Domestic Violence Alleged in California Child Maltreatment Reports During the COVID-19 Pandemic
In: Journal of family violence, Band 37, Heft 7, S. 1041-1048
ISSN: 1573-2851
7 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of family violence, Band 37, Heft 7, S. 1041-1048
ISSN: 1573-2851
In: Children and youth services review: an international multidisciplinary review of the welfare of young people, Band 122, S. 105921
ISSN: 0190-7409
In: Violence and Gender, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 72-80
ISSN: 2326-7852
In: Journal of family violence, Band 36, Heft 5, S. 587-596
ISSN: 1573-2851
In: Journal of family violence, Band 38, Heft 5, S. 775-790
ISSN: 1573-2851
In: Child maltreatment: journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 356-362
ISSN: 1552-6119
Corollary victims represent approximately 20% of all intimate partner homicides (IPH), and many are children. We used National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) data (2003–2017) to compare all IPH incidents with a child corollary victim (n = 227) to all IPH incidents where a child was present but not killed (n = 350). We examined risk factors for child fatality during an IPH. For each risk factor, we calculated the odds ratio for child death during the IPH, adjusting for multiple comparisons. Perpetrator history of suicidal behavior, rape of the intimate partner victim, a non-biological child of the perpetrator living in the home, and perpetrator job stressors increased odds while prior separation of the IPV victim from the perpetrator decreased the odds of a child death during an IPH incident. To our knowledge, this is the first case-control study using live-controls within NVDRS and can help direct prevention efforts for child death during IPH.
In: Research on social work practice, Band 30, Heft 6, S. 678-687
ISSN: 1552-7581
Purpose: To support future development and refinement of social work–led intervention programs among patients with firearm injuries and to demonstrate how a fidelity assessment can be used to adjust and refine intervention delivery in an ongoing trial. Method: We conducted a fidelity assessment of a randomized controlled trial of a social work–led intervention among patients with a firearm injury. Results: We found that our study intervention was well implemented, meeting 70% of the fidelity assessment score items, however, noted lower fidelity with client-based items. Discussion: As a result of fidelity assessment findings, we refined intervention delivery to improve implementation fidelity including beginning to review cases of all patients each month rather than focusing on patients in crisis. Our fidelity assessment process and findings offer insight into the challenges of implementing an intervention among patients with firearm injuries and highlight the value of monitoring intervention fidelity during an ongoing trial.