Gangs in a global comparative perspective
In: Freedom from Fear: F 3 ; UNICRI - Max Planck Institute Magazine, Band 2016, Heft 10, S. 70-74
ISSN: 2519-0709
20 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Freedom from Fear: F 3 ; UNICRI - Max Planck Institute Magazine, Band 2016, Heft 10, S. 70-74
ISSN: 2519-0709
How easy is it for rebel groups to purchase weapons and ammunition in the middle of a war? How quickly can commodities such as diamonds and cocoa be converted into cash to buy war supplies? And why does answering these questions matter for understanding civil wars? In What Rebels Want, Jennifer M. Hazen challenges the commonly held view that rebel groups can get what they want, when they want it, and when they most need it. Hazen's assessments of resource availability in the wars in Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Côte d'Ivoire lead to a better understanding of rebel group capacity and options for war and war termination. Resources entail more than just cash; they include various other economic, military, and political goods, including natural resources, arms and ammunition, safe haven, and diplomatic support. However, rebel groups rarely enjoy continuous access to resources throughout a conflict. Understanding fluctuations in fortune is central to identifying the options available to rebel groups and the reasons why a rebel group chooses to pursue war or peace. The stronger the group's capacity, the more options it possesses with respect to fighting a war. The chances for successful negotiations and the implementation of a peace agreement increase as the options of the rebel group narrow. Sustainable negotiated solutions are most likely, Hazen finds, when a rebel group views negotiations not as one of the solutions for obtaining what it wants, but as the only solution
In: What Rebels Want, S. 49-72
In: International review of the Red Cross: humanitarian debate, law, policy, action, Band 92, Heft 878, S. 369-386
ISSN: 1607-5889
AbstractGangs have long been considered a source of violence and insecurity, but they are increasingly identified as a cause of instability and a threat to the state. Yet gangs operate mainly in non-conflict settings, raising questions about whether applying a conflict lens to understand gangs is appropriate. Marked differences appear between armed groups and gangs when considering concepts of ungoverned spaces, the state, violence, and sustainability. Few gangs reach the threshold of posing a direct challenge to the state; this makes comparisons with other armed groups difficult and suggests the need for a more specific analytical lens.
In: Contemporary security policy, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 281-300
ISSN: 1743-8764
In: Contemporary security policy, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 281-300
ISSN: 1352-3260, 0144-0381
World Affairs Online
In: International peacekeeping, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 323-338
ISSN: 1743-906X
In: International peacekeeping, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 323-338
ISSN: 1353-3312
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online