Private litigants and the new international courts
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 22-49
ISSN: 0010-4140
118 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 22-49
ISSN: 0010-4140
World Affairs Online
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 117, Heft 1, S. 172-177
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Forthcoming in the American Journal of International Law
SSRN
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, No. 134, 2022
SSRN
Working paper
In: Written for a symposium on Tom Ginsburg's Book Democracies and International Law, Chicago Journal of International Law (2022)
SSRN
In: The review of international organizations, Band 17, Heft 2, S. 375-396
ISSN: 1559-744X
World Affairs Online
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, No. 250
SSRN
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, No. 228
SSRN
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, no. 261
SSRN
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, No. 248 (2021)
SSRN
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 985-987
ISSN: 1468-0491
In: Global constitutionalism: human rights, democracy and the rule of law, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 413-423
ISSN: 2045-3825
AbstractThe After Fragmentation special issue unites political science conversations about regime complexity with legal/normative conversations about global constitutionalism through a focus on the generation and resolution of interface conflicts, defined as moments when overlapping elements or rule incompatibilities generate actual conflicts. Yet scholars choosing among these two perspectives actually have different objectives. After reviewing the two literatures, I argue that this special issue is closer to the global constitutionalism perspective, which generally seeks legitimated order. By contrast, the regime complexity literature asks how does the fact that global governance is spread across multiple institutions in itself shape cooperation politics. Investigating what it means to get 'beyond fragmentation', I suggest that the potential or actuality of rule conflicts is not necessarily a problem because conflicts are a normal and even salutary aspect of politics. If conflict is not the concern, then what should we be worrying about? Both perspectives, I argue, are amoral because they normalise and help justify an international order where responsibility is spread across institutions, promoting order while failing to address fundamental problems affecting people and the world. In this respect, resolving rule conflicts does not get us beyond fragmentation.
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, No. 195
SSRN
Working paper
In: Albertina Albors-Llorens, Catherine Barnard, Brigitte Leucht edsCassis de Dijon at 40 (Hart Publishing), Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, No. 206, 2020
SSRN