Suchergebnisse
Filter
74 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Neofunctionalism
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Neofunctionalism" published on by Oxford University Press.
Neofunctionalism and EU Internal Security Cooperation
In: Theorizing Internal Security in the European Union, S. 129-152
EU External Trade and the Treaty of Lisbon: A Revised Neofunctionalist Approach
In: Journal of contemporary European research: JCER, Band 9, Heft 4
ISSN: 1815-347X
This article analyses the EU's Common Commercial Policy (CCP) at the level of Treaty revision and particularly focuses on the last Treaty negotiations that led to the Treaty of Lisbon. The analysis is based on a revised neofunctionalist framework that the author developed in previous work. It draws on the following concepts: (i) functional spillover; (ii) cultivated spillover; (iii) social spillover; and (iv) countervailing forces. Insights into the dynamics and countervailing forces driving Treaty revisions considerably deepen our understanding of the Common Commercial Policy, as EU external trade policy-making is substantially affected by the parameters set by the Treaty. The analysis indicates that the revised neofunctionalist framework can broadly account for the changes of the Common Commercial Policy during the last Treaty revision. It is further suggested that integration in the area of trade policy cannot be explained exclusively by rational choice dynamics, such as utility maximizing actors with fixed preferences, but that socialization through deliberation also needs to be taken into account.
The Dynamics of EU Migration Policy: From Maastricht to Lisbon*
In: Constructing a Policy-Making State?, S. 209-232
Conceptualising common commercial policy treaty revision: explaining stagnancy and dynamics from the Amsterdam IGC to the Treaty of Lisbon
In: European integration online papers: EIoP ; an interdisciplinary working papers series, Band 15, S. 52
ISSN: 1027-5193
Conceptualising Common Commercial Policy Treaty revision: Explaining stagnancy and dynamics from the Amsterdam IGC to the Treaty of Lisbon
In: European integration online papers: EIoP ; an interdisciplinary working papers series, Band 15, Heft 4
ISSN: 1027-5193
Normative Power Europe? EU Relations with Moldova
In: European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 14, 2010
SSRN
Democratic Governance and European Integration: Linking Societal and State Processes of Democracy
In: Acta politica: AP ; international journal of political Science, Band 43, Heft 4, S. 498-500
ISSN: 1741-1416
Dynamics and Countervailing Pressures of Visa, Asylum and Immigration Policy Treaty Revision: Explaining Change and Stagnation from the Amsterdam IGC to the IGC of 2003–04*
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 46, Heft 3, S. 559-591
ISSN: 1468-5965
AbstractThe objective of this article is to account for the varying, and sometimes puzzling, outcomes of the past three Treaty revisions of EU/EC visa, asylum and immigration policy. The article focuses on decision rules and the institutional set‐up of these policies, subjecting the results of the Intergovernmental Conference negotiations leading to the Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice and the Constitutional Treaty to causal analysis. The article maintains that four factors can explain the various Treaty outcomes: (i) functional pressures; (ii) the role of supranational institutions; (iii) socialization, deliberation and learning processes; and (iv) countervailing forces.
Beyond Problem-Solving and Bargaining: Genuine Debate in EU External Trade Negotiations
In: International negotiation: a journal of theory and practice, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 467-497
ISSN: 1571-8069
AbstractThis article suggests that existing negotiation theory, which is dominated by the two paradigms of 'bargaining' and 'problem-solving', does not capture some important characteristics of international negotiations. It is argued that 'genuine debate' encapsulated by Habermas's concept of 'communicative action', which has largely been ignored in the negotiation literature, furthers and complements our understanding regarding negotiators' rationale for action and the dynamics of international negotiations. The paper specifies five conditions conducive to genuine debate: (1) a strongly shared lifeworld among negotiators; (2) uncertainty and lack of knowledge; (3) technical or cognitively complex issues; (4) the presence of persuasive individuals; and (5) low levels of politicization. My hypotheses are probed through a case study of EU negotiations concerning the WTO basic telecommunications agreement. My findings imply that genuine debate may occur most likely in pre-negotiations and at the diplomatic level of negotiations. I also conclude that agreements arrived at through genuine debate tend to be more enduring than those reached by bargaining and problem-solving, and that communicative negotiators are vulnerable to those merely pretending to participate in genuine debate. My analysis also tentatively indicates what kind of arguments may be persuasive in genuine debate.
Between communicative action and strategic action: the Article 113 Committee1and the negotiations on the WTO Basic Telecommunications Services Agreement
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 379-407
ISSN: 1466-4429
The PHARE programme and the concept of spillover: neofunctionalism in the making
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 428-446
ISSN: 1466-4429
'Euprhoria', friendship and wine: The stuff that built another Europe
In: Cambridge review of international affairs, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 277-292
ISSN: 1474-449X
Negotiations on the Reform of the Common Commercial Policy
In: Explaining Decisions in the European Union, S. 114-186