Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
23 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
At first glance, campaign finance reform looks like a good idea. McCain-Feingold, for instance, regulates campaigns by prohibiting national political parties from accepting soft money contributions from corporations, labor unions, and wealthy individuals. But are such measures, or any of the numerous and similarly restrictive proposals that have circulated through Washington in recent years, really good for our democracy? John Samples says no, and here he takes a penetrating look into the premises and consequences of the long crusade against big money in politics. How many Americans, he asks
In: Cato Institute Policy Analysis, No. 865
SSRN
In: Cato Policy Analysis #724
SSRN
In: Cato Institute Policy Analysis, No. 687, October 2011
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: Cato policy report: publ. bimonthly by the Cato Institute, Band 32, Heft 2
ISSN: 0743-605X
SSRN
Working paper
In: United in Diversity?, S. 37-61
In: Asia-Pacific review, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 96-114
ISSN: 1469-2937
In: History of political thought, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 245-262
ISSN: 0143-781X
FERDINAND TOENNIES HAS BEEN REPRESENTED AS THE BETE NOIR OF THE BAD ASPECTS OF CLASSICAL GERMAN SOCIOLOGY. RECENT STUDIES DISPROVE THIS AND SHOW TOENNIES' COMMITMENT TO SCIENCE, RATIONALISM AND SOCIAL REFORM, AND HIS LATER OPPOSITION TO NATIONAL SOCIALISM. THE AUTHOR FEELS THAT NEITHER OF THESE VIEWPOINTS IS THOROUGH IN COVERING TOENNIES' POLITICAL THOUGHT. THE AUTHOR SETS OUT TO PROVE, USING KANT'S WORK AS A BASE, THAT TOENNIES BELIEVED IN FREEDOM AND THE LIBERAL CONCEPT OF COMMUNITY.
In: American political science review, Band 79, Heft 4, S. 1262-1263
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Cato Policy Analysis Series, No. 622, October 13, 2008
SSRN
At first glance, campaign finance reform looks like a good idea. McCain-Feingold, for instance, regulates campaigns by prohibiting national political parties from accepting soft money contributions from corporations, labor unions, and wealthy individuals. But are such measures, or any of the numerous and similarly restrictive proposals that have circulated through Washington in recent years, really good for our democracy?. John Samples says no, and here he takes a penetrating look into the premises and consequences of the long crusade against big money in politics. How many Americans, he asks,