The Politics of Regulatory Reform
In: The Western political quarterly, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 149-167
ISSN: 1938-274X
50 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Western political quarterly, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 149-167
ISSN: 1938-274X
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 1133-1135
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: American political science review, Band 75, Heft 4, S. 1042-1043
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 73, Heft 2, S. 580-581
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 72, Heft 3, S. 1059-1059
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 827-828
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: American political science review, Band 71, Heft 2, S. 693-694
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 419, Heft 1, S. 23-35
ISSN: 1552-3349
After a brief review of the forces which shaped the general revenue sharing legislation, this article investigates thoroughly various pro and con arguments about the program. While there may be a variety of theoretical "pro" arguments, the primary argument in favor of general revenue sharing is that is is politically popular with the public officials who are recipients of the funds. This article also explores the arguments that general rev enue sharing leads to increased citizen participation and fewer administrative requirements for recipient units, and that it increases the strength of the central administration. It urges caution in interpreting the preliminary research results which are available. On the "con" side, it considers a variety of theoretical arguments, but the main emphasis must be on the inequities in the existing legislation. These include the reduction in categorical aid programs, the failure to provide adequately for the largest cities, the inapplicability of fiscal crisis arguments, and the absence of important "side benefits"—institution building, for example—from general revenue sharing legislation. Finally, there is a discussion of the discriminatory provisions and enforcement procedures of the legislation. The dilemma which revenue sharing and the former categorical grant programs were designed to meet is best resolved by strengthening and expanding the block grant approach to federal aid.
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 405, Heft 1, S. 234-235
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 32, S. 283-310
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 193-194
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: American political science review, Band 63, Heft 2, S. 579-580
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Polity, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 35-51
ISSN: 1744-1684
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 33-36
ISSN: 1938-3282
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 104
ISSN: 1540-6210