Our poster discusses an overview of antibiotic resistance. It goes into detail about what it is, how it came to be, and what medical professionals can do in their attempt to prevent it, as well as the general public. It also discusses the impact the impact antibiotic resistance has had on pharmacy, as well as the science behind it. A few organizations working towards this problem, and who keep a close eye on this issue are mentioned as well. We also discuss the determinants of health, which is essentially what is being done about it politically, individually, and the health services provided. Our goal is to stress the importance of properly taking antibiotics, and the potential to prevent this problem from happening. We hope you take some insight behind this issue after reading, and sparks an interest in this topic. ; https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/public_health_posters/1020/thumbnail.jpg
Immediately after their introduction in the beginning of the fourties of the previous century, the agents used to combat infectious diseases caused by bacteria were regarded with suspicion, but not long thereafter antibiotics had the status of miracle drugs. For decades mankind has lived under the impression that infectious diseases were no longer a threat to human health. This optimism was so high at a certain moment that antibiotics were also used against viral infections, whereas viruses are not even sensitive to antibiotics. This wrong use, or if one likes, misuse of antibiotics took also place in animal husbandry, where many tons of antibiotics were added to the feed of healthy animals, just because they grew so nicely from these additives. However, also in the use of antibiotics an ancient law in physics, "action equals reaction" turned out to be applicable. Bacteria reacted to the fact that they were attacked by changing their hereditary properties (through mutation) or by taking up parts of the hereditary properties of organisms (bacteria and fungi) able to produce certain antibiotics themselves. As a result of this reaction, already a short while after the introduction of antibiotics, the first bacteria could be isolated that had become insensitive (immune) for particular antibiotics. The bacteria in fact, had even more surprises in store. They turned out to be fanatic collectors of the pieces of hereditary properties that made them immune for antibiotics and like a stamp collector puts his stamps in an album, they also put their collection in an album (an integron). In this way, the best collectors have now become insensitive to more than ten different types of antibiotics. At the moment there are even bacteria that are not sensitive anymore to whatever type of antibiotic and for these bacteria treatment with antimicrobial agents is no longer available. Where, "work together, live together" is the current motto of the Dutch government, "work together to survive together" might be the motto of bacteria. They put this into practice by passing on their album with its integron collection from one bacterial species to the other. In this way a bacterium that used to be sensitive and could very well be treated with antibiotics can in one stroke become resistant to sometimes thirteen different antimicrobial agents, resulting in the fact that an infection with such a bacterium becomes untreatable. In this thesis research with respect to the sensitivity of the bacterium Salmonella, which can cause intestinal infections in human and animals, for antimicrobial agents is described. Since the (wrong) use of antibiotics can influence the development of resistance to antibiotics, in these studies a comparison has been made between Salmonella bacteria isolated from human, pigs, cattle and poultry in Vietnam and The Netherlands. Whereas in The Netherlands antibiotics are only available on prescription by a physician or veterinarian, antibiotics can be purchased over the counter in Vietnam. This leads to a significantly different attitude in both countries with respect to handling antibiotics. Examples are i.e. not taking a course of antibiotics of the correct dose, not taking a course of antibiotics of sufficient duration, not only taking a course of antibiotics in the case of bacterial infections and the continuing use of antibiotics as growth promoters in Vietnam. Resistance to antibiotics in Salmonella bacteria isolated in Vietnam turned out to occur frequently. In the Netherlands where the development of resistance has been monitored and registered for years the problem was hardly less. In Salmonella isolates from some animal species even resistance to antibiotics for which the use of that antibiotic is not allowed in that animal, was observed. In the current studies Salmonella bacteria have been isolated, both in Vietnam and in the Netherlands that have a collection in their integron album which is unique and has not been described before. At the end of the thesis the measures that could be taken to counteract the development of antibiotic resistance are discussed. The necessity of continuously making an inventory of the situation at local, regional, national and global level is accentuated, as is the shared responsibility that the government and civilians have with respect to the improper use of antibiotics.
Hygienemaßnahmen sind wichtig, richtig und unbedingt notwendig. Aber sie sind nur eine Seite der Medaille, um Infektionen zu verhindern. Die andere Seite ist die optimale Therapie von Infektionen. Unter dem Strategiebegriff "Antibiotic Stewardship" (ABS) gibt es inzwischen zahlreiche Leitlinien und Empfehlungen für einen sinnvollen Antibiotikagebrauch. Eine Klinik ist gut beraten, in ABS zu investieren, denn die positiven Effekte auf das klinische und ökonomische Outcome sind nicht von der Hand zu weisen.
Argues that current demand-side policy of the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control is the wrong route to address the issue of antibiotic resistance as it reduces the value to a pharmaceutical company of investing in the creation of new antibiotics. In this light, three externalities associated with antibiotic usage are discussed: public health, antibiotic resistance, and supply-side externalities. A cost-benefit analysis of FDA policies related to increased antibiotic scrutiny ensues, finding that requiring additional testing for antibiotics makes little sense with respect to patient welfare. Two harmful effects on antibiotic resistance of this FDA policy are denying the market use of an additional antibiotic, Ketek, and the loss of pharmaceutical company incentive to develop new antibiotics.
The scarcity of novel antibiotic compounds in a time of increasing resistance rates has begun to ring alarm bells at the highest echelons of government. Large new financial incentives to accelerate antibiotic research and development, such as market entry rewards (MERs), are being considered. However, there is little focus on how to sustain the efficacy of new, promising antibiotics reaching the market. Currently, inappropriate use of antibiotics is commonplace, which has accelerated resistance development. In an attempt to halt this trend, antibiotic stewardship policies are being implemented in many resource-rich settings. Unfortunately, this has not yet had an impact on the amount of antibiotics being prescribed globally. One important hurdle is misalignment of incentives. While governments and health services are incentivized to promote prudent use of this common good, pharmaceutical companies are incentivized to increase volume of sales to maximize profits. This problem must be addressed or else the major efforts going into developing new antibiotics will be in vain. In this paper we outline an approach to realign the incentives of pharmaceutical companies with wider antibiotic conservation efforts by making a staged bonus a component of an MER for antibiotic developers when resistance to their drug remains low over time. This bonus could address the lack of stewardship focus in any innovation-geared incentive.
In: Ecotoxicology and environmental safety: EES ; official journal of the International Society of Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety, Band 262, S. 115124
The scarcity of novel antibiotic compounds in a time of increasing resistance rates has begun to ring alarm bells at the highest echelons of government. Large new financial incentives to accelerate antibiotic research and development, such as market entry rewards (MERs), are being considered. However, there is little focus on how to sustain the efficacy of new, promising antibiotics reaching the market. Currently, inappropriate use of antibiotics is commonplace, which has accelerated resistance development. In an attempt to halt this trend, antibiotic stewardship policies are being implemented in many resource-rich settings. Unfortunately, this has not yet had an impact on the amount of antibiotics being prescribed globally. One important hurdle is misalignment of incentives. While governments and health services are incentivized to promote prudent use of this common good, pharmaceutical companies are incentivized to increase volume of sales to maximize profits. This problem must be addressed or else the major efforts going into developing new antibiotics will be in vain. In this paper we outline an approach to realign the incentives of pharmaceutical companies with wider antibiotic conservation efforts by making a staged bonus a component of an MER for antibiotic developers when resistance to their drug remains low over time. This bonus could address the lack of stewardship focus in any innovation-geared incentive.
The scarcity of novel antibiotic compounds in a time of increasing resistance rates has begun to ring alarm bells at the highest echelons of government. Large new financial incentives to accelerate antibiotic research and development, such as market entry rewards (MERs), are being considered. However, there is little focus on how to sustain the efficacy of new, promising antibiotics reaching the market. Currently, inappropriate use of antibiotics is commonplace, which has accelerated resistance development. In an attempt to halt this trend, antibiotic stewardship policies are being implemented in many resource-rich settings. Unfortunately, this has not yet had an impact on the amount of antibiotics being prescribed globally. One important hurdle is misalignment of incentives. While governments and health services are incentivized to promote prudent use of this common good, pharmaceutical companies are incentivized to increase volume of sales to maximize profits. This problem must be addressed or else the major efforts going into developing new antibiotics will be in vain. In this paper we outline an approach to realign the incentives of pharmaceutical companies with wider antibiotic conservation efforts by making a staged bonus a component of an MER for antibiotic developers when resistance to their drug remains low over time. This bonus could address the lack of stewardship focus in any innovation-geared incentive.
The discovery and subsequent clinical introduction of antibiotics is one of the most important game changers in the history of medicine. Antibiotics are widely used in dental practice both for therapeutic and prophylactic reason. Unfortunately, in recent years the use of antibiotics has been accompanied by the rapid emergence of antimicrobial resistance causing a major threat to healthcare system. Solid guideline or recommendation is often lacking regarding prescription of antibiotic in dentistry.Issuing antibiotic prescribing guidelines, antibiotic stewardship program, addressing over the counter sale of antibiotics,education programmes can be considered useful for curbing antibiotic abuse. To highlight the severity of the issue, several international declarations have been published to call upon the government around the globe to take action on antibiotic resistance.
Background: Antibiotics are commonly administered in hospitals. Infections are a major factor of morbidity and mortality in a big percentage of hospital admissions in children. Aim: To assess the antibiotics administration frequency and side antibiotic effects in medical inpatient Jordanian children patients. Methods :This prospective and double blind investigation included 257 medical children inpatients, of both sexes, aged 4 months-11 years, administered antibiotics and admitted to Prince Hashim military hospital, Zarqa, Jordan, during the period Jan 2016-Apr 2018. Period of hospital admission and antibiotics administered in hospital including dosing, indications and side antibiotic effects were recorded. Participants were followed up until discharge, admission to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit or death. The data were analyzed for numerical parameters, skewed parameters and categorical parameters. Results: The incidence of antibiotic administration was 81.7% (210). Most of the 210 children who were administered antibiotics were males (59.5%) and came from rural and low socioeconomic origin. Mean age was 4 years. Four children died (1.9%), 32 were transferred out (15.2%) and the remaining (174) were discharged (82.9%). Two (38.1%) or one antibiotic (33.3%) was used. Mean number of antibiotics per patient was 2.0 ± 1; most of antibiotics (76.2%) were administered by parenteral route. Prescriptions were commonly ordered in generic name. The mean antibiotic therapy period was 10 days. 75 % of four side antibiotic effects were skin rashes. Conclusions: Antibiotics administered empirically may be satisfactory. Side antibiotic effects are often and commonly mild.
INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic-resistant infections have become increasingly prevalent nowadays. As a result, it is essential to examine the key socioeconomic and political factors which contribute to the rise in the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in developing and developed nations. This study aims to identify the various contributors to the development of antibiotic resistance in each type of nation. METHODS: PUBMED was used to identify primary research, systematic reviews, and narrative reviews published before Jan 2017. Search terms included antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial resistance, superbugs, multidrug-resistant organisms, developing countries, developed countries. Publications from different countries were included to ensure generalizability. Publications were excluded if they didn't mention factors causing resistance, focused on the molecular basis of resistance, or if they were case reports. Publicly available reports from national and international health agencies were used. RESULTS: In developing countries, key contributors identified included: (1) Lack of surveillance of resistance development, (2) poor quality of available antibiotics, (3) clinical misuse, and (4) ease of availability of antibiotics. In developed countries, poor hospital-level regulation and excessive antibiotic use in food-producing animals play a major role in leading to antibiotic resistance. Finally, research on novel antibiotics is slow ing down due to the lack of economic incentives for antibiotic research. CONCLUSION: Overall, multiple factors, which are distinct for developing and developed countries, contribute to the increase in the prevalence of antibiotic resistance globally. The results highlight the need to improve the regulatory framework for antibiotic use and research globally.