Reasonable utility functions and playing the cooperative way
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 215-234
ISSN: 1369-8230
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 215-234
ISSN: 1369-8230
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 160-161
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 160
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 5, Heft 1
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: The British journal of politics & international relations, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 5-17
ISSN: 1369-1481
T. H. Green claimed that 'rights are made by recognition. There is no right but thinking makes it so'. This 'rights recognition thesis' is widely rejected. I argue in this article that, so far from being an idiosyncratic doctrine of 19th-century British Idealism, the rights recognition thesis implies a compelling conception of rights, & one that, surprisingly, is more in tune with contemporary meta-ethics than are many contemporary rights theories. Green's moral theory, I argue, is a form of the widely embraced doctrine of 'moral internalism'. Such internalism, conjoined with a generally embraced analysis of rights, leads to some version of the rights recognition thesis. 17 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: The British journal of politics & international relations: BJPIR, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 5-17
ISSN: 1467-856X
T. H. Green claimed that 'rights are made by recognition. There is no right but thinking makes it so'. This 'rights recognition thesis' is widely rejected. I argue in this article that, so far from being an idiosyncratic doctrine of 19th-century British Idealism, the rights recognition thesis implies a compelling conception of rights, and one that, surprisingly, is more in tune with contemporary meta-ethics than are many contemporary rights theories. Green's moral theory, I argue, is a form of the widely embraced doctrine of 'moral internalism'. Such internalism, conjoined with a generally embraced analysis of rights, leads to some version of the rights recognition thesis.
In: The review of politics, Band 67, Heft 4, S. 775-777
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 354-355
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 2, Heft 2
ISSN: 1541-0986
`This volume combines remarkable coverage and distinguished contributors. The inclusion of thematic, conceptual, and historical chapters will make it a valuable resource for scholars as well as students' -. Professor George Klosko, Department of Politics, University of Virginia. This major new Handbook provides a definitive state-of-the-art review to political theory, past and present. It offers a complete guide to all the main areas and fields of political and philosophical inquiry today by the world's leading theorists. The Handbook is divided into five parts which together serve to illustra
T̀his volume combines remarkable coverage and distinguished contributors. The inclusion of thematic, conceptual, and historical chapters will make it a valuable resource for scholars as well as students' -. Professor George Klosko, Department of Politics, University of Virginia. This major new Handbook provides a definitive state-of-the-art review to political theory, past and present. It offers a complete guide to all the main areas and fields of political and philosophical inquiry today by the world's leading theorists. The Handbook is divided into five parts which together serve to illustra.
In: Sage politics texts
In this text, Gerald F. Gaus provides students with a comprehensive overview of the key tenets of liberalism developed through Hobbes, Locke, Kant and Rawls to present day theories and debates.
In: History of political thought, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 343-345
ISSN: 0143-781X
The 20th century did not witness a significant development in liberalism & liberal theory. Instead, liberal theory today is remarkably similar to the liberal theory of 100 years ago. The same conflicting principles that existed at the close of the 19th century -- such as individualism-collectivism, constructivism-anticonstructivism, value rationalism-skepticism -- are still present at the close of the 20th century. While innovative & complex thought has been introduced, the overall understanding of liberalism has remained static. This phenomenon does not necessary connote a weakness in liberal theory. However, both classical & contemporary viewpoints must be considered if liberalism is ever to become the prevailing political ideology. K. Larsen
In: Key texts
In: classic studies in the history of ideas