Introduction
In: The Problems of Communitarian Politics, S. 1-9
83 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Problems of Communitarian Politics, S. 1-9
In: The Problems of Communitarian Politics, S. 86-110
In: The Problems of Communitarian Politics, S. 47-85
In: The Problems of Communitarian Politics, S. 141-172
In: The Problems of Communitarian Politics, S. 111-140
In: The Problems of Communitarian Politics, S. 10-46
In: The Problems of Communitarian Politics, S. 203-245
In: The Problems of Communitarian Politics, S. 173-202
In: Journal of Public Policy, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 101-103
In: Pouvoirs: revue française d'études constitutionnelles et politiques, Heft 82, S. 17-34
ISSN: 0152-0768
In: The journal of political philosophy, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 169-189
ISSN: 1467-9760
In: Rethinking Local Democracy, S. 89-110
In: Politics, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 9-14
ISSN: 1467-9256
It is important that discussions of 'political correctness' within the discipline of political studies should not just replicate the crude conceptions of both 'politics' and 'correctness' that characterise the disputes that are gathered under that name. As a properly political phenomenon, 'political correctness' calls for careful and critical discussion by political scientists In this paper, the conceptualisations of 'politics' and 'correctness' in these disputes are examined In addition, the idea and practice of 'cultural' or 'discursive' politics is discussed, and the connection with disputes about the academic curriculum is examined.
In: Politics, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 9-14
ISSN: 0263-3957
Examines the conceptualizations of politics & correctness in discussions of political correctness. It is argued that these discussions can illuminate the study of political struggle & models of political process. The idea & practice of cultural or discursive politics are discussed, & the connection with disputes about the academic curriculum is considered. 19 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Sociology: the journal of the British Sociological Association, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 343-358
ISSN: 1469-8684
Here I present extracts from discussion about `class' by teenage girls from working class, upper working/lower middle, and upper middle/upper class backgrounds. The data demonstrate the variation in salience of class for girls from these different groups. This finding stands in contrast to the finding from the same research project that for all girls `gender' is highly salient. The material also underpins an argument about research method. There are ambiguities in the girls' talk about class, which raise two issues: first there is the question of how we interpret ambiguous talk; second, there is the issue of our responsibilities to our informants, who are made aware by the research process that they put forward ambiguous or even contradictory views, and are discomfited by this knowledge. [Table: see text]