Die Begnadigung Deutscher Kriegsverbrecher. John J. McCloy und die Haeftlinge von Landsberg
In: Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 375-414
ISSN: 0042-5702
15 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 375-414
ISSN: 0042-5702
In: Public choice, Band 54, Heft 2, S. 101-121
ISSN: 1573-7101
In: Public choice, Band 54, Heft 2, S. 101
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: Central European history, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 369-385
ISSN: 1569-1616
An older colleague recently observed to me that today we stand further removed in time from the end of World War II than Americans at the beginning of that conflict were from the Spanish American War. To those Americans of 1939, he said, the war with Spain seemed almost antediluvian, while to us World War II lives vividly in memory, and its consequences still shape our lives. As a student of modern American foreign policy, I found my colleague's observation particularly appropriate. American and Soviet soldiers still face each other in the middle of Germany, and Europe remains divided along the lines roughly set by the liberating armies. Yet could we now be facing major changes? Will an agreement to eliminate nuclear weapons in Europe, and glasnost in the Soviet Union transform this environment? Will the postwar division of Europe come to an end? What will be the consequences for the United States?
Thomas Alan Schwartz: Die Atlantikbrücke. John McCloy und das Nachkriegs-Deutschland. Ullstein Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin 1992. 560 Seiten, 58,- DM
In: Diplomatic history, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 623-630
ISSN: 1467-7709
In: The Economic Journal, Band 97, Heft 386, S. 517
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 70, Heft 5, S. 195
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 70, Heft 2, S. 183
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: American journal of political science, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 388
ISSN: 1540-5907
In: American journal of political science: AJPS, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 388
ISSN: 0092-5853
In: American political science review, Band 81, Heft 1, S. 179-199
ISSN: 1537-5943
A considerable theoretical literature argues that if everyone votes sincerely, then an agenda setter has near dictatorial influence on final outcomes, whereas if everyone votes strategically, then an agenda setter's power is considerably reduced. This literature assumes that all feasible agendas are of a special type called amendment agendas. But actual legislative and committee agendas—notably those found in Congress—often are not of this type. Once we expand the domain of feasible agendas to include all types allowed by common parliamentary practice, the influence of agendas on legislative outcomes expands, even with strategic voting. Besides showing with counterexamples that previous results do not extend to a more realistic domain of agendas, we prove some theorems that specify the limits (such as they are) of an agenda setter's power.
In: American political science review, Band 81, Heft 1, S. 179
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: Public choice, Band 46, Heft 1, S. 45
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: Public choice, Band 46, Heft 1, S. 45-60
ISSN: 1573-7101