Suchergebnisse

What's wrong with work shows that how workers are treated has wide implications beyond the lives of workers themselves. Recognising gender, race, class and global differences, the book considers the ways formal work is often dependent on informal work and concludes by considering what might make work better.

First published in 1989, this Routledge Revival is a major collection of essays on the competing traditions of social and political theory. The contributions, by international scholars, reflect the re-examination of the boundaries between the 'political' and the 'social', the 'public' and 'private', and 'state' and 'society'. The reissue will be of great value to students in both sociology and political science.Bringing new arguments to bear on the debate about the place of political theory in social science, the contributors discuss such issues as the different languages us.

"Originally published in 1981 Practice and Progress is a collection examining the changes that have occurred in the theories, methodologies and practices of sociology, in the institutional and educational setting of the subject, and in British society. The themes pursued include the professionalization of sociology its development and standing in the universities; the impact on it of Marxism and feminism and the major debates over positivism and empiricism, quantitative methods, linguistic analysis; and numerous other crucial methodological and theoretical concerns."--

"Private Risk and Public Dangers is comprised of a collection of chapters which were originally papers presented in the 1991 British Sociological Association Conference on Health and Society, and they address a range of private risks and public dangers. Issues covered vary from the response to HIV and AIDS and 'foetal alcohol syndrome' to the nature of accidents. These seemingly diverse social situations within which emerges is that we need a more sociologically informed understanding of the personal shading the public dangers they are expected to manage."--

"Transforming Cities examines the profound changes that have characterised cities of the advanced capitalist societies in the final decades of the twentieth century. It analyses ways in which relationships of contest, conflict and co-operation are realised in and through the social and spatial forms of contemporary urban life. This book focuses on the impact of economic restructuring and changing forms of urban deprivation and social exclusion. It contends that these processes are creating new patterns of social division and new forms of regulation and control."--Provided by publisher

A multitude of research studies have provided an important shift away from classic perspectives of why women are prone to encounter significant hurdles in the advancement of their scientific or academic careers, and why "leaky pipelines" are of the order in many scientific fields (SSH/STEM). Instead of presuming that professional trajectories are shaped purely by "subjective factors" of women that lead to a kind of auto-elimination, by opting for something else rather than a scientific career (maternity, family life, following their spouses to another country for his job, etc.) (Beaufays and Krais, 2005:52/53; Grant et al., 2000), the attention has been drawn to looking at research institutions as gendered organisations (Acker, 1990), that translate the social division of work between the sexes in distinctive ways in the practice of scientific work. We would like to underpin the approach that examining gender in the making can contribute to researching science in the making and questioning the norms of science and scientific careers (from Beaufays and Krais, 2005). We argue that these norms are shaped by discourses (Fairclough, 2009; Kuhn, 2006), in the sense of référentiels (Muller, 2006), that are both constructing and constructed by actors' (both womens' and mens') hierarchical articulation, in a process of sense making (Weick, 1995) and referencing of an array of discursive ressources (Kuhn, 2006) in their everyday professional and personal/family lives, which constitutes an important form of identity work (Antaki & Widdicombe, 1998; Jenkins, 1996; Kuhn, 2006). This sensemaking (Weick, 1995) process, we argue shapes institutional practices and feeds on, as much as from discourses in the different research locales (Pred, 1990; Keenoy & Oswick, 2003) or local orders (Friedberg, 1997). Amongst others, one fundamental issue to be tackled is that there is still prevalent in today's postindustrial society a "myth of separate worlds" (Kanter, 1977), and an out-dated symbolic and pratical persistance of the "bread-winner" and "carer" models (despite important shifts in the dynamics of family roles and constellations), which is also present in the university environment. In the context of a precarity of jobs, of the high demands for a competitive game and an accent upon hyper-productivity, this does not create identitical spatio-temporal agency for researchers (Fusulier & Rio del Carral, 2012). Moroever, the enrolment in "greedy institutions" (Coser, 1974), such as research/academia but also the family, is on voluntary basis (Hermanowicz, 1998; Grant et al., 2000), and the nature of scientific/academic work has its or should be having its own unique mission and orientations (Stengers, 2011), albeit shaped by today's changing public and political discourses (Musselin, 2005). Our hypotheses regarding these enrolments are that there are important tensions as much between a) different discourses of demands from the postdoctoral phase and demands of entering a permanent (tenured) position at a given European university, and b) different discourses of demands in family/private life and demands of the professional scientific/academic career. In this paper, we propose a conceptual approach and an empirical application in the Belgian french-speaking institutional context, that tests these hypotheses and has four aims; A) examining what kind of discursive ressources researchers, in the early stages of their scientific/academic careers (after obtaining PhDs and before obtaining a tenured position), use to articulate their professional and private lives; B) how these actors (both women and men) hierarchically use, negotiate and prioritize an array of discursive ressources (Kuhn, 2006); C) if there are and if yes, what kind of gendered logics and dynamics exist in this identity work and finally D) how does this articulation contribute in shaping today's practice of scientific/academic work and mission of research institutions. Bibliography Acker, J. (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4:139-58. Beaufaÿs, S. et Krais, B. (2005) « Femmes dans les carrières scientifiques en Allemagne : les mécanismes cachés du pouvoir », Travail, genre et sociétés, 2005/2 No 14, p. 49-68 Coser, L. A. (1974) Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment. New York: Free Press. Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, London: Longman Fusulier, B., Del Rio Carral, M., 2012. Chercheur-e-s sous haute tension !. Presses de l'université de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve. Grant, L., Kennelly, I. And Ward, K.B. (2000) Revisiting the Gender, Marriage, and Parenthood Puzzle in Scientific Careers, Women's Studies Quarterly, 28 (1/2), pp. 62-85 Kanter R.M. (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books, New York. Kuhn, T. (2006). A "demented work ethic" and a "lifestyle firm": Discourse, identity, and workplace time commitments. Organization Studies 27, 1339–1358. Weick, K. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, California