State Abortion Politics and TRAP Abortion Laws
In: Journal of women, politics & policy, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 239-262
ISSN: 1554-4788
735 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of women, politics & policy, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 239-262
ISSN: 1554-4788
In: Women & politics, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 239-263
In: ASA 2018 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Political studies review, Band 18, Heft 2, S. NP3-NP5
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 53, Heft 4, S. 682-706
ISSN: 1477-7053
While the questions of how parties seek to address (or not) pressing issues are critically important, scholars have generally paid little attention to where issues are addressed within the political system, and the consequences for party competition of that choice. The fact that issues can be addressed within several institutional (i.e. functional) domains and levels – general elections, parliament, referenda, courts, local government, etc. – implies that political parties may address an issue, and thereby interact with one another, in consequentially different ways depending on the institutional arena or level of government wherein they seek resolution. This article describes how Ireland's parties addressed the electorally volatile issue of abortion via referendum campaigns. The article draws upon multiple sources of evidence to support its findings, including original data based on results from the author's two parliamentary surveys following the 2007 and 2011 election campaigns.
Some of the politics surrounding abortion policy -- The strategic foundations for incrementalism in legislatures -- The nature of Congress and incrementalism in abortion politics : views from the inside and views from the outside -- A short legislative history of abortion -- Sponsors of abortion policies -- Playing the field : committee referrals of abortion-related proposals.
Weaving together analyses of archival material, news coverage, and interviews conducted with journalists from mainstream and partisan outlets as well as with activists across the political spectrum, Deana A. Rohlinger re-imagines how activists use a variety of mediums, sometimes simultaneously, to agitate for - and against - legal abortion. Rohlinger's in-depth portraits of four groups - the National Right to Life Committee, Planned Parenthood, the National Organization for Women, and Concerned Women for America - illuminates when groups use media and why they might choose to avoid media attention altogether. Rohlinger expertly reveals why some activist groups are more desperate than others to attract media attention and sheds light on what this means for policy making and legal abortion in the twenty-first century
In: Polity, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 210-243
ISSN: 1744-1684
In: The review of politics, Band 74, Heft 2, S. 349-351
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: Politics & gender: the journal of the Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 447-449
ISSN: 1743-923X
In: Feminist studies: FS, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 474-483
ISSN: 2153-3873
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Band 126, Heft 4, S. 701-704
ISSN: 0032-3195
In: Political studies review, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 136-137
ISSN: 1478-9299