Suchergebnisse

This research attempts to seek changing patterns of raw data availability and their correlations with implementations of open mandate policies. With a list of 13,785 journal articles whose authors archived datasets in a popular biomedical data repository after these articles were published in journals, this research uses regression analysis to test the correlations between data contributions and mandate implementations. It finds that both funder-based and publisher-based mandates have a strong impact on scholars' likelihood to contribute to open data repositories. Evidence also suggests that like policies have changed the habit of authors in selecting publishing venues: open access journals have been apparently preferred by those authors whose projects are sponsored by the federal government agencies, and these journals are also highly ranked in the biomedical fields. Various stakeholders, particularly institutional administrators and open access professionals, may find the findings of this research helpful for adjusting data management policies to increase the number of quality free datasets and enhance data usability. The data-sharing example in biomedical studies provides a good case to show the importance of policy-making in the reshaping of scholarly communication.

Front Cover -- Scholarly Communication at the Crossroads in China -- Copyright -- Contents -- Author Biography -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- The Paradox of Scholarly Communication in China -- References -- Chapter 1: Preparations: Who? -- 1.1 Higher Education: A Brief History -- 1.1.1 Ancient China -- 1.1.2 The Premodern Era -- 1.1.3 The Early Stage of Communist Control (Prior to the Late 1970s) -- 1.2 Modern Education Since the Late 1970s -- 1.2.1 Introduction -- 1.2.2 The National College Entrance Examination -- 1.2.2.1 Remarks -- 1.2.3 College Students -- 1.2.3.1 Remarks -- 1.2.4 University Professors -- 1.2.4.1 Remarks -- 1.2.5 Higher Educational Institutions -- 1.2.5.1 Remarks -- 1.3 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 2: Creation and Dissemination: How? -- 2.1 Printing Technology: A Brief History -- 2.1.1 Papermaking -- 2.1.2 Movable-Type Printing -- 2.2 Scholarship Creation in Modern China -- 2.2.1 Scholarly Misconduct -- 2.2.1.1 Remarks -- 2.2.2 Key Achievements -- 2.2.2.1 Remarks -- 2.3 Scholarly Publishing -- 2.3.1 The Publishing Market -- 2.3.1.1 Remarks -- 2.3.2 Scholarly Publishing -- 2.3.2.1 Remarks -- 2.4 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 3: Preservation: Why? -- 3.1 A Historical Review -- 3.2 Present Practice -- 3.2.1 Libraries -- 3.2.1.1 Remarks -- 3.2.2 Librarianship -- 3.2.3 Archives -- 3.3 Digital Preservation -- 3.3.1 A Brief Description -- 3.3.2 Some Unique Practices -- 3.3.3 Major Databases for Scholarly Materials -- 3.4 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 4: Access: Where? -- 4.1 Uneven Access -- 4.1.1 Libraries -- 4.1.2 Archives -- 4.1.3 Digital Divide -- 4.1.4 Remarks -- 4.2 Open Access -- 4.2.1 Open Access Repositories -- 4.2.2 Open-Access Publishing -- 4.2.3 Open Education -- 4.2.4 E-Government -- 4.2.5 Open Data -- 4.3 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 5: International Collaborations: What?.