Navalny's Gamesters: Protest, Opposition Innovation, and Authoritarian Stability in Russia
In: Published in Russian Politics 1 (2016) 347-371
77 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Published in Russian Politics 1 (2016) 347-371
SSRN
In: The review of politics, Band 70, Heft 1, S. 113-115
ISSN: 0034-6705
"Despite decades of Putin, it is too simplistic to assert that authoritarianism has eliminated Russian activism, especially in relation to everyday life. Instead, we must build an awareness of diverse efforts to mobilize citizens to better understand how activism is shaped by and, in turn, shapes the regime. Varieties of Russian Activism focuses on a broad range of collective actions, from labor unions to housing renovation, religion, electoral politics, minority language rights, and urban planning. Contributors draw attention to significant forms of grassroots politics that have not received sufficient attention in scholarship, or that deserve fresh examination. The volume shows that Russians find novel ways to redress everyday problems and demand new services. Together, these essays interrogate what kinds of practices can be defined as activism in a fast-changing, politically volatile society. An engaging collection, Varieties of Russian Activism unites leading scholars in the common aim of approaching the embeddedness of civic activism in the conditions of everyday life, connectedness, and rising society-state expectations"--
In: American political science review, S. 1-1
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Problems of post-communism, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 24-39
ISSN: 1557-783X
In: Problems of post-communism, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 24-39
ISSN: 1075-8216
Pro-Putin rallies before the 2012 presidential elections became campaign venues in which the Kremlin used political symbols -- woven into a narrative of nationalism and tradition -- to define and activate core voters across the Russian Federation. Adapted from the source document.
In: Post-soviet affairs, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 118-137
ISSN: 1060-586X
World Affairs Online
In: Post-Soviet affairs, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 118-137
ISSN: 1938-2855
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 81, Heft 3, S. 892-905
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 05/PS/2012
SSRN
Working paper
In: American political science review, Band 104, Heft 2, S. 289-306
ISSN: 0003-0554
World Affairs Online
In: International area studies review: IASR, Band 17, Heft 3, S. 251-261
ISSN: 2049-1123
We argue that the move to free and fair elections is only the first step in a democratic transition. With this change, competition moves into the legislative arena, where interests are defined not in terms of support or opposition to the old regime, but over competing visions of what government should do. Thus, examining legislative behavior and legislative outcomes helps us to understand the long-term political and policy trajectory of democratic transitions. Building on game-theoretic analysis of majority-rule decision-making, our hypothesis is that, after controlling for factors such as seat share, party survival depends on party relevance—the organization's influence over legislative outcomes. Using legislative roll call data from Hungary, Poland, Russia and Ukraine, we show that relevance is a major influence on party survival, even after controlling for seat shares and other factors. The last section of the paper discusses the implications of these results for democracy assistance programs.
In: American political science review, Band 104, Heft 2, S. 289-306
ISSN: 1537-5943
This article promotes a characterization of intraparty politics that explains how rank- and-file party members control the delegation of power to their cabinet ministers and shadow cabinet ministers. Using the uncovered set as a solution concept and a measure of party members' collective preferences, we explore the hypothesis that backbenchers' preferences constrain the ministerial selection process in a manner that mitigates agency problems. Specifically, promotion is distributed preferentially to members whose own policy preferences are proximate to the uncovered set of all party members' preferences. Our analysis of ministerial appointments in the contemporary British Parliament supports this view. For both the Labour and Conservative parties, front bench appointments are more sensitive to the collective preferences of backbenchers in each party as measured by the party uncovered set than to the preferences of the parties' leaders.
In: American political science review, Band 104, Heft 2, S. 289-307
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: Journal of theoretical politics, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 650-672
ISSN: 1460-3667
This paper compares two solution concepts for majority rule decision-making in multi-dimensional settings: the uncovered set and the strong point. Our goal is to determine which of these solution concepts is the appropriate generalization of the median voter theorem to more complex (and more realistic) multi-dimensional majority-rule settings. By making this comparison, we also contribute to the debate about the degree of sophisticated decision-making exhibited by experimental subjects and their real-world counterparts. Using data from eleven previously-published majority rule experiments and analytic techniques drawn from geography, our analysis confirms expectations that the uncovered set provides accurate predictions of majority-rule decision-making; and, moreover, that the strong point provides little added insight, either as a solution concept on its own, or as a predictor of where outcomes lie inside the uncovered set.