Suchergebnisse

In this paper social assistance developments are analyzed in a large number of EU member states, including European transition countries and the new democracies of southern Europe. The empirical analysis is based on the unique and recently established SaMip Dataset, which provides social assistance benefit levels for 27 countries from 1990-2005. It is shown that social assistance benefits have had a less favorable development than that of unemployment provision. Hardly any of the investigated countries provide social assistance benefits above the EU near poverty threshold. Social assistance benefit levels have not converged in Europe. Instead, divergence can be observed, which is mainly due to lagging developments in eastern and southern Europe.

Minimum income protection and social assistance is the last-resort safety net of the welfare state, targeted to the most vulnerable groups in society. Poverty alleviation is thus one chief objective of such benefits. Whether this objective is fulfilled is continuously discussed and debated. This paper provide new evidence on this issue and offers an analysis of social assistance benefit levels in 16 industrialized welfare democracies over the period 1990-2000. It is shown that the period 1990-1995 was characterized primarily by stagnated benefit levels, while in the latter half of the 1990s benefits declined. In most countries, social assistance fails to provide income above the poverty threshold, something that makes it difficult to view these benefits as effective redistributive instruments.

In the Western countries poverty has increased along with the resurgence of low-income targeting and the increased conditionality of social assistance. This paper provides new evidence on the relationship between social minimums and income adequacy by examining the extent to which social benefits distribute income at levels necessary to escape poverty. The empirical analyzes combine macro-level institutional data and micro-level income data for 17 industrialized welfare democracies. It is shown that the period 1990-1995 is characterized primarily by stagnation, whereas social assistance adequacy declined in the latter half of the nineties. In most countries, social assistance fails to provide income above the poverty threshold, something that makes it difficult to conceive benefits as just redistributive instruments.

This groundbreaking book brings together perspectives from political philosophy and comparative social policy to discuss generational justice. Contributing new insights about the preconditions for designing sustainable, inclusive policies for all of society, the authors expose the possibilities of supporting egalitarian principles in an aging society through balanced generational welfare contracts.

The Social Policy Indicators (SPIN) database provides the foundations for new comparative and longitudinal research on the causes behind, and the consequences of, welfare states and social citizenship rights. The SPIN database is oriented towards analyses of institutions as manifested in social policy legislation. To date, SPIN covers 40 countries, of which several have data on core social policy programmes from 1930. There are currently six data modules in SPIN, covering different social policy areas. The following research note describes the theoretical and conceptual basis of the SPIN project, as well as the data it contains.

The purpose of this deliverable is to report on the development of a new framework for collecting good quality institutional comparative data on public services, using Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC), and primary and secondary education as pilot areas. Whereas comparative welfare state research has to an important extent focused on the income redistribution function of the welfare state (i.e. taxes and cash benefits), the public services dimension remains under-examined. This is true both in the area of Early Childhood Education and Care, as well as in the area of the affordability of compulsory (primary + secondary) education. As the literature reviews in the respective areas have demonstrated, both areas have been studied extensively, but indicators that are suitable for country-comparative research are available only to a limited extent. For both policy areas, new data were collected through a network of national policy experts. Taking together the policy indicators collected and the evidence reported regarding ECEC and compulsory education, this deliverable demonstrates the importance of a sustainable data infrastructure to collect policy indicators on these policy areas specifically, and public services in general. Institutional indicators that seek to codify the social rights as they are encoded in policies (and legislation) are important to understand the living conditions of Europeans, and complementary to existing data that are often survey-based. Expert networks are an effective method to collect such data.