline was assigned depending on the progress of the educational process from 2 to 3 weeks.The focus group method helps to teach students research work within the framework of the specified courses, contributes to teaching them team work and communication, allows the student to obtain additional information on the topics of the course, and to develop their human potential. Moreover, this method can be used to research the interests of students themselves.The result of the research work was the preparation and conduct of focus groups by the students, as well as the preparation of a research report, supplemented by video materials. During the courses, two studies were conducted, from more general topics that do not require special preparation to topics implying an extensive knowledge of the course materials. ; В статье рассматривается применение метода фокусированного интервью в рамках учебного процесса для непрофильных социологических направлений. Рассматривается методика метода фокус-групп в рамках учебного курса «Философия» в Московском гуманитарном университете, а также учебного курса «История политических учений» в Московском государственном институте культуры. На занятиях студенты обучались методике проведения фокус-групп, разбивались на исследовательские группы по два-три человека и получали задание в рамках изучаемой дисциплины. В зависимости от уровня освоения дисциплины сложность темы задания варьировалась. Срок выполнения назначался в зависимости от хода учебного процесса от двух до трех недель.Метод фокус-групп помогает обучать исследовательской работе студентов в рамках указанных курсов, способствует обучению их командной работе и коммуникации, позволяет студенту получить дополнительную информацию по темам курса, развивать их человеческий потенциал. Также этот метод может служить для исследования интересов самой студенческой молодежи.Результатом исследовательской работы были подготовка и проведение учащимися фокус-группы, подготовка отчета исследования, дополненного видеоматериалами. В течение курсов проводилось два исследования, от более общих тем, не требующих специальной подготовки, к темам, предполагающим освоение в значительной мере материалов курса.
The authors outline the key topics of contemporary social science by analyzing journal articles, indexed in SCOPUS and Web of Knowledge. For this purpose, the journals have been divided into three clusters: "Sociology and social sciences", "Political theory and political philosophy" and "International studies". An additional cluster is considered, which contains Russian journals recently included in SCOPUS. In each cluster several journals have been randomly chosen (at least three) and abstracts of all the articles published in these journals in 2013 have been analyzed by methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis.Key words: Index, Database, Social Sciences and Humanities, Content-analysis, Theme, Subject, Theory, Scopus, Web of Knowledge. ; Авторами выделены актуальные темы современного обществознания на материале статей социально-гуманитарной направленности, индексируемых в базах данных Scopus и Web of Knowledge. Для этого из перечня журналов сформированы четыре кластера: «Социология и социологические науки», «Политическая теория и политическая философия», «Исследования в области международных отношений», «Психологические исследования». Отдельно рассматриваются российские журналы, недавно вошедшие в базу данных Scopus. На основе случайной выборки журналов по каждому кластеру (не менее трех журналов) с помощью методов количественного и качественного анализа обработаны абстракты статей, опубликованных в каждом журнале в течение 2013 и в начале 2014 г. Результаты проведенной работы отражены в заключительной части статьи.Ключевые слова: индекс, база данных, количественный и качественный методы, Scopus, Web of Knowledge.
Despite the fact that in Russia patriotic rhetoric is very widespread, and there are state supported programmes for the patriotic education of young people, still the citizens have no clear understanding of what kind of patriotism is offered to them. Russian scholars either insist on the necessity of patriotic education, or consider this issue from the point of view of applied sociology. In this article, the author considers patriotism as a multidimensional theoretical concept; he analyses in which discursive contexts patriotism is debated in contemporary social philosophy and political theory. He singles out several models of "patriotic projects" which are advocated by social philosophers despite overall criticism and denunciation of patriotic ideas.Using Russian context as a ground for his considerations, the author compares Russian patriotic rhetoric with the conclusions of scholars and thinkers in the West. Instead of emphasising in patriotic education the topics of foreign enemies and militarisation, the official propaganda can start to appeal to principles of "constitutional patriotism": not just love for the country, but respect for the law, for the established democratic institutions, desire to participate in the development of civil society, etc. This research is not merely an attempt to fill all the lacunas in Russian patriotic discourse; it aspires to bring the debate to a new theoretical level of discussion. ; Несмотря на то что в России активно используется патриотическая риторика, а на официальном уровне осуществляются программы по патриотическому воспитанию молодежи, у граждан нет четкого понимания, какой именно патриотизм им предлагается. Отечественные ученые либо точно так же настаивают на необходимости патриотического воспитания, либо обращаются к проблеме с точки зрения прикладной социологии. Автор обсуждает многогранные теоретические аспекты патриотизма, рассматривая, в каких дискурсивных контекстах про патриотизм спорят современные социальные философы и политические теоретики, выделяет несколько моделей «патриотического проекта», отстаиваемых социальными философами, несмотря на критику и осуждение патриотической идеи.На примере российских реалий автор соотносит отечественную патриотическую риторику с теми выводами, к которым уже пришли мыслители и ученые на Западе. Вместо того чтобы делать акцент в патриотическом воспитании на конструировании внешних врагов и на милитаризации, официальная пропаганда может позаимствовать отстаиваемые «конституционным патриотизмом» принципы — любовь не просто к стране, но уважение к закону, к сложившимся демократическим институтам, желание поучаствовать в формировании гражданского общества и т. д. Настоящее исследование — не столько попытка восполнить этот пробел, сколько намерение перевести научную дискуссию на новый, теоретический уровень.
The purpose of the article is to demonstrate an influence of Jewish salons of Berlin on the intellectual life of Prussia at the turn of the XVIII–XIX centuries. As a form of communication, salon is characterized with an active participation of women in «traditionally» men's discussions on politics, philosophy and literature. Woman, as a rule, an aristocrat, selected a public at her discretion and moderated a conversation. A blossom of salon culture in Prussia took place at the second quarter of the XVIII century. Influence of Jewish salons on intellectual life of the kingdom is consided to be a one of the topics-in-question for researchers in this field. Deborah Hertz, Petra Wilhelmy-Dollinger and Renata Fuchs are inclined to represent Jewish salons as a phenomenon of a great significance for both Prussian Jews' life and cultural climat of German- speaking space. Hannah Lund and Barbara Hahn assess Jewish salons as one of integrative channels at the turn of the XVIII–XIX centuries. The sourse base of this article is presented with a wide correspondense and memoires by actors of salon communication in Berlin, as well as with satirical writings. In this article, the most famous Jewish salons' hostesses — Henriette Herz and Rahel Levin — are presented. High social position of Jewish women's families, as well as their accomplishment and originality incited a great interest to them. Eminent German cultural activists were among the guests of Jewish salons. Intensive communication with Jewish women affected creativity of German authors. So, it is traced in the present article, how a friendship of Henriette Herz with Friedrich Schleiermacher influenced on his formation as a founder of the original religious concept. Also, a role of Dorothea Mendelsohn in Friedrich Schlegel's life and creativity is highlighted. A special attention is paid to the Jewish women's literary activity as an important component of cultural integration. On a Dorothea Mendelsohn's example, author makes an attempt to demonstrate that affiliation to salon circles gave Jewish women a possibility to start their literary activity. Author of the present article traces a reaction of Prussian conservative literary circles to a popularity of Jewish salons. On examples of Friedrich Nicolai and August Bernhardi is demonstrated, how a fear of feminization and Jewish integration are reflected in Prussian satire at the end of the XVIII century.
A native of Belarus, publicist, critic and author of poetic texts Vladimir Samoilo (1878–1941) is well known as a teacher of Yanka Kupala and a popularizer of his poetry. He is also known as a correspondent of Alexander Blok and an author of works about his creations, as well as a prominent figure of the Belarusian national movement. However, his participation in the Russian periodical press and in the social and cultural life in Wilno is insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study is to fill this gap. Samoilo was the organizer of the evenings of the famous Russian writers Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Zinaida Gippius, Dmitry Filosofov in 1920. He participated in discussions about the works of the Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev, organized by the Literary-artistic section of the Wilno Russian society in 1925. He was elected a member of the council of the Religious-philosophical section of the Wilno Russian society in 1927. Later, Samoilo became vice-chairman of the Religious-philosophical section. Samoilo was the author of a large statement at the solemn assembly on the 50th anniversary of the death of Fyodor Dostoevsky in 1931. At the meetings of the Religious-philosophical circle, Samoilo made reports on Russian philosophers Ivan Kireevsky, Pyotr Chaadayev and others. Newspapers "Vilenskoe slovo", "Vilenskaya misl", "Utro" published Samoilo's articles on the topics of domestic and international politics as well as economy. He was the editor and publisher of the newspaper "Vilenskaya rech", where he published articles about the works of Alexander Blok and Fyodor Dostoevsky as well about the historiosophic concept of Marian Zdziechowski. He had conflicts with the newspaper "Vilenskoe utro". Samoilo's cooperation in the newspaper "Nashe vremia" was accompanied by a polemic with the Warsaw newspaper "Za svobodu!" and its head Dmitry Filosofov about Alexander Blok's poem "The Twelve". The most important Samoilo's publications in the "Nashe vremia" newspaper are devoted to the history of Russian literature and philosophy, as well to discussions in the Religious and philosophical circle of the Wilno Russian society. The analysis of the collected information clarifies the existing knowledge about the activities and views of Samoilo in the Wilno period and complements the general picture of the life of the Russian minority in the Wilno region and in the interwar Poland as a whole. Despite the contradictions and conflicts with certain representatives of the Russian society in Wilno, Vladimir Samoilo was its active and influential participant.
A native of Belarus, publicist, critic and author of poetic texts Vladimir Samoilo (1878–1941) is well known as a teacher of Yanka Kupala and a popularizer of his poetry. He is also known as a correspondent of Alexander Blok and an author of works about his creations, as well as a prominent figure of the Belarusian national movement. However, his participation in the Russian periodical press and in the social and cultural life in Wilno is insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study is to fill this gap. Samoilo was the organizer of the evenings of the famous Russian writers Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Zinaida Gippius, Dmitry Filosofov in 1920. He participated in discussions about the works of the Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev, organized by the Literary-artistic section of the Wilno Russian society in 1925. He was elected a member of the council of the Religious-philosophical section of the Wilno Russian society in 1927. Later, Samoilo became vice-chairman of the Religious-philosophical section. Samoilo was the author of a large statement at the solemn assembly on the 50th anniversary of the death of Fyodor Dostoevsky in 1931. At the meetings of the Religious-philosophical circle, Samoilo made reports on Russian philosophers Ivan Kireevsky, Pyotr Chaadayev and others. Newspapers "Vilenskoe slovo", "Vilenskaya misl", "Utro" published Samoilo's articles on the topics of domestic and international politics as well as economy. He was the editor and publisher of the newspaper "Vilenskaya rech", where he published articles about the works of Alexander Blok and Fyodor Dostoevsky as well about the historiosophic concept of Marian Zdziechowski. He had conflicts with the newspaper "Vilenskoe utro". Samoilo's cooperation in the newspaper "Nashe vremia" was accompanied by a polemic with the Warsaw newspaper "Za svobodu!" and its head Dmitry Filosofov about Alexander Blok's poem "The Twelve". The most important Samoilo's publications in the "Nashe vremia" newspaper are devoted to the history of Russian literature and philosophy, as well to discussions in the Religious and philosophical circle of the Wilno Russian society. The analysis of the collected information clarifies the existing knowledge about the activities and views of Samoilo in the Wilno period and complements the general picture of the life of the Russian minority in the Wilno region and in the interwar Poland as a whole. Despite the contradictions and conflicts with certain representatives of the Russian society in Wilno, Vladimir Samoilo was its active and influential participant.
A native of Belarus, publicist, critic and author of poetic texts Vladimir Samoilo (1878–1941) is well known as a teacher of Yanka Kupala and a popularizer of his poetry. He is also known as a correspondent of Alexander Blok and an author of works about his creations, as well as a prominent figure of the Belarusian national movement. However, his participation in the Russian periodical press and in the social and cultural life in Wilno is insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study is to fill this gap. Samoilo was the organizer of the evenings of the famous Russian writers Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Zinaida Gippius, Dmitry Filosofov in 1920. He participated in discussions about the works of the Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev, organized by the Literary-artistic section of the Wilno Russian society in 1925. He was elected a member of the council of the Religious-philosophical section of the Wilno Russian society in 1927. Later, Samoilo became vice-chairman of the Religious-philosophical section. Samoilo was the author of a large statement at the solemn assembly on the 50th anniversary of the death of Fyodor Dostoevsky in 1931. At the meetings of the Religious-philosophical circle, Samoilo made reports on Russian philosophers Ivan Kireevsky, Pyotr Chaadayev and others. Newspapers "Vilenskoe slovo", "Vilenskaya misl", "Utro" published Samoilo's articles on the topics of domestic and international politics as well as economy. He was the editor and publisher of the newspaper "Vilenskaya rech", where he published articles about the works of Alexander Blok and Fyodor Dostoevsky as well about the historiosophic concept of Marian Zdziechowski. He had conflicts with the newspaper "Vilenskoe utro". Samoilo's cooperation in the newspaper "Nashe vremia" was accompanied by a polemic with the Warsaw newspaper "Za svobodu!" and its head Dmitry Filosofov about Alexander Blok's poem "The Twelve". The most important Samoilo's publications in the "Nashe vremia" newspaper are devoted to the history of Russian literature and philosophy, as well to discussions in the Religious and philosophical circle of the Wilno Russian society. The analysis of the collected information clarifies the existing knowledge about the activities and views of Samoilo in the Wilno period and complements the general picture of the life of the Russian minority in the Wilno region and in the interwar Poland as a whole. Despite the contradictions and conflicts with certain representatives of the Russian society in Wilno, Vladimir Samoilo was its active and influential participant.
A native of Belarus, publicist, critic and author of poetic texts Vladimir Samoilo (1878–1941) is well known as a teacher of Yanka Kupala and a popularizer of his poetry. He is also known as a correspondent of Alexander Blok and an author of works about his creations, as well as a prominent figure of the Belarusian national movement. However, his participation in the Russian periodical press and in the social and cultural life in Wilno is insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study is to fill this gap. Samoilo was the organizer of the evenings of the famous Russian writers Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Zinaida Gippius, Dmitry Filosofov in 1920. He participated in discussions about the works of the Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev, organized by the Literary-artistic section of the Wilno Russian society in 1925. He was elected a member of the council of the Religious-philosophical section of the Wilno Russian society in 1927. Later, Samoilo became vice-chairman of the Religious-philosophical section. Samoilo was the author of a large statement at the solemn assembly on the 50th anniversary of the death of Fyodor Dostoevsky in 1931. At the meetings of the Religious-philosophical circle, Samoilo made reports on Russian philosophers Ivan Kireevsky, Pyotr Chaadayev and others. Newspapers "Vilenskoe slovo", "Vilenskaya misl", "Utro" published Samoilo's articles on the topics of domestic and international politics as well as economy. He was the editor and publisher of the newspaper "Vilenskaya rech", where he published articles about the works of Alexander Blok and Fyodor Dostoevsky as well about the historiosophic concept of Marian Zdziechowski. He had conflicts with the newspaper "Vilenskoe utro". Samoilo's cooperation in the newspaper "Nashe vremia" was accompanied by a polemic with the Warsaw newspaper "Za svobodu!" and its head Dmitry Filosofov about Alexander Blok's poem "The Twelve". The most important Samoilo's publications in the "Nashe vremia" newspaper are devoted to the history of Russian literature and philosophy, as well to discussions in the Religious and philosophical circle of the Wilno Russian society. The analysis of the collected information clarifies the existing knowledge about the activities and views of Samoilo in the Wilno period and complements the general picture of the life of the Russian minority in the Wilno region and in the interwar Poland as a whole. Despite the contradictions and conflicts with certain representatives of the Russian society in Wilno, Vladimir Samoilo was its active and influential participant.
The article is an overview of a prominent scientific event — The Second Russian Congress of Aesthetics (Yekaterinburg, July 2021). The paper assesses the state of aesthetics as a scientific and educational discipline throughout its history of the Soviet and post-Soviet periods. The article highlights four stages of the Soviet history of aesthetics. The first stage, the 1930s, received following K. Clark, the nomination "return of aesthetics", which was associated with the general conservative turn of the Stalinist cultural policy, the creation of the socialist realist canon, the program of building socialism, the denial of the functionalism of the previous (avant-garde) stage. The "return of aesthetics" had not only a political and pragmatic content but contributed to the saturation of Soviet culture with fragments of the classical heritage, primarily the philosophical one. At the second stage (late Stalinism), there was a rollback of aesthetics in the direction of extreme political instrumentalization. During a short period of the "thaw," aesthetics began to go behind public liberal discourse, yielding leadership to journalism and art criticism. At the stage of the "long seventies", aesthetics becomes an influential and in-demand scientific discipline, included in the program of "technical progress" and "education of the builder of communism", important ideological, aesthetic, and applied tasks are assigned to aesthetics since it is expected to influence all spheres of life. Aesthetics as philosophy and science develops, responding to contacts with semiotics, psychology, anthropology, cultural history, and sociology. Relying on the selective stream of translations of Western art philosophy, Soviet aesthetics begins to resonate with world trends, which is facilitated by the tacit consensus of the idea of aesthetics as a part of philosophical and humanitarian knowledge that has its autonomy. The state of aesthetics in the 1990s and early 2000s is qualified as a change of scientific generations and the emergence of new groups of professionals in aesthetic and artistic knowledge, not related to academic aesthetics, forming their conceptual vision of the development of art and aesthetics relations. The current state of aesthetics was diagnosed with a brief description of the last 15 years, when contacts with foreign aesthetic schools became regular and academic aesthetics began to be in demand in master's educational programs, intellectual venues for festivals, and biennials of contemporary art, and cultural management programs. A large portion of the article is devoted to the analysis of the composition of the participants, their professional interests and competencies, the frequent concepts discussed in the sections, the structure of polemical problems, and crosscutting topics of all congress participants. ; Статья представляет собой обзор крупного научного события — Второго российского эстетического конгресса (Екатеринбург, июль 2021 года). Оценивается состояние эстетики как научной и образовательной дисциплины в контексте ее истории советского и постсоветского периодов. Выделены четыре этапа советской истории эстетики. Первый этап — 1930-е годы — получил, вслед за К. Кларк, номинацию «возвращения эстетики», что было связано с общим консервативным поворотом сталинской культурной политики, созданием соцреалистического канона, программой строительства социализма, отрицанием функционализма предыдущего — авангардного — этапа. «Возвращение эстетики» не только имело политикопрагматическое содержание, но и способствовало насыщению советской культуры фрагментами классического наследия, прежде всего — философского. На втором этапе — позднего сталинизма — произошел откат эстетики в сторону предельной политической инструментализации. На коротком этапе «оттепели» эстетика начала отставать от публичного либерального дискурса, уступая лидерство публицистике и художественной критике. На этапе «длинных семидесятых» эстетика становится влиятельной и востребованной наукой, включенной в программу «технического прогресса» и «воспитания строителя коммунизма», на эстетику возлагаются важные идеолого-эстетические и прикладные задачи, от нее ожидается влияние на все сферы жизни. Эстетика как философия и наука развивается, откликаясь на контакты с семиотикой, психологией, антропологией, историей культуры, социологией. Опираясь на избирательный поток переводов западных философий искусства, советская эстетика начинает резонировать с мировыми трендами, чему способствует негласный консенсус представления об эстетике как о такой части философского и гуманитарного знания, которая обладает своей автономией. Состояние эстетики в 1990-х и начале 2000-х годов квалифицируется как смена научных поколений и возникновение новых групп профессионалов в эстетическом и художественном познании, не связанных с академической эстетикой, формирующих собственное концептуальное видение развития искусства и эстетических отношений. Современное состояние эстетики диагностировано на кратком описании последних 15 лет, когда контакты с зарубежными эстетическими школами стали регулярными, академическая эстетика начинает быть востребованной в магистерских образовательных программах, интеллектуальных площадках фестивалей и биеннале современного искусства, программах управления культурой. Большая часть статьи посвящена анализу состава участников, их профессиональным интересам и компетенциям, частотным концептам, обсуждаемым в секциях, структуре дискуссионных проблем и сквозным темам всех участников конгресса.
Introduction. The socio-philosophical and philosophical-legal analysis of the processes of law components exchange (legal norms, articles, principles, parts of legislation, legal ideology, etc.) between legal systems (legal spheres) of different countries has shown that this exchange takes place both in history and modernity. Its comprehension first of all began in Western law, starting from the Middle Ages. The assimilation of law components by some countries from other countries is called the legal reception. Historically, from the Middle Ages to the present day, the reception of Roman law componets by European states has been the first and most widespread. But in the XX and especially at the beginning of the XXI centuries (in the era of globalization), the reception of the components of law in the system of interactions of simultaneously existing states, as well as the interactions of countries and the international legal environment, developed significantly. In this case, it became necessary to study the legal mechanisms and patterns of legal interchange of the law components on an international interaction scale, in the era of globalization. The purposes of the article are: to consider some patterns of interactions between legal systems of different countries and other legal entities, in the context of globalization (including legal receptions) from the standpoint of social philosophy; to identify the necessary categorical apparatus, to show the significance of introducing the results into professional legal (law) education. Methodology and research methods: dialectical and system-philosophical approaches, methods of legal comparative studies, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, integration of the results. Results. There have been investigated the interstate processes of legal systems components interchange which lead to carrying out the reception of law by some countries and donation of legal components from other countries and legal entities. This type of diverse supranational legal relations is designated and investigated in the article as the dialectic of the processes of legal receptivity and legal donation. Legal entities, participants in these processes, are designated as legal recipients and legal donors. The historically formed stages of legal receptivity are defined: in time parameters from the past to the present; in the time parameters of the present. Different types of classifications of legal receptions have been grouped (ten such types have been identified). The process of legal donation from leading countries and from international law has also been investigated; its main forms are defined as friendly, aggressive-aggressive, manipulative and competitive legal donation. It is shown that countries – non-independent legal recipients – are in the most dependent position. The specifics of legal reception – donation processes in modern Russian constitutionalism and in Russian law as a whole have been identified. Conclusion. The relevance of including the main laws of legal receptivity and legal donation as separate topics in professional legal education in the era of globalization is substantiated. ; Введение. Социально-философский и философско-правовой анализ процессов обмена компонентами права (юридическими нормами, статьями, принципами, частями законодательства, правовой идеологии и пр.) между правовыми системами (правовыми сферами) разных стран показал, что этот обмен имеет место в истории и современности. Его осмысление раньше всего началось в западном праве, начиная со Средневековья. Ассимиляция одними странами компонентов права от других стран получила название правовой рецепции. Исторически первой и наиболее распространенной стала рецепция государствами Европы, начиная со Средневековья и вплоть до настоящего времени, компонентов римского права. Но в ХХ в. и особенно в начале ХXI в. (в эпоху глобализации) значительное развитие получили рецепции компонентов права в системе взаимодействий одновременно существующих государств, а также взаимодействий стран и международно-правовой среды. В этом случае появилась необходимость исследовать правовые механизмы и закономерности правового взаимообмена компонентами права в масштабах международных взаимодействий в эпоху глобализации. Цель статьи: с позиций социальной философии рассмотреть некоторые закономерности взаимодействий правовых систем разных стран и др. правовых субъектов в условиях глобализации (включающие правовые рецепции), выявить необходимый для этого категориальный аппарат, показать значимость внедрения полученных результатов в профессиональное правовое (юридическое) образование. Методология и методы исследования: диалектический и системно-философский подходы, методы правовой компаративистики, индукции и дедукции, анализа и синтеза, интеграции полученных результатов. Результаты. Исследованы межгосударственные процессы взаимообмена компонентами правовых систем, в результате которых осуществляются рецепции права одними странами и донорство правовых компонентов от других стран и правовых субъектов. Этот вид разнообразных надгосударственных правовых отношений обозначен и исследован в статье как диалектика процессов правового рецепторства и правового донорства. Правовые субъекты, участники данных процессов, обозначены как правовые реципиенты и правовые доноры. Определены исторически сложившиеся этапы правового рецепторства: во временных параметрах от прошлого к настоящему; во временных параметрах настоящего времени. Сгруппированы разные виды классификаций правовых рецепций (выявлено десять таких видов). Также исследован процесс правового донорства от лидирующих стран и от международного права; определены его основные формы: содружественное, агрессивно-захватническое, манипулятивное и конкурентное правовое донорство. Показано, что в наиболее зависимом состоянии оказываются страны – несамостоятельные правовые реципиенты. Выявлениа специфика процессов правового рецепторства – донорства в современном российском конституционализме и в целом в российском праве. Заключение. Обоснована актуальность включения основных закономерностей правового рецепторства и правового донорства в эпоху глобализации в качестве отдельных тем в профессиональное юридическое образование.
