Suchergebnisse

[ES] En el presente artículo se expone una visión personal, adquirida en buena medida desde la responsabilidad de dirigir la DVGW (la asociación alemana de compañías de distribución de agua y gas, que agrupa a varios miles de socios) sobre el futuro de la industria del agua en el mundo en general y en Europa en particular, a la luz de la Directiva Marco del Agua. La idea que preside el artículo es que cada país debe establecer los mecanismos necesarios para, a partir de sus peculiaridades y del conocimiento de la problemática de la industria del agua, garantizar en el tiempo la sostenibilidad de tan trascendental actividad. ; Merkel, W. (2003). El futuro de la industria de agua en el mundo. Ingeniería del agua. 10(3):337-353. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2003.2589 ; OJS ; 337 ; 353 ; 10 ; 3 ; Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23. October 2000 "Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy" (briefly named "Framework Directive"). Official Journal of the European Communities L 327, 22 Dec. 2000, p.1 ; European Commission: Strategic Document "Common Strategy on the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive". Brussels, 2 May 2001 ; European Commission: Communication on Services of General Interest in Europe. O.J. 281, 26. 9. 1996, p.3 ; F. Nunes Correia, R. Andreas Kraemer: EUROWATER, Vol.1: Institutionen der Wasserwirtschaft (Institutions of the Water Sector), Vol. 2: Dimensionen Europäischer. Wasserpolitik (Dimensions of European Water Politics). Springer Berlin-Heidelberg 1997 ; Productivity Commission 2000: Arrangements for Setting Drinking Water Standards, International Benchmarking. AusInfo, Canberra/Australia 2000 ; C. Schneider: Wasser für den Platz an der Sonne. KA-Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser, Abfall 2001 (48), p.455 ; H. Brackemann et al.: Liberalisierung der deutschen Wasserversor ; gung -Auswirkungen auf den Gesundheits- und Umweltschutz.Texte 2/00 des Umweltbundesamtes, Berlin Nov. 2000 and:H. Brackemann: Strukturentwicklung in der ...

This essay relates the normative discussion about social justice in political philosophy to empirical results from social policy analysis, thus linking two lines of discussions that have hitherto run mostly separate. The argument will be developed by answering four questions. The normative question: what regulative ideas of social justice does the debate about justice in political philosophy supply? The action-theoretical question: what criteria for judgment & political preferences can be found for a justice-oriented politics? The empirical question: how can the "three worlds of welfare capitalism" be judged in light of these hierarchically ordered criteria of justice? And finally the institutional question: which logic should underpin a reform of the welfare state, if this reform is to be both socially just & at the same time realistically achievable. Tables, References. Adapted from the source document.