Quantifying Risk Transformation in Bank Lending
In: Charles A. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2023-28
49 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Charles A. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2023-28
SSRN
In: Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 2023-03-017
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Systems research and behavioral science: the official journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, Band 23, Heft 6, S. 845-846
ISSN: 1099-1743
In: Canadian review of studies in nationalism: Revue canadienne des études sur le nationalisme, Band 25, Heft 1-2, S. 174
ISSN: 0317-7904
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 31-53
ISSN: 1744-9324
AbstractRational choice theory has drawn attention to the phenomenon of structure-induced equilibrium in situations of potential cycling. When there is no majority, first preference or Condorcet winner, the outcome is determined by agenda control and institutional rules of decision making. Within that context, the status quo has a special advantage because of the parliamentary amendment procedure, in which the status quo, as the default option to the bill in formal form, is not voted upon until the last stage. The unsuccessful attempts of the Canadian government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney to respond legislatively to the Supreme Court's Morgentaler decision illustrate these general principles of rational choice. The government was unable to get legislation passed because, with cyclical configurations of opinion in both the House of Commons and the Senate, institutional rules, especially the order of voting required by the parliamentary amendment procedure, favoured the status quo.
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 31-54
ISSN: 0008-4239
In: Canadian review of studies in nationalism: Revue canadienne des études sur le nationalisme, Band 23, Heft 1-2, S. 174-175
ISSN: 0317-7904
In: Terrorism and political violence, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 164-175
ISSN: 1556-1836
In: Canadian journal of law and society: Revue canadienne de droit et société, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 185-205
ISSN: 1911-0227
AbstractResearch shows that adhesions to the numbered treaties were of two types: "internal" and "external." In an internal adhesion, a band living within the previously ceded area agreed to the terms of the treaty, and no new transfer of land was involved. In an external adhesion, a band living outside the previously ceded area agreed to the terms of the treaty, thus adding a previously unceded piece of territory to the treaty area.This distinction is essential to understanding the long-running Lubicon Lake dispute. From the federal government's point of view, all of northern Alberta was ceded in Treaty Eight; so the Lubicons, who live within this area, are entitled to make only an internal adhesion. In contrast, the Lubicons claim to live on unceded land and thus demand to make an external adhesion. Their claim to possess unextinguished aboriginal title to a specific tract of land is used to justify demands for compensation that would not be paid in the case of an internal adhesion.
In: Canadian journal of law and society: Revue canadienne de droit et société, Band 6, S. 211-212
ISSN: 1911-0227
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 624-625
ISSN: 1744-9324
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 589-602
ISSN: 1744-9324
AbstractThe European appropriation of Indian land in North America has often been justified through versions of the "agricultural argument" to the effect that the Indians did not need the land and did not really own it because they did not permanently enclose and farm it. Thus the European settlers could resort to original appropriation as described in Locke'sSecond Treatise. This article examines the agricultural argument as exemplified in the writings of John Winthrop, John Locke and Emer de Vattel. Analysis shows that the argument is formally consistent with the premises of natural rights philosophy because it assumes the equal right of both Indians and Europeans to engage in original appropriation. But the historical record shows that the argument actually applied to only a small portion of the land acquired by the Europeans. Sovereignty is the issue that should receive further inquiry.
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 607-607
ISSN: 1744-9324