Suchergebnisse

Cette note tente de reconstituer, à partir de l'ouvrage de Wolf Lepenies, la trajectoire de l'écrivain et chroniqueur littéraire Sainte-Beuve en prenant en compte un ensemble de transformations pertinentes: la morphologie et la fermeture relative des carrières d'écrivain dans la première moitié du XIXe siècle, le poids du mécénat d'Etat et des institutions académiques, les effets des crises politiques et des changements de régime, l'autonomisation du champ littéraire, et la distribution des groupes affinitaires et de leurs productions au sein de cet espace. Elle se conclut sur une critique de l'analyse biographique qui ratifie souvent une vision solipsiste de la création et une conception herméneutiste de la production littéraire.

Cette note tente de reconstituer, à partir de l'ouvrage de Wolf Lepenies, la trajectoire de l'écrivain et chroniqueur littéraire Sainte-Beuve en prenant en compte un ensemble de transformations pertinentes: la morphologie et la fermeture relative des carrières d'écrivain dans la première moitié du XIXe siècle, le poids du mécénat d'Etat et des institutions académiques, les effets des crises politiques et des changements de régime, l'autonomisation du champ littéraire, et la distribution des groupes affinitaires et de leurs productions au sein de cet espace. Elle se conclut sur une critique de l'analyse biographique qui ratifie souvent une vision solipsiste de la création et une conception herméneutiste de la production littéraire.

Cette note tente de reconstituer, à partir de l'ouvrage de Wolf Lepenies, la trajectoire de l'écrivain et chroniqueur littéraire Sainte-Beuve en prenant en compte un ensemble de transformations pertinentes: la morphologie et la fermeture relative des carrières d'écrivain dans la première moitié du XIXe siècle, le poids du mécénat d'Etat et des institutions académiques, les effets des crises politiques et des changements de régime, l'autonomisation du champ littéraire, et la distribution des groupes affinitaires et de leurs productions au sein de cet espace. Elle se conclut sur une critique de l'analyse biographique qui ratifie souvent une vision solipsiste de la création et une conception herméneutiste de la production littéraire.

Para esclarecer la relación entre violencia y justicia que cristaliza en el sintagma «fuerza de ley», la figura del lobo, el lupus in fabula, ocupa un lugar estratégico en el discurso filosófico-político de occidente. La doble lectura –o escritura– de dicho sintagma en un texto de Solón debida a un lapsus calami –lapsus magistral sin duda, como recuerda Derrida– nos permite ver la doble cara –paradójica– del kratos soberano: la de la fuerza sin ley y fuera de la ley que establece la ley, y la de la fuerza incorporada a la ley para la realización de la justicia. En la figura del lobo se encarna esa paradoja de la soberanía. ; Para esclarecer la relación entre violencia y justicia que cristaliza en el sintagma «fuerza de ley», la figura del lobo, el lupus in fabula, ocupa un lugar estratégico en el discurso filosófico-político de occidente. La doble lectura –o escritura– de dicho sintagma en un texto de Solón debida a un lapsus calami –lapsus magistral sin duda, como recuerda Derrida– nos permite ver la doble cara –paradójica– del kratos soberano: la de la fuerza sin ley y fuera de la ley que establece la ley, y la de la fuerza incorporada a la ley para la realización de la justicia. En la figura del lobo se encarna esa paradoja de la soberanía. ; For elucidating the relation between violence and justice, that gives rise to the phrase «force of law», the figure of wolf, the lupus in fabula, occupies a strategic place in the western philosophical and political discourse. The double reading –or writing– of such a phrase in a text by Solon, because of a lapsus calami – indeed a masterly slip of the pen, as Derrida reminds us– allows us to see the –paradoxical– double face of the sovereign kratos: that of force without law and outside the law that establishes the law, and that of force incorporated into the law to accomplish justice. The figure of the wolf embodies this paradox of sovereignty.

Cette note constitue une extension, au diagramme cumulatif de Wolf, d'une méthode exposée dans un travail antérieur qui permettait de déduire, du diagramme différentiel de Wolf, la distance et le pouvoir absorbant d'une nébuleuse obscure fonctionnant comme un écran, à partir de dénombrements généraux dans la région obscurcie et dans une région normale voisine.
On admet pour la fonction des luminosités les valeurs de Van Rhijn et on suppose que les log N (m) dans la région non obscurcie peuvent être bien représentés par une ligne droite, c'est-à-dire que les densités stellaires dans l'espace suivent assez exactement la loi de Seeliger.
Deux tables facilitent l'emploi de la méthode. On en donne également une application numérique.

My thesis is titled "The Myth of Medea. From Euripide to Pier Paolo Pasolini and Christa Wolf". The work is a comparative analysis with the purpose of establishing links between the writings - better called rewritings - and political as much as cultural events in the countries of the two modern authors. My thesis focuses on the comparison between the movie by Pasolini (1969) and the novel by Christa Wolf (1996): I consider the two texts very meaningful because of their close connection with both biography of the authors and the historical moment in which the works have been developed.In fact, the work in my thesis does not only concern a literary analysis from an aesthetic and stilistic point of view, but I tried, moreover, to deepen those historical and political events that generated the re-elaboration of Euripide's myth of Medea.I wanted to structure my research in two parallel parts, in order to allow a better comparison between the two works. After a section dedicated to the biographies of the authors (Chapter 1), I focused my study on the actual rewriting of the myth. A particular care was given to the socio-political context in Germany and Italy in the times of release of the novel and the movie, and I afterwards payed a particular attention on the analysis of literary sources: above all in the anthropological field as concerning Pasolini, and feminist one for Christa Wolf, to demonstrate the complex stratification which is the foundation of a re-elaboration of myth (Ch. 2). Secondly, a substantial section of my thesis is dedicated to a detailed analysis of the movie by Pasolini and the novel by Christa Wolf, with an attention on the innovative aspects brought by the two authors, as well as to a poetic linked to political and cultural changes (Ch. 3). I dedicated a special part to the reception of the two works, showing how deep social and political troubles of then were a distort point of view on the works (Ch. 4). The last chapter, finally, analyze the works after the releas of Medea, proving how those ...

My thesis is titled "The Myth of Medea. From Euripide to Pier Paolo Pasolini and Christa Wolf". The work is a comparative analysis with the purpose of establishing links between the writings - better called rewritings - and political as much as cultural events in the countries of the two modern authors. My thesis focuses on the comparison between the movie by Pasolini (1969) and the novel by Christa Wolf (1996): I consider the two texts very meaningful because of their close connection with both biography of the authors and the historical moment in which the works have been developed.In fact, the work in my thesis does not only concern a literary analysis from an aesthetic and stilistic point of view, but I tried, moreover, to deepen those historical and political events that generated the re-elaboration of Euripide's myth of Medea.I wanted to structure my research in two parallel parts, in order to allow a better comparison between the two works. After a section dedicated to the biographies of the authors (Chapter 1), I focused my study on the actual rewriting of the myth. A particular care was given to the socio-political context in Germany and Italy in the times of release of the novel and the movie, and I afterwards payed a particular attention on the analysis of literary sources: above all in the anthropological field as concerning Pasolini, and feminist one for Christa Wolf, to demonstrate the complex stratification which is the foundation of a re-elaboration of myth (Ch. 2). Secondly, a substantial section of my thesis is dedicated to a detailed analysis of the movie by Pasolini and the novel by Christa Wolf, with an attention on the innovative aspects brought by the two authors, as well as to a poetic linked to political and cultural changes (Ch. 3). I dedicated a special part to the reception of the two works, showing how deep social and political troubles of then were a distort point of view on the works (Ch. 4). The last chapter, finally, analyze the works after the releas of Medea, proving how those ...

My thesis is titled "The Myth of Medea. From Euripide to Pier Paolo Pasolini and Christa Wolf". The work is a comparative analysis with the purpose of establishing links between the writings - better called rewritings - and political as much as cultural events in the countries of the two modern authors. My thesis focuses on the comparison between the movie by Pasolini (1969) and the novel by Christa Wolf (1996): I consider the two texts very meaningful because of their close connection with both biography of the authors and the historical moment in which the works have been developed.In fact, the work in my thesis does not only concern a literary analysis from an aesthetic and stilistic point of view, but I tried, moreover, to deepen those historical and political events that generated the re-elaboration of Euripide's myth of Medea.I wanted to structure my research in two parallel parts, in order to allow a better comparison between the two works. After a section dedicated to the biographies of the authors (Chapter 1), I focused my study on the actual rewriting of the myth. A particular care was given to the socio-political context in Germany and Italy in the times of release of the novel and the movie, and I afterwards payed a particular attention on the analysis of literary sources: above all in the anthropological field as concerning Pasolini, and feminist one for Christa Wolf, to demonstrate the complex stratification which is the foundation of a re-elaboration of myth (Ch. 2). Secondly, a substantial section of my thesis is dedicated to a detailed analysis of the movie by Pasolini and the novel by Christa Wolf, with an attention on the innovative aspects brought by the two authors, as well as to a poetic linked to political and cultural changes (Ch. 3). I dedicated a special part to the reception of the two works, showing how deep social and political troubles of then were a distort point of view on the works (Ch. 4). The last chapter, finally, analyze the works after the releas of Medea, proving how those ...

My thesis is titled "The Myth of Medea. From Euripide to Pier Paolo Pasolini and Christa Wolf". The work is a comparative analysis with the purpose of establishing links between the writings - better called rewritings - and political as much as cultural events in the countries of the two modern authors. My thesis focuses on the comparison between the movie by Pasolini (1969) and the novel by Christa Wolf (1996): I consider the two texts very meaningful because of their close connection with both biography of the authors and the historical moment in which the works have been developed.In fact, the work in my thesis does not only concern a literary analysis from an aesthetic and stilistic point of view, but I tried, moreover, to deepen those historical and political events that generated the re-elaboration of Euripide's myth of Medea.I wanted to structure my research in two parallel parts, in order to allow a better comparison between the two works. After a section dedicated to the biographies of the authors (Chapter 1), I focused my study on the actual rewriting of the myth. A particular care was given to the socio-political context in Germany and Italy in the times of release of the novel and the movie, and I afterwards payed a particular attention on the analysis of literary sources: above all in the anthropological field as concerning Pasolini, and feminist one for Christa Wolf, to demonstrate the complex stratification which is the foundation of a re-elaboration of myth (Ch. 2). Secondly, a substantial section of my thesis is dedicated to a detailed analysis of the movie by Pasolini and the novel by Christa Wolf, with an attention on the innovative aspects brought by the two authors, as well as to a poetic linked to political and cultural changes (Ch. 3). I dedicated a special part to the reception of the two works, showing how deep social and political troubles of then were a distort point of view on the works (Ch. 4). The last chapter, finally, analyze the works after the releas of Medea, proving how those ...