Suchergebnisse
Filter
Energy Policy in Perspective: Today's Problems, Yesterday's Solutions. Edited by Craufurd D. Goodwin. (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1981. Pp. xx + 728. $29.95, cloth; $14.95, paper.)
In: American political science review, Band 75, Heft 4, S. 1042-1043
ISSN: 1537-5943
Intergovernmental Relations: The Future Is Now
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 41, Heft 6, S. 693
ISSN: 1540-6210
The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. By Alfred D. ChandlerJr., (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977. Pp. xvi + 608. $18.50.)
In: American political science review, Band 73, Heft 2, S. 580-581
ISSN: 1537-5943
Toward a Planned Society: From Roosevelt to Nixon. By Otis L. GrahamJr. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976. Pp. xvi + 357. $11.95, cloth; $3.95, paper.)
In: American political science review, Band 72, Heft 3, S. 1059-1059
ISSN: 1537-5943
Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy.Randall B. Ripley , Grace A. Franklin
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 827-828
ISSN: 1468-2508
Urban Politics and Decentralization: The Case of General Revenue Sharing. By David A. Caputo and Richard L. Cole. (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, D. C. Heath and Co., 1974. Pp. xix, 180. $15.00.)
In: American political science review, Band 71, Heft 2, S. 693-694
ISSN: 1537-5943
THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS DIMENSION
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 50-56
ISSN: 1541-0072
The Pro and Con Arguments
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 419, Heft 1, S. 23-35
ISSN: 1552-3349
After a brief review of the forces which shaped the general revenue sharing legislation, this article investigates thoroughly various pro and con arguments about the program. While there may be a variety of theoretical "pro" arguments, the primary argument in favor of general revenue sharing is that is is politically popular with the public officials who are recipients of the funds. This article also explores the arguments that general rev enue sharing leads to increased citizen participation and fewer administrative requirements for recipient units, and that it increases the strength of the central administration. It urges caution in interpreting the preliminary research results which are available. On the "con" side, it considers a variety of theoretical arguments, but the main emphasis must be on the inequities in the existing legislation. These include the reduction in categorical aid programs, the failure to provide adequately for the largest cities, the inapplicability of fiscal crisis arguments, and the absence of important "side benefits"—institution building, for example—from general revenue sharing legislation. Finally, there is a discussion of the discriminatory provisions and enforcement procedures of the legislation. The dilemma which revenue sharing and the former categorical grant programs were designed to meet is best resolved by strengthening and expanding the block grant approach to federal aid.
ANDREAS G. PAPANDREOU. Paternalistic Capitalism. Pp. 190. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1972. $7.50
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 405, Heft 1, S. 234-235
ISSN: 1552-3349
Regulatory administration: are we getting anywhere? a symposium
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 32, S. 283-310
ISSN: 0033-3352
ADMINISTERING PUBLIC POLICY
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 72-76
ISSN: 1541-0072
Science Policy and the University.Harold Orlans
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 193-194
ISSN: 1468-2508
Science and the Federal Patron
In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 392
Science and the Federal Patron
In: Midwest journal of political science: publication of the Midwest Political Science Association, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 341