Ethics and public administration
In: Bureaucracies, public administration, and public policy
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Bureaucracies, public administration, and public policy
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 457
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Spectrum: The Journal of State Government, Band 67, Heft 2, S. 13
In: Administration & society, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 395-417
ISSN: 1552-3039
In American public administration there is neither an extensive literature on the public nor an agreed-on conception of the public. Five conceptions on the public in public administration are offered, including the pluralist, public choice, legislative, client, and citizenship perspectives. Building on these five conceptions of the public, a set of requisites for a general theory of the public in public administration is offered.
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 228
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 50, S. 228-237
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 95
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Administration & society, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 395-417
ISSN: 0095-3997
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 537, S. 163-172
ISSN: 0002-7162
To explain negative perceptions of government ethics, particularly the ethics of public administrators, the paradox of distance & the absence of role differentiation are employed. In the paradox of distance, the public holds negative views of government generally & public administrators in the abstract, but they have favorable to very favorable views of governmental programs with which they interact & favorable views of the bureaucrats whom they encounter. Much of the negative perception of government ethics & the ethics of public officials is based on public observations of the misdeeds of those who are elected or politically appointed. These negative perceptions are well founded. Unfortunately, the public holds similarly negative views of merit civil servants, although these public officials are much less often associated with corruption or unethical behavior. It is suggested that several contemporary governmental reforms will, in the long run, result in more rather than less government corruption. Adapted from the source document.
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 537, Heft 1, S. 163-172
ISSN: 1552-3349
To explain negative perceptions of government ethics, and particularly of the ethics of public administrators, the authors use the paradox of distance and the absence of role differentiation. In the paradox of distance, the public holds negative views of government generally and public administrators in the abstract, but they have favorable to very favorable views of governmental programs with which they interact and favorable views of the bureaucrats whom they encounter. Much of the negative perception of government ethics and the ethics of public officials is based on public observations of the misdeeds of those who are elected or politically appointed. These negative perceptions are well founded. Unfortunately, the public holds similarly negative views of merit civil servants, although these public officials are much less often associated with corruption or unethical behavior. Finally, the authors suggest that several contemporary governmental reforms will, in the long run, result in more rather than less government corruption.
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 49, S. 95-227
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 55, Heft 1, S. 111
ISSN: 1540-6210