Suchergebnisse

IntroductionAdolescents and young adults (AYA) are an understudied population in cancer research. The Initiative to Maximize Progress in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Therapy (IMPACT) cohort includes Ontario individuals aged 15-21 years, diagnosed with a malignancy during 1992-2011. This cohort contains a rich source of patient, disease, and treatment data.
Objectives and ApproachThe IMPACT cohort was created using chart review and linkages to population-based health services databases. The cohort is comprised of AYA with a primary diagnosis of acute leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, sarcoma, or testicular cancer. For the current study, we focused on acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients, and examined survival outcomes of those treated at pediatric vs adult centers, with adult vs pediatric protocols. We assessed 5-year event-free survival (first of relapse, progression, secondary malignant neoplasm, or death) and overall survival.
ResultsThe IMPACT cohort contains 2,963 patients, of which 152/271 ALL patients were treated at adult centers. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS ± standard error) among those treated at a pediatric vs. adult center was 72%±4% vs. 56%±4% (p = 0.03), respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 82%±4% vs. 64%±4% (p
Conclusion/ImplicationsALL patients treated with a pediatric protocol at a pediatric center experienced better, crude survival outcomes compared to those at an adult center. The IMPACT cohort offers the opportunity to study a myriad of questions on different cancer groups, with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes among the AYA population.

IntroductionSingle-parent families are becoming increasingly common around the world with a particularly steep rise in households headed by single fathers. Research suggests that single parenthood is associated with adverse outcomes, however, little is known about the health profile or risk of death of single fathers compared to other parents.
Objectives and ApproachWe aimed to examine mortality risk in single fathers compared to single mothers and partnered parents, which is the first head-to-head comparison of single and partnered parent groups. Our population consisted of 871 single fathers, 4590 single mothers, 16,341 partnered fathers and 18,688 partnered mothers. We combined cross-sectional samples derived from the Ontario component of Statistics Canada's Canadian Community Health Survey (2001 to 2012) linked to health administrative databases to identify medical conditions, health service use, all-cause mortality and cause of death. We investigated differences in mortality using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle and clinical factors.
ResultsEach family group was followed up for a median of 11.10 years (IQR 7.36–13.54). Single fathers had a poor risk profile, particularly among lifestyle factors, such as low fruit and vegetable consumption and alcohol consumption. The mortality rate was three-fold higher for single fathers compared to single mothers and partnered fathers (5.81, 1.74 and 1.94, respectively). Even after adjustment, single fathers had a significantly higher risk of death compared to both single mothers (hazard ratio (HR): 2.49 (95% CI: 1.20 – 5.15, p=0.01)) and partnered fathers (HR: 2.06 (95% CI: 1.11 – 3.83, p=0.02). Small sample sizes precluded us from identifying the leading cause of death for single fathers.
Conclusion/ImplicationsWe found that single fathers had the least favorable risk factor profile and greatest risk of mortality, which may be mitigated by physician intervention. Our study highlights that through cross-sectoral data linkages we can further advance our knowledge of social factors and their profound effects on health.

Grounded in the examples of four impoverished, relocated youths (two Sesotho-speaking orphans in South Africa and two Mexican immigrants in Canada), we explore cultural factors as potential roots of resilience. We triangulate rich qualitative findings (visual, dialogical, and observational) to foreground the particular, as well as acknowledge the universal, in explicating resilience in transitional contexts. Resilience-promoting cultural practices rely on adults to function as custodians of protective practices and values and on youth actively to accept their roles as cultural cocustodians. Our findings urge service providers toward forefronting the specific cultural context of young people in their therapeutic interventions and toward purposefully championing resilience-promoting cultural values and practices.

This paper offers socio‐ecological, situated perspectives on adolescent resilience derived from an application of interpretive visual methodologies to deepen understanding of adaptive youth development in diverse majority‐world cultural contexts (SouthAfrica,Thailand,China,Mexican migration toCanada). The research is not "cross‐cultural"; by contrast, it situates youth engagement contextually, using local perspectives, especially perspectives of adolescents themselves, on "growing up well" under adverse circumstances, to interrogate conceptions of resilience in cultural context. Participants are viewed as members of cultural communities: observations with a small number of individuals are not generalized to national groups. Rather, knowledge gained by these methods is employed to enrich knowledge of the processes of majority‐world youth thriving despite such adversities as poverty and social displacement.