Harmonizing competing rationalities in evaluating governance
In: Knowledge, technology and policy: an international quarterly, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 38-51
ISSN: 1874-6314
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Knowledge, technology and policy: an international quarterly, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 38-51
ISSN: 1874-6314
In: The American review of public administration: ARPA, Band 53, Heft 7-8, S. 263-279
ISSN: 1552-3357
Active citizens who take initiative are generally regarded as desirable. However, the precise reasons why citizens' initiatives are considered valuable and what their value consists of remain unclear, vague, and often unanswered. In this study, we used Q methodology to explore how civil servants, local politicians, and societal actors in a Dutch municipality view the public value of citizens' initiatives. The analysis reveals four distinct views of the value of citizens' initiatives: a view that values intangible results, a view that values a hands-on mentality, a view that values acting out of a sense of purpose, and a view that values citizens organizing and acting out of their own interests. Theoretically, we distinguish between material, immaterial, and process-oriented interpretations of values, and empirically this distinction shows that across the four value views, the process-oriented values are the most disagreed upon. Finally, we find common ground between the value views that we label "selfish collectivism." This is the view that appreciates citizens' initiatives for solving problems for the sake of the community, not for their altruism, but because they are self-serving. The strong differences in value views suggest that there is a risk that subsequent policy language and instruments based on these views could lead to conflict between the actors involved.
In: Local government studies, Band 49, Heft 5, S. 888-907
ISSN: 1743-9388
In: Journal of civil society, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 243-259
ISSN: 1744-8697
In: Acta politica: AP ; international journal of political Science, Band 56, Heft 3, S. 456-476
ISSN: 1741-1416
AbstractThe decentralisation of policy responsibilities from the national to the local level in the domain of social policies is meant to facilitate a better fit to local conditions, and, consequently, inspire local variation in social policy positions. This article examines two questions: (1) to what extent do Dutch local party branches' social policy positions deviate from their national mother party and local peer parties and (2) do local conditions explain this deviation? To answer these questions, we developed a dataset including 168 local party manifestos from 27 strategically selected municipalities and 8 national party manifestos. Our analyses show limited deviation in local parties' positions compared to their national mother party and other local branches of their national mother party. This suggests that the social policies addressed in the party manifestos of local parties seem to reflect a process of institutional isomorphism. Furthermore, the limited deviation that does exist in local parties' social policy positions is not convincingly larger in municipalities (1) that are smaller, (2) that have higher social benefit dependency, or (3) that have high vote shares for local independent challengers. This is contrary to what can be expected based on the contingency theory.