Online Political Hate Speech in Europe: The Rise of New Extremisms, by G.Zaccardi (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020, ISBN 9781788113656); v+236pp., £90.00 hb
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 497-498
ISSN: 1468-5965
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 497-498
ISSN: 1468-5965
In: International journal of human rights, Band 24, Heft 5, S. 509-530
ISSN: 1744-053X
In: Politička misao, Band 55, Heft 4, S. 203-229
World Affairs Online
In: Natalie Alkiviadou (2018) Hate speech on social media networks: towards a regulatory framework?, Information & Communications Technology Law, DOI: 10.1080/13600834.2018.1494417
SSRN
In: Online Hate Speech in the European Union. A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Springer briefs in Linguistics (2017)
SSRN
In: 7 JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law 3 (2016)
SSRN
In: Human rights law review, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 1008-1042
ISSN: 1744-1021
Abstract
In Handyside v. The United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) held that the right to freedom of expression, as provided for in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects not only expressions that are favorably received but also those that 'offend, shock or disturb'. 1 Yet, the Court has since developed a substantial body of inconsistent case-law allowing restrictions on 'hate speech' that severely questions the degree to which offensive, shocking and disturbing speech is truly protected by the ECHR. Against a qualitative and quantitative backdrop, the authors argue that the Court and previously the Commission, have adopted an overly restrictive approach to hate speech, which fails to provide adequate protection to political speech on controversial issues, including criticism of public officials and government institutions and has created an inconsistent and even arbitrary body of case law. Instead, jurisdictions that recognize a need to balance the freedom of expression with limits on hate speech have adopted more convincing approaches of hate speech, providing a robust protection of free speech while leaving room for the State to curtail the most extreme forms of non-violent hate speech.
In: International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, Band 21, Heft 4
SSRN
In: Politička misao: croatian political science review = Political thought, Band 55, Heft 4, S. 203-229
ISSN: 1846-8721