This dataset comprises a selection of democratic innovations from the "LATINNO Dataset on Democratic Innovations in Latin America" which rely on collective intelligence to respond to problems resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic in 18 countries of Latin America. It complements the "Civil Society Responses to COVID-19 in Latin America Dataset" in which it comprises also governmental responses.
This dataset comprises initiatives from civil society organizations to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic in 18 countries in Latin America. This dataset complements the "LATINNO Dataset on Democratic Innovations in Latin America" and the "Collective Intelligence Initiatives against COVID-19 in Latin America Dataset", which only include cases that fulfill three criteria: direct citizen participation, design able to impact on policy cycle, and aim to enhance democracy. Case descriptions are provided only in Spanish and Portuguese.
The LATINNO Dataset comprises data on 3700 democratic innovations evolved in 18 countries in Latin America. The data reflects the context, the institutional design, and the impact of democratic innovations from 1990 to 2020.
The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents. The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time. The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents. The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time. The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents. The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time. The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents. The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time. The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents. The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time. The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents. The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time. The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents. The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time. The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents. The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time. The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
The Manifesto Project Dataset provides the scientific community with parties' policy positions derived from a content analysis of parties' electoral manifestos. It covers over 1.000 parties from 1945 until today in over 50 countries on five continents. The content analysis aims to discover party and presidential stances by quantifying their statements and messages to their electorate. A unified classification scheme with an accompanying set of rules was developed to make such statements comparable. Analysing manifestos allows for measurement of party and presidents' policy positions across countries and elections within a common framework. Manifestos are understood to be parties' only and presidential candidates' main authoritative policy statements and, therefore, as indicators of the parties' policy preferences at a given point in time. The Manifesto Project Data Collection was originally created by the Manifesto Research Group (MRG) in the late 1970s and the 1980s. The work was continued under the name Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center in the 1990s and 2000s. Since 2009 the Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR) project updates and extends the dataset. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and is still located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
Der Zweck dieser Datensammlung besteht darin, Daten über die Körpergröße ausgerissener Lehrlinge und militärischer Deserteure im kolonialen und frühen republikanischen Nordamerika bereitzustellen. Die Daten wurden anhand von Zeitungsanzeigen, in denen die Flüchtigen beschrieben waren, ermittelt.
Themen: Die Variablen beinhalten - das Jahr, das Jahrzehnt und den Bundesstaat, in dem die Anzeige erschien; - das Jahr, Jahrzehnt und den Ort der Geburt der Flüchtigen (Deutschland, Irland oder eine Region der Vereinigten Staaten) sowie den letzten Wohnort; - Zusätzliche Informationen über die Flüchtigen beinhalten Vor- und Nachnamen, Volksgruppenzugehörigkeit, Geschlecht, Alter, Größe und die Angabe, ob der jeweilige Deserteur Mitglied der Army oder der Navy war.
Politische Themen in Deutschland. Internationale Beziehungen. Einstellung zu den USA.
Themen: Wichtigste Probleme in Deutschland; Parteipräferenz (Sonntagsfrage und Rangordnung); Wahlverhalten bei der letzten Bundestagswahl; Sympathie-Skalometer für ausgewählte Parteien; Zufriedenheit mit der derzeitigen Regierung und der Opposition (Skalometer); Politikinteresse; Interesse an Kommunalpolitik, Bundespolitik und internationaler Politik; Interesse an Nachrichten über Außenpolitik in Fernsehen und Zeitung; Häufigkeit von Nachrichtenkonsum in Fernsehen; präferierte Nachrichtensender; Lesehäufigkeit einer Tageszeitung; Lesen der Bild-Zeitung; Lesen einer örtlichen Tageszeitung bzw. einer überregionalen Tageszeitung; wichtigste politische Ereignisse der letzten 12 Monate; Bewertung ausgewählter Länder: USA, Großbritannien, Sowjetunion, Israel, Polen, Frankreich, Italien, Japan, Ungarn, Tschechoslowakei (Skalometer); Bewertung ausgewählter Politiker: Helmut Kohl, George Bush, Michail Gorbatschow, John Major, Francois Mitterand, Boris Jelzin (Skalometer); Einschätzung der führenden Macht in Westeuropa; Bewertung der deutschen Unterstützung des Golfkrieges; Interesse an der Entwicklung in der Sowjetunion und in den USA; Postmaterialismus-Index; Bewertung der derzeitigen und zukünftigen Beziehungen zwischen den USA und Deutschland; Bewertung der Beziehung zwischen den USA und Deutschland unter Berücksichtigung der Veränderungen in Osteuropa; Einstellung zu einem Abzug der amerikanischen Streitkräfte aus Deutschland; Einschätzung der Wiedervereinigung als eine Gefahr für den Frieden in Europa und Gründe für eine eventuelle Zunahme der Gefahr; Selbstbild der Deutschen und Image der Amerikaner; Einschätzung Deutschlands als verlässlichen Partner der NATO; Einschätzung der Dauer zur Umsetzung der Demokratie in der Sowjetunion; Sympathie gegenüber Amerikanern; Besuch oder längerer Aufenthalt in den USA; Freunde oder Verwandte in den USA.
Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Familienstand; Zusammenleben mit einem Partner; Schulabschluss; abgeschlossene Berufsausbildung; angestrebter Schulabschluss; Berufstätigkeit; Einschätzung der eigenen Arbeitsplatzsicherheit; Arbeitslosigkeit und Arbeitsplatzgefährdung Nahestehender; akademischer Abschluss des Befragten; Haushaltsvorstand; Charakteristika des Haushaltsvorstandes; Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft; Konfession; Kirchgangshäufigkeit; Haushaltsgröße; Personen über 18 Jahren im Haushalt; Parteineigung; Parteiidentifikation; Ortsgröße; Bundesland.
Internationale Beziehungen. Einstellung zu den USA.
Themen: Wichtigste politische Ereignisse der letzten 12 Monate; Wahlbeteiligungsabsicht; Parteipräferenz (Sonntagsfrage); Wahlverhalten bei der letzten Bundestagswahl; Politikinteresse; Interesse an Kommunalpolitik, Bundespolitik und internationaler Politik; Interesse an Nachrichten über Außenpolitik im Fernsehen und Tageszeitungen; Häufigkeit von Nachrichtenkonsum im Fernsehen und in der Tageszeitung; präferierte Nachrichtensender; Lesen der BILD-Zeitung, einer örtlichen Tageszeitung und einer überregionalen Tageszeitung; wichtigste Probleme in Deutschland; Beurteilung der eigenen derzeitigen und zukünftigen wirtschaftlichen Lage; Bewertung ausgewählter Länder: USA, Großbritannien, Russland, Israel, Polen, Frankreich, Japan, Ungarn, Tschechische Republik, Österreich und Italien (Skalometer); Bewertung ausgewählter Politiker: Bill Clinton, Helmut Kohl, Michail Gorbatschow, John Major, Francois Mitterand, Boris Jelzin (Skalometer); Einschätzung der führenden Macht in Europa; Einschätzung ausgewählter Länder als Krisenpartner Deutschlands; Interesse an der Entwicklung in der ehemaligen Sowjetunion und in den USA; Postmaterialismus-Index; Bewertung der derzeitigen und zukünftigen Beziehungen zwischen den USA und Deutschland; Einstellung zu einem Abzug der amerikanischen Streitkräfte aus Deutschland; zukünftige Bedeutung der USA für die Deutschen; Einverständnis mit der Übernahme größerer Verantwortung durch das vereinigte Deutschland bei der Konfliktlösung in der Welt; Einschätzung der Wiedervereinigung als eine Gefahr für den Frieden in Europa und Gründe für eine eventuelle Zunahme der Gefahr; Einschätzung der Demokratie-Gefährdung durch Rechts- und Linksextremismus; Gefahr der Wiederkehr des Nationalsozialismus; Selbstbild der Deutschen und Image der Amerikaner; Einschätzung Deutschlands als verlässlichen Partner der NATO; Sympathie gegenüber Amerikanern; Besuch oder längerer Aufenthalt in den USA; Freunde oder Verwandte in den USA; Selbsteinschätzung auf einem Links-Rechts-Kontinuum.
Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Familienstand; Zusammenleben mit einem Partner; Schulabschluss; abgeschlossene Berufsausbildung; Berufstätigkeit des Befragten; Einschätzung der eigenen Arbeitsplatzsicherheit; Berufsgruppenzugehörigkeit; Haushaltsgröße; Anzahl Personen über 18 Jahre im Haushalt; Befragter ist Haushaltsvorstand; Berufstätigkeit des Haushaltsvorstands; Charakteristika des Haushaltsvorstands; Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft; Konfession; Kirchgangshäufigkeit; Parteineigung; Parteiidentifikation; Ortsgröße; Bundesland.