Contesting liberal peace: Russia's emerging model of conflict management
In: International affairs, Band 98, Heft 2, S. 653-673
ISSN: 1468-2346
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International affairs, Band 98, Heft 2, S. 653-673
ISSN: 1468-2346
World Affairs Online
In: Conflict, security & development: CSD, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 15-37
ISSN: 1478-1174
In: Europe Asia studies, Band 70, Heft 10, S. 1612-1637
ISSN: 1465-3427
In: Europe Asia studies, Band 70, Heft 10, S. 1612-1637
ISSN: 0966-8136
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of global security studies, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 559-577
ISSN: 2057-3189
Are rising authoritarian powers such as China and Russia converging towards or challenging the normative structures of the liberal international order? This article argues that scholarship on norm contestation provides a fruitful theoretical avenue for addressing this question. It finds, however, that this literature has problematically tended to either overlook or externalize power dynamics from norm contestation. The article therefore proposes and develops a power political approach to norm contestation that, informed by a realpolitik sensibility, more explicitly and consistently makes power central to the analysis. A power political perspective conceptualizes norm contestation as the expression of battles for influence in world politics that take place at the ideational level and through symbolic instruments. It understands these struggles as occurring in the context of an international system profoundly marked by conflicting interests, cultural pluralism, hierarchical structures, and power asymmetries. This power political lens is then used to identify four modes of contestation that Russian and Chinese actors are engaged in: liberal performance, liberal mimicry, civilizational essentialization, and counter-norm entrepreneurship. It empirically explores how these contestatory practices express themselves at different intensity levels—applicatory, meaning, and validity—and display specific power political logics—fragmenting and integrative—with the goal of undermining the ideational hegemony of liberal Western-based actors and structures in world politics, and advancing alternative non-liberal visions of domestic and international order. Along with contributing to the literature on norms, this article also makes a broader intervention in current debates about rising powers and the future of the liberal international order.
World Affairs Online
In: Third world quarterly, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 77-95
ISSN: 1360-2241
In: Security dialogue, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 137-140
ISSN: 1460-3640
In: Security dialogue, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 135
ISSN: 0967-0106
In: International studies review, Band 25, Heft 2
ISSN: 1468-2486
Discourses and practices reproducing a world where a plurality of distinct civilizations clash or dialogue, rise or fall, color multiple facets of global politics today. How should we interpret this unexpected surge in civilizational politics, especially notable in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, China, and Russia? This paper argues that the growing turn to civilizations or, better, civilizationism should be understood as a counter-hegemonic ideological reaction to the globalization of the liberal international order. It theorizes the deepening and widening of the liberal international order in the aftermath of the Cold War as enabled by powerful constitutive ideological forces, which congeal into a distinctively modern, informal, universal standard of civilization. This liberal civilizational standard can be experienced by a particular category of non (fully) liberal actors within and beyond the West as ideologically entrapping them - through processes of socialization or stigmatization - in a state of symbolic disempowerment. The paper shows how civilizationism provides an ideological path for resisting and contesting the liberal standard of civilization by articulating a distinct and valued (essentialized) sense of collective belonging, and an alternative (generally illiberal) normative system and (broadly multipolar) vision of international order. Along with theorizing and exploring in original ways the drivers of civilizational politics in the current historical juncture, the paper makes two further contributions. It highlights and unpacks the key role of ideological dynamics in the making and contestation of international orders in general and the liberal one in particular. It suggests and shows why civilizations are best approached as ideological constructs rather than cultures, identities, or discourses.
World Affairs Online