Nationalism and Military Effectiveness: Post-Meiji Japan
In: Creating Military Power, S. 27-54
12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Creating Military Power, S. 27-54
In: The nonproliferation review: program for nonproliferation studies, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 355-371
ISSN: 1746-1766
The 2002 National Security Strategy suggested preventive attacks, diplomacy, deterrence, and other policies as means of curtailing threats presented by the spread of nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) weapons to terrorists and rogue states. The author analyzes which mix of these policies might best and most cost effectively address the NBC threat, with special focus on preventive attacks. The past performances of preventive attacks, diplomacy, deterrence, and other policies as means of curtailing the NBC threat are analyzed. The central findings are that preventive attacks are generally unsuccessful at delaying the spread of NBC weapons; that deterrence, especially nuclear deterrence, is highly successful at preventing the use of NBC weapons by states; and that diplomacy has had moderate and perhaps unappreciated success at curtailing the spread of NBC weapons. The author also discusses how funds spent on preventive wars, which are much more expensive than diplomacy or deterrence, might be better spent to combat threats from terrorism and proliferation, on initiatives such as fissile material recovery, ballistic missile defense, and port security. ; https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/1713/thumbnail.jpg
BASE
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 255-272
ISSN: 1468-2478
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 255-272
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
World Affairs Online
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 51, Heft 2, S. 329-348
ISSN: 1552-8766
This article conducts quantitative tests on the relationship between regime type and suicide terrorism for 1980 to 2003. We present the recently popularized argument that democracies are more likely to experience suicide terrorism and a new hypothesis that mixed regimes are especially likely to experience suicide terrorism. We offer several improvements in research design, including using more controls, the nation-year as the unit of analysis, and more appropriate statistical techniques. Using both Freedom House and Polity data, we find that in general, regime type is uncorrelated with suicide terrorism. We do find that there is a statistically significant interaction between regime type and the number of religiously distinct minorities at risk (MARs) with suicide terrorism, but the statistical significance of this finding is limited, and its substantive impact is marginal. We also find that national size, Islam, national experience with suicide terrorism, and global experience with suicide terrorism affect the likelihood of suicide terrorism.
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 51, Heft 2, S. 329
ISSN: 0022-0027, 0731-4086
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 51, Heft 2, S. 329-348
ISSN: 0022-0027, 0731-4086
World Affairs Online
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 48, Heft 6, S. 886-909
ISSN: 1552-8766
A principal agent model is used to test the hypothesis that when proposed uses of force attract the support of the United Nations (UN) Security Council, the rally in support of the American president increases significantly. Regression analysis is applied to rallies during all militarized interstate disputes from 1945 to 2001. Results show that UN Security Council support significantly increases the rally behind the president (by as many as 9 points in presidential approval), even after including an array of control variables. This finding is generally robust across most model specifications. This effect is unique among international institutions because other actions by the UN or regional security organizations do not significantly affect rallies. These findings provide new insight into how international institutions can matter and influence the foreign policies of states by affecting public opinion.
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 48, Heft 6, S. 886-909
ISSN: 0022-0027, 0731-4086
World Affairs Online
In: International organization, Band 62, Heft 4, S. 717-736
ISSN: 0020-8183
World Affairs Online
In: International organization, Band 62, Heft 4, S. 717-736
ISSN: 1531-5088
This research note develops a new explanation of postwar peace duration: periods of peace following wars last longer when the war ends in foreign-imposed regime change. This study tests this hypothesis on a new data set (an expansion of Fortna's (2004) data) of all periods of peace following interstate war cease-fires, over the period 1914–2001. It also tests for other possible factors affecting postwar peace duration, including international institutions, the revelation of information during war, third-party intervention during war, postwar changes in the balance of power, regime type, past conflict history, and others. The article finds strong support for the central hypothesis that peace lasts longer following wars that end in foreign-imposed regime change. This pacifying effect diminishes over time when a puppet is imposed, but not when a democracy is imposed. There are other results, including that the strength of a cease-fire agreement has almost no impact on peace duration.