Not a powerful electoral issue yet: on the role of European integration in the 2017 German federal election
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 26, Heft 5, S. 717-733
ISSN: 1466-4429
110 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 26, Heft 5, S. 717-733
ISSN: 1466-4429
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 17, Heft 5, S. 699-701
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Acta politica: AP ; international journal of political Science, Band 46, Heft 3, S. 323-325
ISSN: 1741-1416
In: Electoral Studies, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 358-365
In: Electoral Studies, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 358-365
This paper addresses the role of ticket-splitting in decreasing the accuracy of recalled previous voting. It suggests that ticket-splitting makes recalling vote choice a more difficult task and thus increases recall error. Using data from three German panel surveys conducted from 1998 to 2008, the paper demonstrates that ticket-splitting increases recall error by a considerable margin, even after controlling for behavioral and attitudinal predictors. This finding suggests that recall accuracy is not a stable voter characteristic. It also lends credence to the notion that the increase in ticket-splitting in recent German elections decreased the accuracy of recalled previous voting. Finally, the evidence suggests that electoral systems affect the validity of survey answers concerning previous vote choice. [Copyright Elsevier Ltd.]
In: German politics, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 92-106
ISSN: 1743-8993
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 17, Heft 5, S. 699-701
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Electoral studies: an international journal, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 358-366
ISSN: 0261-3794
In: Issue salience in international politics, S. 23-38
In: Acta politica: AP ; international journal of political science ; official journal of the Dutch Political Science Association (Nederlandse Kring voor Wetenschap der Politiek), Band 46, Heft 3, S. 323-326
ISSN: 0001-6810
In: Electoral studies: an international journal, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 358-365
ISSN: 0261-3794
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 17, Heft 5, S. 699-701
ISSN: 1354-0688
In: Electoral Studies, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 344-355
In: European Union politics: EUP, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 5-29
ISSN: 1741-2757
This paper addresses public opinion on common European policies in foreign affairs and defence. It proposes three models of support for common policies in these fields. Drawing on Eurobarometer data, the analysis shows that instrumental self-interest and territorial identities contribute considerably to explaining support for common foreign affairs and defence policies. Moreover, support for common policies is strongly driven by domain-specific evaluations of the European Union's performance. These findings suggest that popular support for common European policies in foreign affairs and defence has an experiential base. Thus, elites have an incentive to respond to public opinion when making policy decisions, so this analysis supports the liberal view in international relations rather than the realist account.
International audience ; This paper addresses public opinion on common European policies in foreign affairs and defence. It proposes three models of support for common policies in these fields. Drawing on Eurobarometer data, the analysis shows that instrumental self-interest and territorial identities contribute considerably to explaining support for common foreign affairs and defence policies. Moreover, support for common policies is strongly driven by domain-specific evaluations of the European Union's performance. These findings suggest that popular support for common European policies in foreign affairs and defence has an experiential base. Thus, elites have an incentive to respond to public opinion when making policy decisions, so this analysis supports the liberal view in international relations rather than the realist account.
BASE